Not exact matches
Although many of these drone advocacy
groups differed with the FAA and DOT on the finalized registration
process, Swanson said a number of
groups banned together and
agreed to be on the registration task force to «forestall more serious and tighter regulation from the Hill.»
Walshe also critically flags how — again, at the point of consent — Facebook's review
process deploys examples of the social aspects of its platform (such as how it can use people's information to «suggest
groups or other features or products») as a tactic for manipulating people to
agree to share religious affiliation data, for example.
... It seems clear to me that many of the commenters do not fall into that
group... they have researched and pondered questions larger than the existence three feet in front of their faces, and whether or not I
agree with their conclusions, I respect the
process... it would be fun to sit down with them and debate our beliefs.
A. (After some discussion the
group agreed on the following as the content of the phrase «Holy Spirit»:) Jesus evoked the life - transformative
process in the paralytic.
In addition, Innovative Dining
Group may disclose personally identifiable information about you to other companies or individuals in the following circumstances: - Innovative Dining
Group utilizes third party service providers to provide products, services or functions on IDG's behalf (such as sending emails or
processing credit cards or fulfilling orders placed online) and asks these service providers to
agree to maintain the confidentiality of your personally identifiable information and not to use your personally identifiable information for any reason except to carry out the purpose (s) for which we retained them; - Innovative Dining
Group needs to protect its legal rights (e.g., if Innovative Dining
Group is trying to collect money you owe); - Innovative Dining
Group must comply with applicable laws, regulations or legal or regulatory
processes; - Innovative Dining
Group has reason to believe that someone may be causing injury to someone or interfering with - In connection with a sale, merger, transfer, exchange or other disposition of all or a portion of the business conducted by the web site.
In the longer term, Councillors
agreed that the disabled parking application
process should be updated in consultation with Disability
Groups, to align with the governments new Personal Independence Payment Scheme.
Newspaper editorials from around the state
agree with the environmental
groups that using the clean water funds to help build the bridge is a bad idea, using terms like «pilfering,» calling it a betrayal of Governor Cuomo's pledge to conduct a transparent
process to build the new bridge.
... At the same time, he «stand [s] by» the outside working
group's
process and expertise and
agrees that the center needs «more central authority and accountability.
Golde
agrees and credits her
group with keeping her focused and efficient throughout the grueling
process of completing her dissertation.
We utilized the tools that we had at our disposal (
group roles, mediation
process), but both of us
agreed that we did not do enough explicit teaching and role modeling of what these skills looked like.
I
agree that the main goal of my participation in the
group is to learn the
process by which the discovery of possible solutions to problems that are subjective in nature with no right - wrong answers — only well thought out opinions — takes place.
The New Tech Foundation's Michael McDowell notes that the start of each project — when students form new
groups — is the ideal time for team members to establish
agreed - on
group norms for decision making and communicating with one another, and the consequences of violating those norms, which makes it easier for both the students and teacher to manage the
group process if it veers off track.
After an extensive review
process, longtime Cat's Pajamas client Books International recently
agreed to upgrade their Cat's software to Media Services
Group's Élan Platform.
As Regan et al. [11] explain, the
process is an iterative one in which each participant «has opinions about the expertise and rationality of other members in the
group» and «
agrees to the formal consensus
process... [and] to compromise their views in light of the views of others.»
Contribute to the financial support of homeless, abused or abandoned Scottish Terriers, including medical care, dental care, temperament and health evaluations, grooming, food, and shelter requirements, through a grant
process, on a case by case basis, only to those independent entities referenced in # 2 below or to other individuals or rescue
groups that
agree in writing and execute all required documents pursuant to the STCA requirements, terms and conditions which the independent (local) rescue
groups have executed.
and in the
process box you in to a pre-drawn path; The Walking Dead provides you with a bunch of characters that will meet each other throughout the progression of the storyline and at one point or another; you will ultimately decide their fate as to if they remain alive ahead of another character or if you abandon that character for not
agreeing with their opinions and actions to protect the rest of the
group and it is in that sense that you are effectively taking that freedom of choice and writing the story as you progress through each scenario and episode.
oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to accept something already
agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s
group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive
groups in the last hours and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional question: in an earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions about how to carry forward the
process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up
processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??
During the first Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction held in June 2007, the Working
Group agreed on three priority areas: gathering and sharing good practices in climate risk - reduction; providing policy guidance to UNFCCC
processes on the post-2012 climate change regime; and developing methods for reducing the carbon footprint of disaster risk reduction activities.
The 18 corporate members
agree; the
group was created «to underline the need for urgent action by the global community and to influence the post-Kyoto
process by demanding a global framework supporting a market - based solution to the climate change issue.
Be sure the chosen
group can actually produce documents in the formats
agreed upon during negotiations and that the production
process can be done timely.
Gingras
agreed to collaborate, and top editors in the industry from more than 75 news outlets and institutions joined the effort that followed, contributing to working
groups focused on every element of the
process.
If no traditional decision making
process exists in relation to the native title decision, another
process must be adopted and
agreed to by the
group;
For example, in Queensland, the Ministerial appointment of trustees to hold land on behalf of Aboriginal people, and trustee decisions to grant leases or other interests in land, must as far as possible be made in accordance with Aboriginal tradition or an
agreed decision - making
process.50 In the Northern Territory, a lease can not be granted unless the relevant Land Council is satisfied that the traditional owners understand the nature and purpose of the proposed grant and, as a
group, consent to it.51 This consent must be given in accordance with either an
agreed or a traditional decision - making
process.52
Where there are no applicable traditional forms of decision - making, then a decision - making
process must be
agreed and adopted by the
group.
Other key structures or
processes agreed under the SRA, such as Priority Working
Groups, either never became operational or faltered.
A lease can not be granted unless the relevant Land Council is satisfied that the
group of traditional owners understand the nature and purpose of the proposed grant and, as a
group, consent to it.97 This
group consent need not be unanimous by must be given in accordance with either an
agreed or a traditional decision - making
process.98 This requirement is a fundamental aspect of the whole scheme of the ALRA (NT): decisions can not be made about Aboriginal land unless traditional owners have given their informed consent.
It asks the question «what would a government and a native title claimant
group discuss if the
agreed aim of the native title
process was the realisation of the claimant
group's right to sustainable development?»
Likewise, under the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth) decisions about the land involving non-Aboriginal use are conveyed to third parties by the relevant Land Council following the traditional owner
group making a decision in accordance with either an
agreed or a traditional decision making
process.49 A variety of other Indigenous entities exist under other land rights statutes.
These bodies enable communal decision making to take place according to traditional means or contemporary
agreed processes, and be communicated to outsiders through a conduit, in the same way that the shareholders of corporations can take decisions as a
group at general meetings and convey this through resolutions and company decisions.
The PBC provides a single point of contact for the
group for third parties, and the relevant Regulations48 enable the PBC to make its decisions about the native title rights it manages by traditional law and custom or an otherwise
agreed decision making
process.
Some claim
groups, in considering what their
agreed decision making
process will be, may decide that a minimum number of Claim
Group members must be present at a meeting before the business of a meeting can happen (this number is known as a «quorum»).