Sentences with phrase «group factors scores»

As recommended by Cosco et al. [6], findings like ours should induce caution in the interpretation of group factors scores, posing the clinical usefulness of the two subscales as questionable.

Not exact matches

The group Female: Arts and Cultural Activities was 6 percent below average for religious television viewing but had an average interest factor score for religion of.21.

These results, also presented at the 2015 European Cancer Congress (ECC2015, abstract # 5BA) today, which involve the group of 1,626 patients with a Recurrence Score between 0 and 10, demonstrated that 99.3 percent of node - negative, estrogen receptor (ER)- positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- negative patients who met accepted guidelines for recommending chemotherapy in addition to hormonal therapy, had no distant recurrence at five years after treatment with hormonal therapy alone.

Published in the December issue of Psychological Science, thestudyevaluated two groups of 8th graders on such factors as grades, standardized - test scores, and IQ - test scores.

After calculating individuals» scores on each set of items (or factors), we placed students into groups based on which factor they scored the highest.

We used three levels of the teacher accomplishment rating (most, moderately, and least accomplished) as the independent variable and eight scores from the teacher factor set derived from our empirical data (time spent in small - group instruction, time spent in whole - group instruction, time spent in independent reading, student engagement rating, home communication rating, preferred style of telling, preferred style of recitation, and preferred style of coaching) as the set of dependent measures.

Some education groups had opposed the bill, saying that test scores couldn't account for all factors in a child's life.

Some schools thought of as high or low performers in the past based on test scores could have ratings that show the opposite because of other factors being used in the ratings, including test score growth over time, readiness for graduation and progress on closing achievement gaps between student groups.

At the same time, groups that endorse teacher ratings that factor in student test scores and often clash with the teachers unions also applauded her appointment, with one calling her «an inspired choice.»

Additionally, ESSA requires states to annually test 95 percent of students in reading and math, to use the participation rate to calculate the achievement indicator, and to factor assessment participation into the statewide accountability system another way.21 For example, four states — Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Mexico, and Vermont — plan to lower a school's classification for not meeting this requirement.22 In three states — Illinois, Nevada, and Tennessee — schools that do not have a 95 percent participation rate can not score at the highest level of proficiency; receive zero points for proficiency; or receive an F on the achievement indicator for the given group of students, respectively.23

Some groups, such as VARC, adjust those raw test scores to control for students» outside factors, such as income or race.

Overall, teachers within the ST and SF groupings tended to score higher on all four of the RTC constructs, indicating that they have a higher resistance to change, as measured by these factors.

Our school profiles now include important information in addition to test scores — factors that make a big difference in how children experience school, such as how much a school helps students improve academically, how well a school supports students from different socioeconomic, racial and ethnic groups, and whether or not some groups of students are disproportionately affected by the school's discipline and attendance policies.

The difference in anxiety scores between GDV cases and the controls group is unlikely to be detected clinically because of the simplistic scoring system that we employed in the survey; however, given the large number of dogs included in the survey, this factor was determined to be significant.

Questions are then scored, grouped and averaged to give scores for 14 behavioural factors.

Insurers can not use income, gender, address, U.S. postal ZIP code, ethnic group, religion, marital status or nationality of the consumer as factors when determining a credit - based insurance score.

Four a priori analyses were undertaken comparing outcomes for the hypothesised subgroups using 2 × 2 factorial ANOVA to assess main (intervention vs comparison group) effects and interaction (intervention by subgroup effects for mothers who were Australian - born vs overseas - born, first - time vs multiparous, had one vs multiple risk factors, and scored EDS ≥ 10 (antenatal psychosocial distress) vs EDS < 10), while maintaining the power of the whole sample.

Key demographic factors including single parenthood, ethnic group, occupational status, and child's ECBI score and age were also taken into account in group allocation in order to balance the groups on key confounding variables.

Factor analyses were then carried out for the multiple - item scores and single item scores from the same group of variables (work demands; resources; personality; coping and outcomes).

From the scores of the two factors combined, four groups of respondents (Steger, 2010) are possible.

The primary outcome measure, the change in the parent scores on the ECBI total problem score from pre - to post-intervention will be calculated for each individual and will be compared between randomised groups using ANOVA with randomised group and strata as fixed factors.

The «group» factor was predictive of scores in the psychological and social relationships QoL domains.

To come up with an accurate score, the ranking evaluates local living standards according to 39 factors, grouped in 10 categories: