Sebastian Luning is listed as a «Founding Member» of
group named Climate Exit (Clexit) led by climate change denier Christopher Monckton.
Willie Soon is listed as a «Founding Member» of
group named Climate Exit (Clexit) led by climate change denier Christopher Monckton.
Howard Hayden is listed as a «Founding Member» of
group named Climate Exit (Clexit) led by climate change denier Christopher Monckton.
Not exact matches
Since taking office, the Trump administration has made a series of moves that have alarmed
groups with a stake in open public information: historians, librarians, journalists,
climate scientists, internet activists, to
name a few.
The newly
named President's Ad Hoc
Group on University
Climate and Culture has created work
groups that will do no more than address the obvious symptoms of the sexual malaise, such as alcohol consumption, and rehash tired methods to prevent sexual violence.
Atlantic Bridge was itself a partner of the American Legislative Exchange Council, a US lobbying
group funded by the Charles G Koch Foundation (predominant funders of the US Tea Party), the National Rifle Association and the Tobacco Institute, to
name but a few, and which campaigns against
climate change legislation and regulation of tobacco.
The national environmental
group named Buerkle to its «Flat Earth Five» campaign against five House members who deny the existence of global
climate change, which Buerkle has called a myth.
Washington — A national environmental
group today
named Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle as one of the top two deniers of
climate change in the House of Representatives, and promised to launch an advertising campaign against her re-election.
This collection of essays, which emerged from a 2012 conference of the same
name at University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee's Center for 21st Century Studies, assembles texts by a
group of scholars who expand on numerous challenges involving engagement with the nonhuman, such as
climate change, biotechnology, genocide, terrorism, and war.
One interesting theme batted around by that
group of late concerns the
name of this
climate - altering enterprise.
Perhaps the filmmakers were simply highly - paid double agents for big oil and big coal trying to undercut the global effort of the similarly
named 10-10-10 campaign kicking off on Oct. 10 (the 10:10
group is one of thousands of participants in the international
climate «work party»).
I agree that cultural cognition — the idea that we shape our views so they agree with those in the
groups with which we most closely identify, in the
name of acceptance by our
group and thus of safety — powerfully explains the polarized passions over whether
climate change is «real,» the «debate» that gets most of the attention about public opinion.
I wanted to be in an NWEI Change is Our Choice: Creating
Climate Solutions
group, so I printed ten flyers describing the course with my
name and contact information, and took them to a monthly meeting in late Spring.
Al Gore's Alliance for
Climate Protection spent over $ 300 million to promote «consensus messaging,» which was featured in Gore's 2006 movie Inconvenient Truth (no doubt the organization gave a $ 1 million to an advertising agency, which conducted a focus group to validate its seat - of - the - pants guess that «reframing» the organization's name as «Climate Reality» would convince farmers to «believe in» climate c
Climate Protection spent over $ 300 million to promote «consensus messaging,» which was featured in Gore's 2006 movie Inconvenient Truth (no doubt the organization gave a $ 1 million to an advertising agency, which conducted a focus
group to validate its seat - of - the - pants guess that «reframing» the organization's
name as «
Climate Reality» would convince farmers to «believe in» climate c
Climate Reality» would convince farmers to «believe in»
climate c
climate change).
To write the report, Heartland assembled a
group it calls the Nongovernmental International Panel on
Climate Change (NIPCC), a particularly revealing choice of
name.
The campaign
group 350 takes its
name from the preferred upper limit on CO2 in the atmosphere to reduce the impact of
climate change.
Since taking office, the Trump administration has made a series of moves that have alarmed
groups with a stake in open public information: historians, librarians, journalists,
climate scientists, internet activists, to
name a few.
However, as
Climate Hawks explained in response to a Daily Caller article that made the same claim, «Americans for Prosperity's predecessor Citizens for A Sound Economy got hundreds of thousands from ExxonMobil,» meaning that «the
group in question simply went by another
name when it was funded by ExxonMobil.»
While no
group with the exact
name «Global
Climate Science Data Center» was created, the concept may have spurred the creation of industry - funded
groups whose mission is similar to that outlined in the 1998 API memo, such as the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, itself founded in 1998.
Big Oil and Big Coal funded sympathetic think tanks like the Heritage Foundation and the Competitive Enterprise Institute and also outright front
groups with
names like Friends of Science and the Global
Climate Coalition, all of which came up with an endless stream of arguments for why global warming wasn't happening and even if it was, nothing should be done about it.
The IPA, a leading promoter of
climate science denial in Australia, refuses to
name its funders but is currently in partnership with Rinehart's lobby
group Australians for Northern Development and Economic Vision to push for lower mining taxes and low regulation in the country's north to promote mining projects.
Last month, a
group named the Council on
Climate Leadership, which included former secretaries of state James Baker and George Schultz, called for a gradually increasing carbon tax that would be paid back to the American people in the form of dividend payments.
It's an appropriate
name for a
group that's attempting to slow some of the runaway misinformation about
climate change, by doing what scientists do with their published work: review it.
«Canadian
Climate Denial
Group, Friends of Science,
Named as Creditor in Coal Giant's Bankruptcy Files,» DeSmogBlog, June 20, 2016.
The current concentration is about 394 parts per million (ppm), and McKibben had considered
naming the
group «450,» after a concentration goal some researchers say would help protect the planet from
climate change's most adverse impacts.
Many large foundations associated with corporate fortunes are active in financing
climate denial
groups — Anschutz, Bradley, Coors, DeVos, Dunn, Howard, Pope, Scaife, Searle, and Seid, to
name a few.
A new organization, appropriately
named the Green New Deal
Group, has picked up on this idea and is laying out an ambitious 100 month agenda that it says is necessary to prevent dangerous global warming, reports the BBC.Tackling the triple crisis of energy prices, the credit crunch and climate change Comprising a number of experts from the fields of finance, energy and the environment, this group has issued a list of proposals that it claims will tackle the threats of high oil prices, climate change and the credit cr
Group, has picked up on this idea and is laying out an ambitious 100 month agenda that it says is necessary to prevent dangerous global warming, reports the BBC.Tackling the triple crisis of energy prices, the credit crunch and
climate change Comprising a number of experts from the fields of finance, energy and the environment, this
group has issued a list of proposals that it claims will tackle the threats of high oil prices, climate change and the credit cr
group has issued a list of proposals that it claims will tackle the threats of high oil prices,
climate change and the credit crisis.
But while the pope's effectiveness in prompting congressional action has yet to be seen, Gibson's resolution is the product of a grass - roots coalition of faith and environmental
groups that has been working quietly behind the scenes for two years under the umbrella
name Call to Conscience on
Climate Disruption (CCCD).
According to the Times Online, a classified
group of scientists code -
named «Jason» developed a rudimentary
climate model back in the late 1970s that predicted global heating remarkably similar to what the IPCC is predicting today.