Illustration of rapidly
growing emission gaps that will enforce carbon negative solutions later this century.
Not exact matches
We speculate that this truncation of the outer disk may be the signpost of a developing
gap due to the effects of a
growing protoplanet; the
gap is still presumably evolving because material still resides in it, as indicated by the silicate
emission, the molecular hydrogen
emission, and by the continued accretion onto the central star (albeit at a much lower rate than typical of younger T Tauri stars).
If a policy prescription does not account for the real complexity in the climate system, and real
gaps in knowledge about aspects of global warming that matter most, is it likely that the public and lawmakers will pursue a big transformation of lifestyles and economic norms to curb CO2
emissions in a
growing world still more than 85 percent dependent on burning fossil fuels to drive economies?
Work Towards 25 - 40 %
Emissions Reductions by 2020 On the subject of emission reductions targets — another area where there's a growing gap between what developing nations (and scientists) say is required and what wealthy nations seem politically willing to do — Mr De Boer said that emissions reductions in the range of 25 - 40 % by 2020 are something all nations should be working
Emissions Reductions by 2020 On the subject of
emission reductions targets — another area where there's a
growing gap between what developing nations (and scientists) say is required and what wealthy nations seem politically willing to do — Mr De Boer said that
emissions reductions in the range of 25 - 40 % by 2020 are something all nations should be working
emissions reductions in the range of 25 - 40 % by 2020 are something all nations should be working towards.
To make our cities more healthy, prosperous and sustainable, while reducing carbon
emissions, we must close the
gap between cities»
growing demand for more sustainable urban services and their ability to access innovative solutions and financing options.
This «
emissions gap» between the reductions pledged and those needed to keep the climate under control is
growing larger, based on new data to be released this week by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Hare's group.
The
gap between production and consumption
grew rapidly from 1990 to 2008, and explains the focus on climate policy in papers published around that time, as the growth in the
gap between consumption and production more than offset
emission reductions in Annex B countries.
During this period, there was growth in imported
emissions, and hence the
gap between production and consumption
grew.
Forecast
emissions are 10 % above both budgets, and this policy
gap has
grown.
To be sure, there's still plenty of federally unregulated greenhouse gas pollution within American borders — perhaps most notably,
growing methane
emissions from the shale gas boom — but the rule helps plug a big regulatory
gap.
ACEEE's graphic analysis of this «Carbon
Gap» (see http://www.aceee.org/press/2003/02/bushs-climate-agreements-business-usual-widens-carbon-ga) shows that U.S. carbon
emissions grew about 15 % from 1990 to 2001, while European
emissions declined slightly.