In other words, can we rely on tree - ring
growth as a proxy for temperature?
Not exact matches
Consequently, tree - ring width and tree - ring density, both indicators of tree
growth, serve
as useful
proxies for temperature.
But
for years prior to that, scientists can only infer
temperatures using what's called «
proxies,» such
as ice cores or tree rings, whose annual
growth can be correlated with annual
temperature variations.
Mr McIntyre: Im sorry that this commenter's language was too intemperate... However, the use of tree rings
as a
proxy for temperature, when one can not control
for the myriad of other factors that influence tree
growth, brings into question the entire enterprise, no?
I will clarify — the tree
growth had been a function of
temperature,
as that was the limiting factor,
for the length of the
proxy,
as confirmed by other
proxies from that area such
as boreholes.
Then the assumption of quasi-linearity is not true, and considering the
growth rate
as a
proxy for temperature is not valid, and the
proxy shouldn't be used.