Sentences with phrase «growth in government spending»

Smart growth: Tying growth in government spending to growth in Illinois» economy.

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

However, there is hope that growth accelerated in early 2013 despite higher taxes and cuts in government spending.

«GDP growth is now much more reliant on tourism and the government's infrastructure spending,» he wrote in a Nov. 28 report.

He claimed that the deficit would be tamed mainly by the force of economic growth alone and, «if necessary,» restraint in the growth of government program spending.

The Penn Wharton Budget Model predicts the added debt eventually would reduce economic growth, as money that might have been spent on productive investment instead ends up in the market for government bonds.

This results in slower growth and thus tax receipts, whilst simultaneously increasing government spending through pensions and healthcare.

In addition, government spending on public infrastructure had boosted non-mining business investment and was likely to support economic growth for some time.

«That's why we put forward a budget that speaks to strategic investments in economic growth and job creation, while at the same time transforming government by achieving our savings targets and limiting program spending growth to 1.1 per cent.»

Regarding the US Government and local governments, most entities are in perpetual growth mode with expanding deficit spending, while free enterprise may already be shrinking.

On December 22, 2017, the Ministry of Science and ICT announced «The Plan for Innovation Growth» whereby the government committed to spend 1.56 trillion won (approx. 1.53 billion USD) on AI and related sectors that will prepare Korea for the «fourth industrial revolution» in 2018.

[The above figure] shows the growth in per capita spending by federal, state, and local governments following the troughs of the four recessions.

«Today's budget delivered on the government's election promise to boost spending for social programs and stimulate growth in key sectors of our economy.

They argue that, since 2009, the federal government's plans to balance the budget have been based on «risky projections, optimistic forecasts of revenue growth and unrealistic plans for spending restraint», which have resulted in increases in the projected deficit with each successive budget, and the pushing out of the date that the deficit would be eliminated.

In other words, the deficit is being eliminated: first, by simply assuming a rebound in economic growth by ignoring economic and political uncertainties; and second, by simply assuming that government departments will not meet their approved spending levelIn other words, the deficit is being eliminated: first, by simply assuming a rebound in economic growth by ignoring economic and political uncertainties; and second, by simply assuming that government departments will not meet their approved spending levelin economic growth by ignoring economic and political uncertainties; and second, by simply assuming that government departments will not meet their approved spending levels.

In other words, over the next five years, this government is planning to spend more money on income splitting for a small number of well off families, a promise made during the 2011 election, than on supporting economic growth and job creation through new spending on research and infrastructure and lowering taxes on investment.

Inflation is also likely to be fanned by an anticipated pickup in economic growth, driven by a $ US1.5 trillion tax cut package and increased government spending.

Some economists have raised concerns that recent moves by the Trump administration and Congress to boost economic growth through $ 1.5 trillion in tax cuts and increased government spending could cause the Fed to worry about overheating and inflation.

Basically, Mr. Flaherty is looking for suggestions on how to «strengthen our economy in the face of global economic threats»; with «cost - neutral or low cost measures», focusing on «more efficient and effective spending» that builds on the «government's belief of respecting taxpayers» dollars» and «encourages private sector growth and leadership».

Although China is still set for sub-8 per cent growth in 2012, its weakest in more than a decade, momentum picked up noticeably in the fourth quarter after the government increased its spending on infrastructure.

Together with the stimulative effects of tax cuts and more government spending, the most likely outlook remains a robust one, with growth still reaching 2.8 % for 2018 and 3.0 % in 2019.

$ 30m for a Cyber Security Growth Centre to create business opportunities in cyber security, which the Government spends $ 5b on each year

Higher taxes and (most likely) less government spending will surely take a bite out the economy and hiring this year, but there are still a few reasons to be optimistic that the economy and job growth will be more robust in 2013 than 2012:

This lends support to our forecast that there will be a slowdown in growth in Q2 from slower government spending, delayed household adjustment to higher tax burdens, and a smaller increase in inventories.

Moreover, in Europe, Italy's new Prime Minister, Enrico Letta, has taken a different tack than his French neighbors by acknowledging that sustainable growth does not come from government spending programs but rather from policies such as labor market flexibility, job training and simplification of Italy's archaic civil justice system.

Breaking the GDP report down, we see that in addition to overall modest strength in the economy (growth was still off from the fourth quarter's 2.9 %), the upturn was helped individually by positive contributions from nonresidential fixed investment, exports, private inventory investment, federal government spending, and state and local government spending.

«Government spending on infrastructure and a moderate increase in business investment, which began to recover in 2017, are forecast to support economic growth next year,» RBC noted in its end - of - year forecast.

While Budget 2018 - 19 does forecast a decline in the debt - to - GDP ratio over the next five years, the decline is entirely the result of economic growth, as government debt will continue to grow for the next five years due to deficit spending though at least 2022 - 23.

«One of the reasons why economic growth has been weaker in this expansion than others is a lack of government spending now I think that in the short - term negative in the long run I think a move in resources from the government sector to the private sector is positive but it takes a while for that to manifest itself in stronger overall GDP growth».

Three years later, despite strong economic growth, the government is projecting deficits through 2022 - 23, with no end in sight to the deficit spending.

An acceleration to four rate increases for 2018, from three last year, would possibly reflect faster economic growth spurred by the $ 1.5 trillion tax cut that took effect this year and $ 300 billion in more government spending.

Many predict growth will slow again in the April - June quarter, as the impact of higher Social Security taxes and government spending cuts begin to weigh on the economy.

The talks in Akiu, to be followed by a G7 summit in central Japan's Ise region next week, started out with a brainstorming session on how best to use monetary policy, government spending and longer - term reforms to help support growth.

To the east is Columbus, growing so fast due to the growth of public spending in big state government and THE big university that Marysville is now almost a suburb.

Even if the Government were to implement Labour's growth plan now, given the failure of the last three years it would not avoid the need for cuts in departmental spending in the next Parliament.

He was warned that a tough medium term plan to cut the deficit — tax rises, spending cuts, pay restraint, that every country had to put in place — could only work if the Government first put in place a plan for jobs and growth.

Of course, it is true that population growth of any kind puts pressure on infrastructure, but in reality falling investment in public services represents a political choice by the current Conservative government, which has opted to spend the tax revenues generated by immigrants and refugees on tax cuts for businesses and reducing the deficit rather than expanding healthcare and education provision.

CIA today said that the Government's spending plans for 2015/16 is good in part but called for more support for competitive energy and innovation to bolster growth.

When we look back at the historical data summarised in Figure 1 below, we find the period since the mid-1980s has been one in which successive governments have opted for small, year - to - year reductions in the growth of overall public spending, rather than greater reductions over a shorter period.

With the figures on economic growth and employment on the rise, they will spend the next five weeks hammering out the simplistic but powerful message that the economy is safe in their hands and that a Labour government would bring chaos.

«No wonder our growth figures are in freefall when this government slashes spending while doing nothing to support growth and jobs.»

«After decades of out - of - control spending, we have in the last five years returned fiscal responsibility to Albany by capping government growth at two percent, cutting taxes, and investing in the successful programs that are rejuvenating our upstate economy.

Having chosen investment in innovation as one of the ten pillars of the Industrial Strategy, the Government's hope is that the Fund will raise research and development (R&D) spend, improve productivity and ultimately contribute to its goal of driving «growth across the whole of the UK».

Government unions will likely continue to push to weaken the cap because it's been an effective curb on the growth of government spending, causing some unions to collect less money in dues than they would have Government unions will likely continue to push to weaken the cap because it's been an effective curb on the growth of government spending, causing some unions to collect less money in dues than they would have government spending, causing some unions to collect less money in dues than they would have otherwise.

«Government job losses can largely be confined to rolling back the excessive growth in administration which has accompanied the spending binge of the last decade.»

«I was the chief secretary to the Treasury who did the last spending review of the last Labour government [in 2007] and my instructions from [chancellor] Alistair Darling were to settle government departments at around 1 % -1.5 % — lower than overall growth in the economy,» he says.

Gov. Cuomo went on to explain how the government will spur private sector job growth and limit government spending by creating public / private sector partnerships that leverage state resources and assets to generate billions in economic growth.

To place this growth rate in context, it is half the average 4.0 % growth rate of public spending under Labour's spending reviews to date, and the same as the 2.1 % growth rate of public spending during the first Thatcher Government from 1979 to 1983.

Government borrowing is up, the fiscal targets set by the chancellor only in June are going to be missed, growth is flat lining, unemployment is ballooning and there is a crisis of confidence in business and consumer spending.

«But, as we face huge cuts in spending, private sector jobs growth is neither strong or sustained enough to take on those people who will lose their jobs due to the government's spending cuts,» he warned.