Importantly, teachers overwhelmingly agree that student - learning
growth over the course of an academic year is the most important metric in measuring their performance.
Not exact matches
And at the Key Learning Community, in Indianapolis, all high school seniors must document personal and
academic growth over the
course of four
years with digital portfolios that contain everything from writing samples to service - learning projects.
Acknowledgments Preface T he concept is simple and attractive: Evaluate teachers on the basis
of how much
academic growth their students experience
over the
course of the school
year.
There seems to be some consensus that teacher effectiveness centers on student
growth — the amount
of social, emotional and
academic progress a student makes
over the
course of a
year.
Across that period, charter schools statewide consistently provided greater
academic growth than their district peers: on average, charter students
over the
course of the study saw the equivalent
of 34 additional days in reading and 63 in math each
year.
It looks at the
academic growth of students
over the
course of a
year, whether schools are paying attention to chronically absent students, and, at the high schools, the focus is on graduation rates and access to advanced
courses.
The letter grade is based 80 percent on the school's achievement score (which uses various data including student performance on end -
of - grade and end -
of -
course standardized test scores) and 20 percent on students»
academic growth (a measure
of students» performance in relation to their expected performance based on the prior
year's test results), resulting in a grade
of A, B, C, D, or F. «Low - performing districts» are those with
over 50 percent
of their schools identified as low - performing.