Sentences with phrase «growth over the long run»

Indeed, looking at two nearly - identical tax reform packages, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated in 2011 that one producing $ 600 billion of net revenue would generate about one - third more growth over the long run than a revenue - neutral tax reform with the same structure.

Indeed, looking at two nearly identical tax reform packages, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated in 2011 that one producing $ 600 billion of net revenue would generate about one - third more growth over the long run than a revenue - neutral tax reform with the same structure.

Columbia Real Estate Equity A (MUTF: CREAX) seeks capital growth over the long run.

AMG Managers Real Estate Securities (MRESX - Free Report) seeks capital growth over the long run with high income.

Not exact matches

Over the long run, growth actually correlates negatively with market returns, according to a number of landmark studies.

«Over the long run, we believe that subscription growth on the developed market side through many of their channels of other business lines could actually provide a P / E multiple enhancement in year four and five» of a five - year timeline, Morganlander said.

For entrepreneurs running these overnight sensations, however, it's a tough balance between getting all the benefits of that growth, including brand recognition and getting in with value retailers, while taking steps to make sure it's sustainable over the long run.

World Gold Council's Chief Market Strategist, John Reade, said in his 2018 outlook for gold that, «Over the long run, income growth has been the most important driver of gold demand.

But over the long run, profit growth always leads to capital gains.

Assume, for example, that a disorderly rebalancing occurs because Beijing waits so long to force through the reforms that it runs into debt capacity limits (i.e. the growth in debt can not exceed the growth in the amount of bad debt that must continually be rolled over).

Over the long run, considering the long - term growth of the U.S. economy, it would be wise to expect interest rates to normalize at higher levels than they are now, which benefits B of A.

If I assume a dividend growth rate of 6 percent (about the long - run average *), the current S&P 500 dividend yield of 2.1 percent (from multpl.com), a terminal S&P 500 dividend yield of 4 percent (Hussman says that the dividend yield on stocks has historically averaged about 4 percent), the expected nominal return over ten years is 2.4 percent annually.

They didn't, because the theory of the Republican tax plan is completely different, namely that cutting corporate tax rates will incentivize more business investment in capital goods, thus spurring higher productivity, more economic growth, and higher wages over the long run.

With the risks to the Australian economy from abroad abating further over recent months, and with signs that domestic growth was running faster than expected, the Board's deliberations turned to the question of how much longer such an expansionary stance of policy should be maintained.

But stocks offer the most growth potential over the long run.

Over the long run, you're not going to get all - out job growth unless you see corresponding increases in economic output.

(A metaphysics of process — dealing with growth, development and decay — thus may in the long run prove more useful to the theological enterprise than a metaphysics of being; Whitehead and Bergson over Aquinas and Mascall.)

Jonathan Portes, UK in a Changing Europe senior fellow, said: «It is entirely legitimate for them to argue that over the long run Brexit will reduce UK growth, with damaging consequences for tax and spending.

The speed and magnitude of climate change may mean that increased forest mortality and contractions in forest distributions will outpace any gains in forest growth and productivity over the long run, leading to a net loss of forested area in Montana.

At a news conference last week, he said, «The tax cut should be targeted to the middle class and to education so we raise incomes and growth for America over the long run.»

As a long term investor I ride the roller coaster of ups and downs with the knowledge that over the long run the returns will average out to a solid 7 - 8 % growth.

So, over the long run, a portfolio with a large proportion of value stocks should outperform one with a large proportion of growth stocks.

While we have no idea where oil prices will settle in the short run, it remains our view that oil prices can not stay down at today's depressed prices for too long, largely due to what we believe to be the relatively modest current level of excess capacity, our expectations of continued growth in demand over time, and the high marginal costs for finding and developing new sources of supply.

The dividend was grown by more than nine percent a year over the last five years, but with the earnings growth rate being lower than that the dividend growth rate will decline somewhat in the long run.

There are several reasons to invest in high quality dividend growth stocks for the long - run over ETFs:

Over the long run, I expect the company's earnings growth rate to be at more of a mid-single digit rate, reflecting moderating price increases and continued volume growth in line with broader population growth.

This approach will generally give you the mix of growth and income that you need in order to meet your spending needs and sustain your portfolio over the long run.

However, I am in the camp that all of that investment growth over your career would result in higher total taxable dollars, so the Roth saves you money in the long run.

But over a decade, the top funds are generally those run by conservative managers who focus on long - term growth in the economy.

I suppose the question is either a) Do you have any longer term data (20,30 years +) to support the idea that EM should beat DM over the long run or b) Do you have any data to show what drove the EM returns — is it made up of rapid earnings growth, P / E expansion etc?

If we assume ~ 1 percent GNP growth in Q4 2012 and Q1 2013 (the long - run CAGR is about 1 percent per quarter), and the market has rallied around 10 percent, the ratio now stands at ~ 107 percent, which is around 40 percent over the long - run mean (since 1949).

If I assume a dividend growth rate of 6 percent (about the long - run average *), the current S&P 500 dividend yield of 2.1 percent (from multpl.com), a terminal S&P 500 dividend yield of 4 percent (Hussman says that the dividend yield on stocks has historically averaged about 4 percent), the expected nominal return over ten years is 2.4 percent annually.

While dividends and dividend growth can be financed in many ways over the short run, they are a true litmus of a company's profitability over the long term.

While we expect our clients» portfolio values to trend higher over the long run, focusing on dividend growth provides a more stable estimate of what matters most in retirement: Portfolio Income.

These negative real rates of interest paid by an increasing proportion of the developed world's governments on their debt will not preserve our purchasing power over the long run, let alone generate the growth in real wealth necessary to achieve our investment objectives.

Nobody knows whether value or growth will win over the long run, but they will go back and forth each year and my projection assumes that in the long run they will be identical.

Historically, deviations in growth from long - run averages decay over a period of years.

Since stock market returns have outstripped wage growth by a considerable margin (over the long run), I'm not clear on how commodities could have kept pace with equities.

Some might look a bit pricey, but they all have strong growth prospects over the long run.

Specimens of elkhorn coral living in water with excess carbon dioxide have been studied for fertilization rates, ability of larvae to settle on reef substrate (where they produce new corals), and subsequent growth and survival.3 Three levels of carbon dioxide were tested, corresponding to concentrations today, at mid-century, and at the end of the century on a high - emissions path.3, 5 At the mid-century concentration, the ability of fertilization to occur and for larvae to settle successfully on the reef was significantly reduced: around 52 percent, and the decline intensified to about 73 percent at the late - century concentration.3 The corals» ability to survive over the long run declined as well, by an average of 39 percent and 50 percent respectively.3, 4

A society that depends on inexpensive energy to maintain a high standard of living and constant growth faces a predicament — it can not maintain itself over the long run without high net energy fuels.

They are fed up with a bunch of white environmentalists and oppressed do - gooders running the country into ruin by ignoring the fundamentals of jobs, wage growth, and personal and family security in favor of reduced coal burning, reduced oil drilling, no oil pipelines, no fracking, endangered species over the human kind, and attempts to control the long - term climate at tremendous cost to the citizenry.

Netflix stock is pricey, but over the long run it's provided consistent growth for investors patient enough to let it run its course.

Most important, price appreciation should track closely with income growth, a pace described as sustainable over the long run.