AEOHEG, similarly, denotes a high economic
growth scenario without the CPP.)
Not exact matches
In a
scenario without Nafta, Banorte economists put Mexico's GDP
growth at 1.6 % in 2018.
Obviously this set of
scenarios — in which GDP grows on average at rates between 3 % and 6 % for ten years while credit efficiency is improved so dramatically that in 5 - 6 years China begins to deleverage and by the end of the period these
growth rates can be maintained with no
growth in credit — is theoretically possible, but just as obviously it is highly implausible, and I can not think of any country in history that has achieved such a turnaround in its financial sector
without having first experienced a brutal financial crisis.
If adaptation can be completed within 10 years, economic
growth in the 21st century would be 0.6 % slower if climate changes according to the A2
scenario than in the case
without climate change.
Scenario A was exponential
growth without volcanic eruptions.
Well, according to a new piece at BBC News, the UN is concerned that
without greater efforts to address population
growth a high -
growth scenario may come to pass.