Sentences with phrase «guarantee a return on investment as»

Of course, tax deferral is still available as a contractual structure that can guarantee a return on investment as an income stream for a set contractual period of time.

Not exact matches

Traditional car sharing will only place cars where it can get a return on investment, such as dense urban areas or in university towns where you can guarantee that.

You're doubling down on the risks like that, as currently there are no safe investments that are guaranteed to return more than the mortgage rate for 25 years.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Klein in 2015 still received income from the firm through a return on investment of equity, amounting to $ 5,000 as well as a $ 36,000 guaranteed payment.

This is because the high expense associated with the project could prompt participating governments to demand guaranteed time as a scientific return on investment, thereby restricting access and leaving little time to nonmembers.

And the fund managers may still make overly risky investments that can leave the plan underfunded, although one suspects there will be less temptation to do so if the guaranteed return approximates the rate on risk - free investments, as is typically the case.

Furthermore, the effectiveness, as well as the Return On Investment of the training is not entirely guaranteed: It is sometimes hard to measure the results of the training provided, and to check if learners fully acquired the skills transmitted, and are using it in their everyday work life.

As the publisher would no longer have to invest a significant sum in a print run that may not sell, rather opting to print a smaller run with less risk of profit loss, there would be no need to inflate the price in order to guarantee a return on the investment from the publisher.

The reasoning behind this is two-fold: first, the employer - match can be considered as a guaranteed Return on Investment — so for example, for an employer that matches 75 %, for every dollar you contribute you already have earned a 75 % return up to the employer's Return on Investment — so for example, for an employer that matches 75 %, for every dollar you contribute you already have earned a 75 % return up to the employer's return up to the employer's limit.

Stable and accessible: Other financial vehicles, like mutual funds, can post losses on your investment, depending on market conditions, while accounts that guarantee higher returns often come with additional restrictions on your access to funds, as with CDs.

Pensions are tough on governments as we see now, because they guarantee a certain rate of return regardless of what the pension's investment's return.

As always, there are no guarantees when it comes to investing in the stock market, however, robo - advisors, such as Betterment, claim they can improve the return on investment of the average do - it - yourself investor by 4 % or morAs always, there are no guarantees when it comes to investing in the stock market, however, robo - advisors, such as Betterment, claim they can improve the return on investment of the average do - it - yourself investor by 4 % or moras Betterment, claim they can improve the return on investment of the average do - it - yourself investor by 4 % or more.

I agree that youngsters should focus on equities for the most part, but to not buy fixed - income investments for short - term goals and as a guaranteed return when markets drop and low positions make liquidity a bit tight is irresponsible.

Taxpayers loan the government money in the form of purchasing a bond and in return the federal reserves guarantee a return on investment, as well as the principal not being diminished.

On the other hand, keeping all your money in guaranteed investments such as a savings account is unrecommended for a long - term objective since inflation will likely wipe out your returns and the opportunity cost would simply be too large.

Before you make an investment in these products, you need to assess the risk that the issuer or the provider of the capital guarantee or protection could fail to meet some or all of their obligations to you as an investor (for example, their obligation to return all your capital on the investment maturity date).

Unlike other long - term investments the income from solar electricity is also guaranteed and tax - free, which compares favorably to savings and pensions investments, where the economic crisis has resulted in low returns.4 There's also no need to fear the UK's inclement weather, as solar panels depend on daylight, not sunlight, to produce energy for your household.»

The rooms were sold as investments based upon a guaranteed 10 % return on investment and also with a guarantee that the sellers would repurchase the hotel rooms after 4 or 5 years at the sale price.

These assumed rates of return are not guaranteed and they are not upper or lower limits of what you might get back, as the value of your policy is dependent on a number of factors including future investment performance.

These assumed rates of return 8 % and 4 %, are not guaranteed and they are not upper or lower limits of what you might get back as the value of your policy is dependent on a number of factors including future investment performance.

These assumed rates of returns are not guaranteed and they are not the upper or lower limits of what you might get back as the value of your policy is dependent on a number of factors including future investment performance.

As the name suggests a guaranteed return plan offers decent returns on your investment and provides protection against all unexpected events, both at the same time.

A money back plan is ideal for people who want a guaranteed return on their investments and are looking for regular payouts at the same time in addition to an insurance cover for themselves for the same money they are putting in as premium.

These assumed rates of return are not guaranteed and they are not the upper or lower limits of what you might get back as the value of your policy is dependent on a number of factors including future investment performance.

Moreover, these are not guaranteed and they are not the upper or lower limits of returns of the Fund Option chosen under your policy, as the performance of the funds depend on a variety of factors including future investment performance.

These are not guaranteed and they are not the upper or lower limits of returns of the Funds selected in your policy, as the performance of the Funds is dependent on a number of factors including future investment performance).

The company claims to be registered in the United States and purports to guarantee «outstanding returns» by «working as an investment pool, collecting multiple lower value investments and grouping them into one single HUGE investment, using those funds to trade on the stock market» — without any actual information as to how they use investors money.