A delegation of Canadian civil society groups, including CCLA, was in Geneva last month to participate in a UPR pre-session — CCLA updated States on our concerns about Canada's actions regarding rights and liberties
guaranteed by international law and binding upon Canada.
Not exact matches
Their human rights must be respected and upheld, as
guarantee under the Peruvian Political Constitution, the precautionary measures granted
by Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) on May 5, 2014, the United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights, and as supported
by the latest determination of the
International Criminal Court in The Hague to prosecute company executives, politicians and other individuals under international law for crimes linked to land grabbing and environmental
International Criminal Court in The Hague to prosecute company executives, politicians and other individuals under
international law for crimes linked to land grabbing and environmental
international law for crimes linked to land grabbing and environmental destruction.
In its judgment, the SCC explained that even though EU
law is not itself part of the constitutional canon, «both
international treaties and agreements, including European secondary legislation, may provide valuable interpretative criteria of the meaning and scope of the rights and freedoms that the Constitution recognises,» taking into account the interpretive decisions rendered «
by the bodies of
guarantee established under those same
international treaties and agreements.»
Fourth, it remains questionable whether the autonomy of EU
law must really be secured
by imposing on non-Member States that they have to expressly
guarantee the respect of the monopoly on dispute settlement of the CJEU within the EU in the provisions of an
international agreement.
While the Human Rights Committee has not determined that «extraordinary» tribunals or «special» courts are incompatible with the requirement that tribunals be established
by law, it has taken the position that the provision is intended to ensure that any court, be it «extraordinary» or not, should genuinely afford the accused the full
guarantees of fair trial set out in Article 14 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
«The necessity to
guarantee the interpretation and application of European Union
law and not harmonized national
law to the ECJ or a supreme court can not be given away
by an
international treaty.
Rather, the right to negotiate is a reflection of traditional
law and as such is an inherent property and cultural right protected
by the
international guarantee of substantive equality.