Sentences with phrase «guaranteed money left»

His cap hit is pretty high and he has no guaranteed money left.

Shields also has a $ 16 million club option for 2019 that includes a $ 2 million buyout, meaning there is roughly $ 57.8 million in guaranteed money left on his contract.

Not exact matches

@josh37 I think what Hafiz was tryna say is pay good money / salaries and see how u can lure players to join... Nasri left a guaranteed starting place to get permanent sub position... Fcuk, it wasn't for trophies, but to get more MONEY!!money / salaries and see how u can lure players to join... Nasri left a guaranteed starting place to get permanent sub position... Fcuk, it wasn't for trophies, but to get more MONEY!!MONEY!!!!!!.

Just something to think about and to kick around... Arsenal would be a great club if AW was replaced, the Directors left The team was totally replaced... because they're all AW's players and thus mediocre We could find another T. Henry, Vieira, Pires and co We could use all the money to buy the best players in the world Just these small changes would GUARANTEE a continuous stream of PL and EC wins Shame our club would still be stuck with its c..

As to renegotiating his contract, Peterson himself wants to do that because he wants more guaranteed money, otherwise, If he was happy with the money he was being paid, there's no need to want to leave Minnesota (sorry, but «hurt feelings» are not a reason to breach a multimillion dollar contract unless you're a two year old).

pay buttload of money and get Ibrahimovic... Hes proven on all levels... Hes got another good 2 years left in him... EPL guaranteed my friends..

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Unless his price of # 80 is met then we should not sell.If he's however sold for that money I believe we'd be getting the better deal because even with Sanchez they are still not guaranteed the title.According to our representative at GOAL by mutual consent he's told his agent he wants to leave.Also that # 400,000 a week story has always been a lie.If he stays he's only trying to honour his contract and leave for free next summer.It's very likely he will leave for free if he stays for this season.I hope he at least signs a one year contract so that we can sell him for a reasonable amount instead of losing him for free.

It seems they've been happy to try and prove themselves this year, knowing if they don't they could probably leave for a considerable amount of money for someone who is not a guaranteed starter.

Figures from the right and left of the party, including former education and home secretary Charles Clarke, have put their weight behind radical plans to increase NI and guarantee that the money raised would pay for spiralling NHS and social care costs.

Paterson said the budget department left the figure off its tally because it isn't guaranteed money.

We offer the money - back guarantee that leaves you in a win - win situation.

So, yes, in return for guaranteed lifetime payments, you no longer have the ability to tap into that money for emergencies or unexpected expenses or to leave it for your heirs.

Growth - oriented investments can lose as well as gain money, and even a 100 - percent US government guaranteed deposit account could leave you vulnerable to losing ground to inflation over time.

Any leftover money from a permanent plan becomes a guaranteed legacy you will leave for your family.

For example, in return for the guarantee of lifetime payments, you typically give up all or most of your access to the savings you've invested in the annuity, which means you may no longer be able to dip into that money for emergencies or unexpected expenses or leave it to your heirs.

Of course I can't guarantee that is universally the case, but if you leave and come back 5 minutes later, or tomorrow, or next week, it's extremely likely that they'll still take your money for the original price.

While OpenInvest (or indeed any financial advisor) could never promise a guaranteed steady rate of return, the alternative option of leaving your money idling in a low - interest savings (or a no - interest checking) account may do less for your financial future.

Many individuals buy guaranteed life insurance as a last resort to leave just enough money behind to loved ones in order to take care of medical expenses and funeral costs.

That means the actuaries assume money left in the plan is effectively guaranteed to earn a 3.5 % to 4 % return compared to the lump sum you would get from commuting.

Problem is, you will also be leaving behind your hard - won income guarantee, and, given how fast you could be burning through your money, you might not have enough funds left to start over with a different plan.

Thus, it makes sense to roll the dividends back into the policy by purchasing additional whole life insurance so that your cash value grows, compounded by a guaranteed interest rate and dividend growth and your death beenfit grows, so you leave as much money as possible to your estate.

At the same time, our mortality virtually guarantees that most people will leave some money on the table when they die.

This way you will have some guaranteed income, and the rest money, you can leave for growth.

100 % Satisfaction Guarantee ** Every Tarriss RFID Money Belt / Waist Stash is individually tested for defects before it leaves the factory.

This site guarantees great places to stay with enough money left over to shop, dine out and explore the island and its cultural attributes.

Love him, hate him or leave him... his controversial perspectives on business, marketing and the inner game of success will entertain, offend or piss you off — guaranteed, or your money back.

If you want to leave some extra money to a child, grandchild, or perhaps a charity when they eventually pass away, a guaranteed universal life policy can be an efficient way to do.

It's one of the only ways that you can guarantee that your family has the money that they need to pay off any bills or debts that you would leave behind.

In your opinion, Should I do the reduced payed up quote and let the insurance company have the $ 5,900 so I can be guaranteed 33,000 whole life to leave for my family or take the cash value and start investing and build my wealth / savings and burial expenses / money to pass down to generations later in life can come from that.

Any leftover money from a permanent plan becomes a guaranteed legacy you will leave for your family.

Annuity death benefit strategies primarily involve riders that you can attach to the policy at the time of application that guarantees an annual percentage yield that can be used to leave money to your heirs.

The risk of outliving your money, and the risk of being able to leave a guaranteed death benefit.

The riders available of money back policy are as follows: • Critical Illness rider: This rider offers a guaranteed sum if the Insured is diagnosed with some critical illness including major organ failure, coronary diseases, different types of cancer etc. • Accident rider: In case the policy holder's unexpected death due to accident the nominee receives a sum assured • Disability benefit rider: This type is rider helps in case the policy holder is left paralyzed due to some major accident in his life.

Thus, it makes sense to roll the dividends back into the policy by purchasing additional whole life insurance so that your cash value grows, compounded by a guaranteed interest rate and dividend growth and your death beenfit grows, so you leave as much money as possible to your estate.

With permanent life insurance you can be guaranteed to leave money to those who matter most to you no matter when you go.

And while Term insurance is great for protecting people for a specific time — like until kids are thru college or a mortgage is paid off — most people want life insurance for their entire lives... That's why there's permanent insurance... so you can be guaranteed to leave money to those who matter most to you no matter when you go.

The most common reasons to purchase a guaranteed universal life insurance policy include: leaving an inheritance, providing money to your surviving family to cover the cost of your final expenses, and to protect your estate from estate taxes with an irrevocable life insurance trust.

Top up for Guaranteed Pension and Aviva Group Leave Encashment premiums, is an extra amount of money that you can pay at any time during the policy term.

Surrender value of Future Generali Pension Guarantee and Future Generali Leave Encashment is the amount of money that will be provided by the insurance company in case you want to surrender the policy before maturity.

Surrender value of Aegon Life Leave Encashment and Guaranteed Income Advantage is the amount of money that will be provided by the insurance company in case you want to surrender the policy before maturity.

There's no money - back guarantee, so if you do purchase this course and find that it leaves as much to be desired as the website does, you'll be out $ 59.99 and you'll still have to find another course.

Surrender value of Aegon Life Leave Encashment and Future Generali Pension Guarantee is the amount of money that will be provided by the insurance company in case you want to surrender the policy before maturity.

Top up for Kotak Leave Encashment and Future Generali Pension Guarantee premiums, is an extra amount of money that you can pay at any time during the policy term.

With our money back guarantee scheme, there is very little that we've left for you to worry about.

Even if it does sell, it can be guaranteed, that if you sold it without staging that you left money on the table.