Sentences with phrase «guaranteed under the state constitution»

I can't cite chapter and verse, but it's my understanding that a state pension is guaranteed under the State Constitution.

BRUCE KARAM: We want to be able to provide the sound basic education, which is guaranteed under the state constitution...

If we are guaranteed under our state constitution to have a bargaining unit to negotiate with the local school district for our salary schedule, and the guidelines for determining our retirement, doesn't it take a constitutional amendment not a state law to change that?

Not exact matches

«The PDP holds that the governor and the APC are jittery and unpopular of going into the grass roots elections in the state, thus the decisions to control the councils by nomenclature of executive secretaries and sole administrators, which are alien and offensive to the provisions of our Constitution, which under section 7 guarantees only democratically elected local government council administrations.»

Under the state Constitution, a defined - benefit pension is absolutely guaranteed.

WHEREAS, this legislation is viewed by many citizens of the State of New York as being extremely controversial as those citizens view this Legislation as infringing upon their rights guaranteed to them under the second Amendment of the United State Constitution; and

Prof. Dankofa, among other things, in suit KDH / KAD / 236 / 2018 is praying the court to «declare that the action of the respondents (Kaduna State Government and Kaduna Geographic Information Service, KADGIS) in arrogating to themselves the power to punitively sanction the Applicants (Hunkuyi and his Company, Muna Investment Ltd) property, even if the Applicants were purportedly in default of payment of either ground rent or land use charge or for any other reason constitute a gross violation of Applicant Fundamental Human Right guaranteed under section 43 (1) and 46 (1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) and therefore illegal, unconstitutional, null and void.»

Reed is also less troublesome to Lindseth to the extent that the court's decision was based on students» equal protection rights under the state constitution rather than on the guarantee of an adequate education.

The plaintiffs, a group of students and school districts, sued, arguing that several state statutes stood in the way of all students receiving the education guaranteed to them under the state constitution.

The Wright v. New York case was first filed in 2014, when nine families from across the state brought suit against the State of New York and others, claiming that teacher tenure, dismissal, and quality - blind layoff laws deprive New York children of their right to a sound basic education as guaranteed under the New York State Constitustate brought suit against the State of New York and others, claiming that teacher tenure, dismissal, and quality - blind layoff laws deprive New York children of their right to a sound basic education as guaranteed under the New York State ConstituState of New York and others, claiming that teacher tenure, dismissal, and quality - blind layoff laws deprive New York children of their right to a sound basic education as guaranteed under the New York State ConstituState Constitution.

In 2005, the Public School Forum published the results of its eleventh biennial study group, offering detailed strategies to provide every child in the state with an equal opportunity to obtain a sound basic education, as guaranteed under the North Carolina Constitution.1 Public School Forum (2005).

I Wish to Say grew out of Sheryl Oring's concern that not enough voices were being heard about the state - of - affairs in this country and her belief in the value of free expression that is guaranteed under our Constitution.

Iannicelli and Brandt are being harassed by the Colorado district attorney's office for exercising their freedom of speech, which is supposedly guaranteed under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

In my opinion the ECJ's decision in Taricco I that national courts must disapply the rules of statutes of limitations if they prevent Member States from fulfilling their obligations under Article 325 TFEU (in the present case, the relevant Italian legislation) leads to perceiving serious fraud as a crime against the rights and interests of citizens, i.e., against fundamental social human rights guaranteed under Articles 2 and 3 of the Italian Constitution, and hence calls for resolving the conflict within the Italian Constitution by balancing the rights under these articles and the accused's individual rights guaranteed by the legality principle (Art. 25 (2) Const.).

A state court is has the power to enforce greater protections to a person claiming rights, relying on the state's constitution, than those guaranteed under the federal constitution.

[5] In this case, the court while reiterating the availability of some fundamental rights to arrested persons and detainees especially those available under Article 21, further held that «for violation of the Fundamental Rights to life or basic human rights, the defence of sovereign immunity is not available to the state for the established violation of the rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India under Article 21».

Justice Gorsuch argued that partisan gerrymandering claims arise under Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which requires the federal government to «guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,» and which the Court has long dismissed as giving rise only to non-justiciable political questions.

The ECJ's decision that national courts must disapply the rules of statutes of limitations if they prevent Member States from fulfilling their obligations under Article 325 TFEU (in the present case, the relevant Italian legislation) leads to perceiving serious fraud as a crime against the rights and interests of citizens, i.e., against fundamental social human rights guaranteed under Arts. 2 and 3 Const., and hence calls for resolving the conflict within the Italian Constitution by balancing the rights under these articles and the accused's individual rights guaranteed by the legality principle (Art. 25 Const.)

In Walker v Sauvinet, 92 U.S. 90 (1876), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the right to a jury trial guaranteed under the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution did not apply to states.

By taking on the Canadian state, Jeannette Corbiere Lavell, Sandra Lovelace and Yvonne Bédard directly contributed to section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, which was amended in 1983 to guarantee that Aboriginal and treaty rights would be equally accessible to men and women under the law.

Since June 2015, marriage equality has been legal in every state across the U.S.. That's because a Supreme Court ruling determined that marriage is a guaranteed right that is protected under the U.S. Constitution and the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

After their case was consolidated with those of 28 other marriage equality plaintiffs from four states, the Court ruled 5 - 4 on June 26, 2015, that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same - sex couples under the due process and equal protection clauses in the Constitution.