At the Supreme Court level, nine states used
the gubernatorial appointment process with some form of confirmation of candidates by the legislature or another elected body, according to the Brennan Center.
Approximately 90 percent of Minnesota judges are already selected through a commission - based
gubernatorial appointment process — authorized by statute — to fill vacancies that arise between elections, and judicial elections are rarely contested.
Not exact matches
There are several anticipated efforts in 2014 to alter
processes for selecting state court judges, particularly in states with commission - based
gubernatorial appointment of appellate judges.
Instead, lawmakers chose to let Tennesseans weigh in on the issue in 2014, when voters will be asked whether a modified federal
process —
gubernatorial appointment, legislative confirmation, and retention elections — should be used to select appellate judges.
One such trend that was popular several years ago was an effort to expand
gubernatorial authority over the
process, by allowing the governor to choose more members of the judicial nominating commission and giving the governor more nominees from which to make
appointments.
IAALS Online recently summarized anticipated efforts in 2014 to alter
processes for selecting state court judges, and a recent article in the ABA Journal honed in on a common trend in a handful of these states with commission - based
gubernatorial appointment of appellate judges.
The proposal would establish a federal selection
process for appellate judges —
gubernatorial appointment with confirmation by both houses of the legislature (the «plus»).