Not exact matches
we are a NATION of INDIviduaLS... if you have that mindset ruined
by prayer... then it doesnot stop at prayer... so IM
guessing your
argument is not really honest... everyone is an individual... have you been to town council metings?
I have this
argument with my dad everyday, I really don't care we are the fifth richest club in the world, football in my opinion is all about what happens on the pitch not in the accounting department, we as fans were sold a dream
by the people at the top of our club including wenger that basically said after Ashburton grove was built we'd compete on the pitch with the best in Europe,
guess what we haven't, the only thing we've done is make a rich American and his associates even richer, wenger has been a willing participant in this.
She turns these examples of rage on the page into playful performance art, as when her ultra-professional news anchor trades technology vs. humanity
arguments with a rain - soaked field reporter — played
by guess who?
Basic introduction of
arguments why people would smoke or not supported
by visuals, so pupils can
guess the reason.
I'd
guess he means research characterized
by measurement and research expert Gerald Bracey as «a circular
argument which defines effective teachers as those who raise test scores, then uses test score gains to determine who's an effective teacher.»
I'm
guessing you're still quite young, since you think you're achieving something for yourself here, but you're only being childishly nonsensical, you keep repeating the same crap, no counter
arguments, no explanations, only long, pointless text about you trying hard to prove I'm a blind fanboy
by... repeating that I'm a blind fanboy.
I
guess I have to consider any
argument made
by someone who calls me homie: — RRB -, but do you really think that human additions to carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
by the middle of the 21st century would be reasonably interpreted as from now?
I
guess I'd add that this is understandable, given that the denier camp really doesn't have much actual science to use as ammunition or to build their
arguments on, and thus they tend to wage their campaign
by cherrypicking data, or seeking to attack narrow and often out - of - context passages found in scientific papers or in simplified postings about those papers found on sites like Skeptical Science.