The Question refers instead to the representation of
guilty criminals who have committed acts of violence or depravity.
Come on people these are pets, to be imporntant members of a new family, not locked up in cages
like guilty criminals.
That the intent most likely would be to cover up the defendant's presumed guilt; and further presuming that
guilty criminal defendants are typically very truthful with their defense attorneys especially --
And we know that Jesus was not guilty, even though by all outward appearances, He looked exactly like
a guilty criminal dying on a God - forsaken cross.
Yes, if you were a Jew living 2000 years ago, and if you saw Jesus hanging on the cross, you most likely would have thought that He was
a guilty criminal who had come under the curse of God.
As outsiders, when we look upon the appearance of God in the Old Testament, we see
a guilty criminal who is doing things that nobody should ever do.