Sentences with phrase «guilty people who»

They put us all at risk from guilty people who are free to victimize again.

«There are no innocent people in the world just waiting to hear the Gospel; there are guilty people who need the Gospel,» I heard David Platt, author and pastor, say in a sermon one Sunday morning.

Not exact matches

It's not that these men aren't guilty -; they are -; but that the system is biased towards over-incarceration and sentencing to people of color and has a byzantine set of rules that often elongate the sentencing of those who don't have resources to fight them.

And I'd been guilty of perpetuating this sort of prejudice by perpetuating stereotypes of psychics as shifty, exotic people or as being unreal, unable to be found as mothers or neighbors or activists like Emily, who's active in social justice - based causes, particularly the fight for transgender equal rights.

I don't want to be the one who says guilty until proven innocent, [but] when that many people come out and have similar complaints and it became such a tainted situation, there was no way we could move forward.»

«On the other hand, there's a difference between mere difference of opinion and doing business with people who you believe are guilty of real wrongdoing.

The phone records may help convict a guilty party, but they also likely call police attention to the phone numbers, identities and habits of people who may not have anything to do with the crime being investigated.

Mueller's team has also banked guilty pleas from five people who have not yet been sentenced.

As a result, we have people who are afraid to be positive when in the public eye, secreting away their guilty pleasure long ideas like DVD copies of The Notebook.

Five of these people have already pleaded guilty — the latest being former Trump campaign staffer Rick Gates, who signed a plea deal and committed to cooperate with Mueller's investigation Friday.

Any person who breaches the Act, the regulations, a term or condition of a licence, or an order or direction of the Minister, is guilty of an offence (s 7) subject to a penalty of not more than $ 10 million (in the case of a corporation) or $ 1 million (in the case of an individual), for each day or part thereof that the offence is committed.

He leverages the objective - subjective distinction to note that a person who commits what is objectively a mortal sin might not be subjectively guilty of that sin, and therefore may be excused from full blame for it.

the torment about realizing you were wrong about which medicine to use on a patient and they died, or wrong about a person being guilty who you sentenced to prison where they were killed.

The Bible should not be twisted to make it fit the things people feel guilty and uncomfortable ----- This has been done throughout the history of the bible, and primarily by the people who wrote and edited it.

One is guilty of detraction if one «without [an] objectively valid reason, discloses another's faults and failings to persons who did not know them» (no. 2477).

I have also seen people who turned away from the Church and / or broke a moral or ethical standard of the Church and they feel so guilty they think people in the Church are judging them when they are not.

But in abusive situations, the people who do the wrong thing (the bully) are also the ones who make the others feel guilty.

I have also discovered that those people who use the «standards» and «excellence» language most are those who attempt to make oppressed people feel guilty for their own victimization.

You also correctly point out that some people who were accused were not altogether guilty.

Even the people who are glad of a not guilty verdict generally agree Zimmerman is an idiot.

You have not contributed to the discussion you have framed the matter in a way that condemns people who are not guilty.

Religion News Service: Truck driver pleads guilty to setting Ohio mosque on fire An Indiana man who said he gets all his information about Islam from talk radio and Fox News has pleaded guilty to setting fire to a mosque in September, but local Muslims voiced concern there may be more people like him out there.

Now try: «people who don't know any better» or «not guilty by reason of insanity due to indoctrination.»

Our commitment to the rights of our innocent suspect does have a cost: suffering imposed on other innocent people who are no more guilty than our wrongly accused person.

the media, gov» t, retail, etc... Manipulation is also used a lot by people who belive in something and when they think other people should believe in the same thing... We've all been guilty of this... at least I have anyways... keep on rocking the boat Dave!

And they're the loudest people in the church.And I am pretty sure thye're among the followers of Bishop Eddie Long of Atlanta, who looks very guilty.

What does it matter when we die what is important is what we do with our life now.The struggles people find themselves is because of living a sinful lifestyle you cant play with fire and not get burnt there are consequences.Jesus wants to bring forgiveness and healing and remove the guilt and shame that you are feeling.Ive have been there i was just as guilty i do nt believe theres a big screen that replays our life if it is it, it will be about what we have done for God as our sins are covered under the blood of Jesus.The judgement for christians is that we must give an account of what we did for Jesus while we were here did we make the most of opportunities given to tell others to reach out others with his love.Mat 25:14 - 30 the Parable of the talents talks about judgement and for me it is all about what we do for Jesus the ones who are faithfull in the small things are set over much.The one who did nt use his talent that God gave him was punished for his lack of faith.So for those who are struggling with sin and life Jesus loves you and has a plan for your life just trust him to help you and he will.To be fair its wont be easy you will have to make some hard choices but he promises to help you through its all about choosing him over choosing what we think best because he knows whats best for us.Its important the choice you make as it will impact your life for eternity.brentnz

Its an interesting and concerning that people can and do live in information silos (including me) and are kept their by leaders of institutional church who want them to think in certain ways like you must come to sunday church and made to feel guilty if they do nt.

I doubt if such a presentation of the Christian gospel is other than a palliative for those who are insecure, as well as offering a sort of reassurance to people who have been induced (often by quite dubious techniques) to feel enormously guilty about themselves.

Kierkegaard defends himself against the apparently Pelagian implications of this thought by stressing that even though each individual sins through his own disobedience (sin is not a category of necessity), nevertheless, in this act of disobedience he reveals his solidarity with Adam and Eve and all other persons in history, who together make up the collective human race which, in Adam, stands guilty before God.

I've received moving notes in response to other pieces I've written on Charlie Gard — including from people who wondered whether, because of their decision to remove a ventilator for their child, they were guilty of euthanasia by omission.

Sam Chandler, secretary of the Anglican Society for the Welfare of Animals (ASWA) made comments following a new report that reveals 9 out of 10 people who are found guilty of animal cruelty don't end up in jail.

Or the eighteen men who were killed when the tower fell on them at Siloam — do you imagine they were more guilty than all the other people living in Jerusalem?

Maybe it doesn't mater to you, but one thing does mater, and should never be compared: life of a man who is persecuted for his faith in his Lord and Savior, and one who was found guilty of murder, shedding the blood of innocent person.

Once Jesus was dead and buried, his followers, who were also Christian Pastors, went to work offending more and more people who continued to practice the Church of Israel, Judaism and Mosaic Covenant to a certain point that emboldened factions that would find them guilty of sedition and condemn the followers of Jesus Christ, who were more than willing to put them to death as well, usually by MOB RULE.

To stand up for the guilty, to stand up for sinners, to stand up for people who are hurting and accused.

If God uses hurricanes, tsunamis, bridge collapses and other such events to destroy the guilty and innocent alike, then it's no reach to conclude that he also ordered ancient Israel to slaughter their enemies, that he caused the earth to open and swallow people who disobeyed and so on.

The unspoken assumption is that acceptance is already there, despite all human rejection, and that the person who is neurotically guilty, anxious, and depressed does not have proper self - knowledge.

People who say that observable complexity is proof of design and therefore a designer are only guilty of wishful thinking and do not have a true graps on logical thought.

It is gratifying that, since I wrote «Scandal Time III,» many more priests and lay people are speaking up in defense of priests who are falsely accused, denied due process, or guilty, repentant, and forgiven in connection with offenses that have nothing — absolutely nothing — to do with the imperative purpose of protecting children from sexual abuse.

Even if you think that their lifestyle is sinful, why would a church choose to condemn and reject LGBT people, while at the same time love and accept people who are guilty of other sins?

I say all this because it seems to me that many lay - people (who might be excused) and many clergy (who can not be excused) are guilty of great confusion on this point; they try to defend too much.

Critics exploded in high dudgeon because he wrote to one priest who was apparently guilty of serial abuses that his ministry had been a blessing to «many people.»

Poor people and poor nations who passively accept their situation are not guilty of any crime.

>> >» People who didn't even exist...... Where is the proof you are guilty of what Adam and Eve did?

He had no admiration for ministers who preach «about other people, and sins of other people, instead of addressing them and saying, «You are guilty of these sins,» and, «The Lord requires this of you.»..

«Also I'm associated in the media and public with a number of people who have been accused, and in some cases pleaded guilty, to child abuse in a relatively small school within the same time.»

He goes on to say that the person who dipped his hand in the dish with him is the guilty person.

Who would have thought that Jesus would be guilty of infidelity by loving people other than his own!

Maybe the people who feel guilty about doubting Jesus will displace their anger at themselves against any skeptic that raises the possibility and causes the doubts to resurface.