Sentences with phrase «guy than a bad one»

Not exact matches

It's much easier than selling drugs or stealing cars and a lot less risky for the bad guys.»

«He has a better relationship with Putin than anyone else Trump could have chosen, and before we dismiss that as a bad thing, we should consider the benefits of better communications with a guy that has a demonstrated ability to make all kinds of trouble for Washington.»

Not every guy is a boots guy, but if you're one, you could do much worse than the «Carter.»

But rather than delving into that, was Shulman's statement about «no longer chasing bad guys» really an exaggeration?

He defended his son, saying, «I've seen a lot worse things happen than a guy taking some glasses.

We've stopped countless attacks by finding one company that has faced a certain vulnerability or piece of malware and then spread that herd immunity out to the rest of the companies much more quickly than the bad guys can pivot and break into multiple companies.

The idea of parity, that «we're no worse than the next guy» is being blown up by new entrants with new business models that aren't held to the same old standards and aren't doing business in the same old way.

I simply decided to take a chance after decades of the bad unenjoyable variety, I married the guy a year, who is better in every facet than my first.

Nothing worse than a guy who claims he would help, but doesn't.

I was no better or worse than the other guys.

This guy is no better or worse than Harold Campings.

You guys are worse than the Ja - panese and Turks in recognition of history.

The lawyer of this guy is in bad shape hiding some thing that is bigger than him... the issue is bigger than just a killing the issue is bigger than you imagine... and can read that on the face of the lawyer answering to media questions....

The people who read this blog think worse of Obama than the swing guy does — and studies back me up on this.The real charge against Obama that's sticking like glue is that he's CLUELESS — not that he's an EVILDOER.

Taking this out of context is worse heresy than judging someone else like this guy.

Option two: Using the ring, you fly under its power across the ocean in less than sixty minutes (it takes that long because you haven't figured out how to fold space yet), subdue and restrain the bad guys, and turn them over to those equipped to deal with them.

We like to accuse the other guy of being worse than us but tain't so.

In one match, I played a guy who was actually worse than I was.

But, other than in old westerns, it's awfully hard telling the good guys from the bad guys.

Some come across as bad guys, some as good guys, and more than a few as well - meaning idealists who somehow got themselves mired in the muck and just did not know how to get out.

So who are more «bad guys» than the other?

Perhaps more disturbing than anything else is Weigel's good guy / bad guy scenario» his assumption that the United States holds the moral high ground, Iraq being the villain.

I am not lessened by those that do not believe what i believe, i served this country and spent a year in Iraq, many of my fellow soldiers were Christian but i served beside Atheists, mormons, Catholics, wiccans, Jews, even a satanist, yes a satanist, and guess what, we were friends, I cared deeply for them and they for me, These were the guys that protected me so i could sleep, my life was in their hands and theirs in mine... I think you all have a very bad idea of what a Christian is, i think you have no idea what you're talking about when you judge us all as a religion... you need to get out of your house and off of your computer chair and learn what people are really about... Maybe then you will understand Humanity rather than just secularizing everybody and hating them... you are sad people, yet my beliefs teach me to pray for you, and hope that you come to reason...

Our last 2 pastors were much worse than this guy, I live on the other side of the country.

80 % of our immunity lies in our gut, so getting more good guys (good bacteria) than bad guys (bad bacteria) is crucial.

I figured I was safe since political dramas aren't typically my thing, and I couldn't possibly see Bradley Whitford (aka Josh Lyman) as anyone other than the bad guy in Billy Madison.

People killed the MCW trade... and then it turned out that we got a lottery pick for a guy who, two years later, was barely playing on an atrocious Chicago Bulls team and, this year, is averaging fewer than 5 points in 16 minutes a night for a bad Hornets team.

It's still bad, but now we get to see if the guy who is joining his 4th team this year is better than our current CF.

If and when Wenger leaves he will likely leave this club in a worse position than he found it which is a pitty for a guy who likes to pride himslef on all the change he brought.

In the NFL, even the worst guys you see on the field are usually better than average in most cases, and by better than average I mean in size, ability and technique.

And don't get me started on the Academy (which I follow very closely) because these guys are in worse shape than the first squad.

a good indication of the harshness of the tackle is the commentary on MOTD where whoever it was just saw a clumsy tackle and nothing more... the elbowing in the face of mustafi (twice) was actually way more violent and went unpunished... though i hate the blaming the ref mentality of wenger the guy yesterady was worse than poor

@john0711 I was asking of players worse than Giroud for Arsenal in terms of finishing.I consisered finishing only.Out of your list when all are in form you can argue that Walcott is better.But in terms of finishing he's the worst of that lot.Only Gervinho's finishing is worse.The guy doesn't deserve this club and so does many of our current players.Face reality he's odinary and if you were a manager and wanted success would you put in a # 30 bid for Giroud?Yet his stats suggest he may be worth # 30 showing the contradiction between stats and real life.The earlier we get some average players out of our club and stop defending the indefensible the better for us all.With this kind of mentality success will be far from this club.

Every single one of them, from the last guy on the bench, to the corner outfielders, to the first baseman, to the backup first baseman, to the fourth outfielder, to the third baseman, is worse than the league average.

Can this guy be so much worse than Flamini?

And rather than make a bad trade, says Schuerholz, «it might be better to finish the season, come in next year having guys more comfortable and get off to a good start.»

If saying that he was terrible even before signing him, then blasting Pace for overpaying for him, and repeatedly telling people that he is worse than Cutler makes me a Glennon Guy, then fine.

The Padres are probably marginally worse than that, due to the fact that they strike out a lot, putting pressure on the guy with 2 outs to get a hit (or hope for a passed ball / wild pitch).

Well guys, the Rockets really can't be playing much worse than they are right now.

I'm just looking through the list of Red Wings trades over Blashill's tenure has HC, and I'm seeing a bunch of guys who, after they were traded, put up worse numbers than with the Wings.

Xhaka does not deserve to be in the lineup more than anyone.As bad as Ozil is at least awe can say form is temporary class is permanent though he also does not deserve to start.Why is Coquelin not playing instead of Xhaka?Even Elneny is a better buy than Xkaka.I don't care what kind of performance Xhaka has today.Why should a player be allowed to go off form and still be in the starting eleven while other players should be taking his place?Poor management from.Wenger.It's not fair at all.Mark my words that Xhaka won't last in the lineup when Wenger is gone and I can see some youngsters like Maitland - Niles and Kelechi Nwakali surpassing him in the future.The guy can't defend to even save his own life.

Although I agree that the refereeing is atrocious and yes we do get some awful decisions go against us but more often than not we bring it on ourselves, are defending is beyond pathetic I don't necessarily think they're bad players I just think the guys are not trained to defend..

And I also think it's a bad idea to draft hoping to avoid busts; better to aim to find that guy who will offer a strong return, and do that more often than other teams.

Nate's been held down on the bottom in at least 5 of his loses by guys who were way smaller and worse wrestlers than Woodley.

Cech is not so much better than Ospina (and is worse according to stats) that he warrants replacing the guy so he will NOT come to Arsenal to sit on the bench.

Phil takes all sorts of risks, frequently screws up, doesn't have the personal - trainer body that so many of the other top guys do and says what he's feeling (for better or worse) rather than hide behind bland, impersonal corporate - speak.

The bad guys would wear black, and their motives wouldn't be any more complicated than «I'm a dick,» just like in every Star Wars movie.

It sounds worse than it is when you hear the whole thing, but guys just need to know their part.

Don't let that all distract you from the fact that Styles is the one guy capable of making a Shane match memorable for more than just whatever ridiculous, bad idea Shane has that involves jumping off something tall.

Not bad for a kid playing against guys two to five years older than him.