Sentences with phrase «guys would rather»

It's this same old wrestling match that most guys would rather stay engaged in and risk getting pinned than break down and admit that their wife and children, or the business they -LSB-...]

A couple of weeks ago I did a poll on Instagram Stories and asked if you guys would rather see more holiday style and outfits for men and women on the blog in the lead up to the holidays, or if you're over all of that holiday hype and would rather see more general winter style on here.

Many guys would rather have a few drinks on the weekend than cheat with food that's not a part of their diet plan.

Women like you anna are why guys would rather stay single.

For the U.S. having to send out 7 or 8 very solid players and 3 or 4 guys you would rather have replaced by someone else makes winning a World Cup nearly impossible.

You know, the guys in fiction (and in life) who can kick your tail seven ways but more violent - minded people wouldn't know it because these guys would rather let someone beat them up than to throw a punch and betray their principles.

These guys would rather pick up cans alongside the road than build at this site.

These guys would rather wait — and then boom, just get it out.»

Although with that being said granted that he is a premier league player we would have to adjust for inflation, so he will definitely command a transfer fee exceeding # 45 Million however from our perspective with us looking to offload a few of our players, who retrospectively are being looked at by Everton Ospina, Walcott, Gibbs, Ox and Campbell it would provide us with the perfect opportunity to launch a bid upwards of # 40 Million and a player exchange I may be getting ahead of myself but f we were to get rid of any of those guys I'd rather it be in a deal to a team, that couldn't provide a threat to our title ambitions whilst it simultaneously being a deal that advantages all parties.

Guys I'd rather have make the selection; Dawk, Eric Allen, Troy Vincent, Jeremiah trotter, Bobby Taylor, Westbrook, Cunningham, Mike quick....

For instance, the guy would rather chat than video chat, but the girl would rather choose video chat, so they can see each other.

Not exact matches

Wouldn't it be better to get the guys to squish over a little rather than telling the women to stay put?

Some guys wanted to do things their way, rather than keep to our franchising system, which ensured that customers had the same experience everywhere.

Click (buy online) and pick (drive to the store to get it) has become amazingly popular — especially with moms who'd rather throw the kids in the car and make three quick pickups at her favorite stores, without parking, instead of sitting at home and hoping for the delivery guy to show.

Rather than having a reputation for being «that guy or gal» no one wants to be around, why not be that guy or gal everyone can't wait to see by buying an extra latte every morning at your favorite coffee shop and randomly give it away to a new person.

All of this means that stores like Holt Renfrew are making an unprecedented play for the male consumer, targeting sharply dressed clothes - horse types like Sinclair, as well as more reluctant luxury customers — guys who care about appearance but would far rather spend time in Radio Shack then Ralph Lauren.

In the face of the possible Panda Bear Market we discussed here yesterday, it seems that the guys who pull the levers in China have opted to prop up stocks rather than let nature take it's course.

That's nice, but after reading about the guy in the Bible I'd rather not take him up on the invitation.

So, some guy built a robot that you can purchase to be there for you when you die, in case you'd rather spend your last breath with a machine than with those you love most.

The guy old guy said he wasn't going to carry around that kind of cash and that he would rather keep giving her a personal check.

Yes, good points, but I would rather not reinforce this guy's serious (and not benign) delusions by seeming to give credence to them.

It amazes me that Americans would rather elect a drunk, a philanderer, and a pot - smoking revolutionary rather than a guy that actually is faithful to his wife, has done no drugs, doesn't drink alcohol, and has actually had a job that created tens of thousands of jobs.

And this time, just for old times sake, rather than argue, we decided to humor this guy, and we threw our nets on the other side of the boat — and wouldn't you know it — we caught so many fish, we couldn't draw the net into the boat!

I'd rather initially be paid less than be told I'm being paid more but getting the same amount because the rest is going to a guy who's family has been on welfare for 2 generations.

It basically talks about how many men become Christians, lose what shreds of masculinity they had, and become passive «nice guys» rather than active, tender, and bold good guys.

We would rather believe that there are good guys and bad guys, those who are prone to violence and those who are peace - loving.

Rather I would go with, «stuff happens, some lucky guy and his family knew what to do and survived and now we are all alive because we are descendants from this particular person who was chosen by God».

Utah will go into a stupor as they realize their prayers didn't work and their god and angels don't help and America would rather have a guy the mormons wouldn't let in the building 40 years ago than have the corporate raider in magic undies.

God chose a guy that was steeped in law, to tell us that it is not about law (or what we do) but rather it is all about grace (what Christ has done... for us).

It would be rather convenient for communion since the wine is close by, and you wouldn't have guys getting antsy to go home for the football game.

Would you rather have a guy that is honest and truthful then a guy who dances around the Bible half way believing the bible?

You are completely right, these guys are getting all huffy because they really would rather live in a world where there are good guys and bad guys and we're the good guys.

Guys, if you want to attract people for the kingdom of God, it may be better to emulate the good Samaritan who came along side the Jewish man who had been robbed and beaten, and helped him up... rather than those who took up stones to kill the prostitute.

It's like I'd rather see a political ad saying why I should vote for guy A, rather than why I shouldn't vote for guy B.

One - term in office isn't nearly enough time to alleviate the debt crisis going on, and if I had to choose the lesser of two evils, I'd rather have the guy who has his head on his shoulders, and not the guy with a cross up his backside.

I think people relate more to the ideals of V rather than the failure of Guy Fawkes.

I am talking about the formative differences in what religions believe in, and why an evangelical would rather vote for the guy who praises a guy in a big hat but uses the same book, than the guy who — while in every other aspect is unobjectionable — uses the same book but with a new afterward.

Kenneth agree with you totally its not just adams and abrahams problem its us guys we give in to our wives to keep the peace we should learn that the best way is always Gods way not our way or mans way.That to me is the message behind the story.The issue is rather than taking on the burden of his wife Abraham should have taken it back to the Lord its in our weakness he strengthens us.In the end he did what any married man would have done in order to please his wife.We are no different we put our wives or children church work before the Lord just as he did and loo at the consequences that came from that decision the arab nations became a thporn in there side.In my mind we need to put him first always.When we please the Lord he will bless us and our relationships when we do it our way there will be consequences.brentnz

I am not lessened by those that do not believe what i believe, i served this country and spent a year in Iraq, many of my fellow soldiers were Christian but i served beside Atheists, mormons, Catholics, wiccans, Jews, even a satanist, yes a satanist, and guess what, we were friends, I cared deeply for them and they for me, These were the guys that protected me so i could sleep, my life was in their hands and theirs in mine... I think you all have a very bad idea of what a Christian is, i think you have no idea what you're talking about when you judge us all as a religion... you need to get out of your house and off of your computer chair and learn what people are really about... Maybe then you will understand Humanity rather than just secularizing everybody and hating them... you are sad people, yet my beliefs teach me to pray for you, and hope that you come to reason...

«We feel we come up with the best ideas by getting everyone's input rather than have one guy sit down and say, «This is what we're going to do and how we're going to do it,»» Timm notes.

I was a little nervous when the delivery guy was handling the box rather roughly wondering if I would have scrambled eggs.

I asked you guys over the weekend if you'd rather have Valentine's granola or pancakes.

As long as Wenger is around, they have no iota or glimpse of a chance (check out Campbell... Proven talent on the biggest stage and still miserable on the Arsenal bench when we know this is a guy who carried Olympiakos on his own... He rather trust someone like Wilshere who is basically less than average).

Rather, I'd look at 2nd / 3rd to get guys like Sanchez, Price or Ragnow.

I disagree.A wingback can be viewed as a defensive winger.Whether the Ox likes it or not he's been blessed with the qualities of a winger.To me that's his best position.He's only doing well as a wingback because of his attacking abilities.As I said earlier a wingback can be viewed as a sort of defensive winger.That's why CB's who are used as RB or LB can not play wingback.Wingback needs the player to be able to adapt himself like a winger while also being solid defensively.Ox has the attacking part but not the defensive part.With Bellerin we have the best of both worlds.He can attack, defend and also has the speed necessary to play wingback.I fear Ox being played at wingback will cost us when we play teams with tricky wingers.He should rather be challenging Sanchez or Ozil for their positions and not wingback.The guy hates to always have to defend which in truth he can't.

A good variety there, and honestly, I'd rather draft a guy following his senior year and lose the one year of development than have to pay up huge $ because they have the leverage of being able to simply return for their senior year if they're not satisfied with your offer.

I'd rather not spend money this summer (not that much talent out there anyway) and just let the guys develop.

I'd rather watch the Jets game with those guys.

We all hbe our yes we tired by 11 years of mediocre but calling for the managers head at this time is absurd and irrational more pike decision out of anger.even if a new manager comes now it will be worse and target will be top four lets stop whining am angry as well but if wenger goes now then this season is awaste the new manager wouldn't pull a miracle and just coz hes new guys think we will win the league or rather challenge.

The guy he's up against must be a big enough name, he has to be capable in many areas, I hope Nelson realizes this rather than expecting to be playing uncontested each week.