Constitutional cases on
habeas corpus challenges to bad laws and illegal restraint by the government
Not exact matches
The ruling marks the first time in U.S. history that an animal has been covered by a writ of
habeas corpus, which typically allows human prisoners to
challenge their detention.
The group contended that the chimps should be covered by a writ of
habeas corpus, which typically allows human prisoners to
challenge their detention.
► «New York Supreme Court Justice Barbara Jaffe ruled that two research chimps at Stony Brook University are not covered by a writ of
habeas corpus, which typically allows human prisoners to
challenge their detention,» David Grimm wrote on Thursday at ScienceInsider.
The decision means that the animals aren't covered by a writ of
habeas corpus, which typically allows human prisoners to
challenge their detention.
On April 13, five months before The Fugitive debuted, Boston lawyer F. Lee Bailey filed a writ of
habeas corpus in federal court
challenging the fairness of the extraordinary 1954 trial in which Sheppard was convicted.
Application for leave to file a petition for writs of
habeas corpus and prohibition in this Court
challenging the jurisdiction and legal authority of a military commission which convicted applicant of a violation of the law of war and sentenced him to be hanged.
664, denying an application for writs of
habeas corpus and prohibition likewise
challenging the jurisdiction and legal authority of the military commission which tried and convicted petitioner.
In addition, BDS has a highly successful in - house federal court practice, and has litigated dozens of
habeas corpus petitions
challenging the wrongful detention of immigrants, including the Second Circuit's landmark decision in Lora v. Shanahan.
Today the Court granted certiorari to Harrington v. Richter, an ineffective assistance of counsel case
challenging the issuance of
habeas corpus relief by the Ninth Circuit based upon counsel's reliance on cross-examination and other methods to create reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt rather than expert - opinion testimony.
We conclude with an extensive unit on federal
habeas corpus remedies, including both
challenges to federal executive detention (including the War on Terror cases) and collateral attack on state criminal convictions.