Daniel B. Rodriguez: And is that also true if and when the case goes to appeal, so if it goes up to the Federal Appellate Court, is the Federal Appellate Court too required under
habeas doctrine to defer to the judgments of the State Courts?
Not exact matches
Of course, in the Martinez case, the Supreme Court held that states» decisions to relegate IAC claims to collateral review had important implications for the scope of procedural default
doctrine in later federal
habeas proceedings.
The topics covered include justiciability, congressional authority to define and limit federal court jurisdiction, federal common law and implied rights of action, the application of state law in federal courts under the Erie
doctrine, civil rights actions and immunities of state officials and governments, and
habeas corpus.
Second, [the
doctrine] preserves orderly administration of state judicial business, preventing the interruption of state adjudication by federal
habeas proceedings.