Not exact matches
Rather, they were a much more primitive hominid population, possibly Homo
habilis, whose members
lived in, or at least transited, Dmanisi much earlier than what our accepted chronology of human evolution indicates.
Homo
habilis («handy man», «skillful person») is a species of the genus Homo, which
lived from approximately 2.5 million to 1.8 million years ago at the beginning of the Pleistocene.
Analysis of Neo and the other remains reveals that H. naledi had features that are shared with some of the earliest known fossil members of our genus, such as Homo rudolfensis and Homo
habilis, species that
lived two million years ago.
Bromage points out that the first reconstruction of ER 1470 was erroneous by giving it a flat face, but - ``... recent studies of anatomical relationships show that in
life the face must have jutted out considerably, creating an ape - like aspect, rather like the faces of Australopithecus ``.72 This finding is one of a number which suggest that the species Homo
habilis never existed.
On the other hand fossil OH 62 proves that «
habilis ``, far from being Homo - like, was small and ape - like - these cases were the very opposite of what evolution theory predicted and expected.103 Even though the brain size of WT 15000 was smaller than most modern humans, it was still larger than quite a few people
living today.