Not exact matches
If you or your ex-spouse do not live or spend any time in the rented house then it isn't possible to claim the rented house as being a
habitual residence.
Determining the child's
habitual residence is a threshold issue in any Hague Abduction Convention case, and
if the court determines that the country from which the child was removed was not his or her place of
habitual residence, the Convention will not apply and the petition should be dismissed.
(ii) Whether or not there is a risk that the respondent would be subject to violence, etc. by the petitioner in such a manner as to cause psychological harm to the child,
if the respondent and the child entered into the state of
habitual residence;
If you have the baby at home the child's
habitual residence during that period of time it its home.
If your baby is born overseas, whether in Sweden or Saudi Arabia, the child's «habitual residence» for purposes of the Hague Convention will be Sweden or Saudi Arabia — and that can create terrible problems if you want to take your baby «back home.&raqu
If your baby is born overseas, whether in Sweden or Saudi Arabia, the child's «
habitual residence» for purposes of the Hague Convention will be Sweden or Saudi Arabia — and that can create terrible problems
if you want to take your baby «back home.&raqu
if you want to take your baby «back home.»
The presumption that a debtor's centre of main interests is the place of their
habitual residence is displaced
if that
residence has moved to another state within the six months before proceedings.
In a nutshell, a Hague Convention application may be made when a child is taken or retained across an international border, away from his or her
habitual residence, without the consent of a parent who has rights of custody under the law of the
habitual residence,
if the two countries are parties to the Convention.
The latter applies to persons who «
if returned to his or her country of origin, or in the case of a stateless person, to his or her country of former
habitual residence, would face a real risk of suffering serious harm» and who are «unable, or, owing to such risk, unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of that country» (Article 2 (e)-RRB-.
If the measure is one which has no equivalent in the law of the requested state — the Explanatory Report gives an example of a public law measure — then the requested state may adapt it to fit what it can achieve or may need to exercise its own substantive jurisdiction (assuming a change of
habitual residence).
For civil lawsuit,
if the civil lawsuit brought against a citizen shall be under the jurisdictionof the people's court located in the place where the defendant has hisdomicile,
if the defendant's domicile is different from his
habitual residence, the lawsuit shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's court located inthe place of his
habitual residence.
By virtue of S. 1 Wills Act 1967, «a will shall be treated as properly executed
if its execution conformed to the internal law in force in the territory where it was executed, or in the territory where, at the time of its execution or of the testator's death, he was domiciled or had his
habitual residence, or in a state of which, at either of those times, he was a national.»
If the child's
habitual residence in another country was established because the petitioner fled the United States to avoid criminal penalties, the petitioner may be disentitled to access to U.S. courts.
Courts must take such applications extremely seriously, especially
if a child is likely to be taken to a country that is not a party to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, or that does not return children promptly to their
habitual residence.
An order that the petitioner have no contact with the respondent
if the respondent returns to the country of the child's
habitual residence.
Courts taking this approach will decide that a child has acquired a new
habitual residence only
if it is established that the parents had a shared and settled purpose to do so.
Article 12 of the Hague Convention mandates the return of children who have been wrongfully taken or retained away from their
habitual residence without the consent of a person with rights of custody,
if less than one year has elapsed from the wrongful taking or retention to the commencement date of the return proceedings.
(c)
if the spouses did not have a common
habitual residence, the internal law of the jurisdiction in which the spouse making an application for an order under this Part was most recently habitually resident.
(5) Subject to subsection (3),
if the spouses» first common
habitual residence during the relationship between the spouses was in a jurisdiction in which a regime of community of property applies, property owned or acquired and debt owing or acquired during the relationship between the spouses that is property or debt to which the regime of community of property applies must be divided at the end of the relationship between the spouses according to that regime of community of property.
Paragraph 1 shall not apply
if the holder of access rights referred to in paragraph 1 has accepted the jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State of the child's new
habitual residence by participating in proceedings before those courts without contesting their jurisdiction.
if it is irreconcilable with a later judgment relating to parental responsibility given in another Member State or in the non-Member State of the
habitual residence of the child provided that the later judgment fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition in the Member State in which recognition is sought.
Where the child has his or her
habitual residence in the territory of a third State which is not a contracting party to the Hague Convention of 19 October 1996 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition, enforcement and cooperation in respect of parental responsibility and measures for the protection of children, jurisdiction under this Article shall be deemed to be in the child's interest, in particular
if it is found impossible to hold proceedings in the third State in question.
as concerns the recognition and enforcement of a judgment given in a court of a Member State on the territory of another Member State, even
if the child concerned has his or her
habitual residence on the territory of a third State which is a contracting Party to the said Convention.
therefore, according to this
if an access parent removes a child from his or her country of
habitual residence (and effectively eliminates the other parent's right to custody) then an order may be made for his or her immediate return
if the country to which the child has been taken to has also ratified the Convention.
If the answer is yes, and no exception contemplated by the Convention is applicable, the child must be returned to the place of his or her
habitual residence.
A reference in sub-paragraph (d) of the preceding paragraph to the debtor's place of business shall,
if it has more than one place of business, mean its principal place of business or,
if it has no place of business, its
habitual residence.
In Hague Convention 1980 child abduction retention cases, a new
habitual residence regardless of intention of the parents may have been brought about in state B for example
if the child is in school and settled in its new social environment.
Many
if not all private law treaties these days refer to «
habitual residence» instead, to shake off some of the technicalities of domicile and look for something more capable of being shown as a matter of fact.)
If the information is not confirmed and the designated authority has no information about the respondent's
habitual residence, return the support application to the appropriate authority in the originating reciprocating jurisdiction.
if the party is not entitled to support under the law of the jurisdiction in which he or she is habitually resident, the law of the jurisdiction in which the parties last maintained a common
habitual residence.
If the information is not confirmed and the designated authority has no information about the respondent's
habitual residence, return the support variation application to the appropriate authority in the originating reciprocating jurisdiction.
If the child's
habitual residence can not be established, then the member state in which the child is present has jurisdiction.
So
if you apply for a social welfare payment only you, the applicant, have to satisfy the
habitual residence condition.
If a child's
habitual residence changes as a result of a wrongful removal or retention, jurisdiction may shift only under very strict conditions.
This could arise, for example,
if the child's
habitual residence has changed.
This is sometimes called «
habitual residence» and can apply even
if you're living abroad at the time of the adoption.
If no order exists before a parent moves a child overseas and gets an order in another country, the order usually will be recognized in the United States — unless the United States has been the
habitual residence of the child and the other parent claims the child was wrongfully taken.
4
If the child's
habitual residence changes, the attribution of parental responsibility by operation of law to a person who does not already have such responsibility is governed by the law of the State of the new
habitual residence.