Not exact matches
There is no
rule that one parent can not unilaterally change the
habitual residence of a child; and
Thus, the Hong Kong courts have revised their
rules concerning the interpretation of
habitual residence to follow the interpretation of the entire European Union, the UK, Canada and most of the rest of the
(1) Regarding the formation and effect of a contract (excluding labor contracts; hereinafter referred to in this Article as «consumer contract») between a consumer (i.e., an individual, excluding those cases where the party acts as a business or for a business) and a business operator (i.e., a juridical person or other corporate association, or an individual in those cases where the party is acting as a business or for a business), even where by choice under Article 7 or variation under Article 9, the applicable law would be a law other than that of the consumer's
habitual residence, when the consumer indicates to the business operator his or her intention that a particular mandatory
rule from within the law of the consumer's
habitual residence should apply, this mandatory
rule shall also apply to the matters covered by the
rule concerning the consumer contract's formation and effect.
(3) In regards to the formation of a consumer contract, even where a law other than the law of a consumer's
habitual residence is chosen under Article 7, when the consumer indicates to the business operator his or her intention that a particular mandatory
rule from within the law of the consumer's
habitual residence should apply to the formalities of the consumer contract, only the mandatory
rule shall apply to the matters covered by the
rule concerning the consumer contract's formalities, irrespective of Article 10, paragraphs 1, 2, and 4.
Thompson may therefore offer some valuable insights on how the SCC could
rule on the issue of the effect of a time - limited consent on a child's
habitual residence in Balev.
In deciding whether it would be unduly harsh to expect an asylum seeker to relocate to a safe haven in another part of his country, consideration of conditions in the place of
habitual residence does not have to be the starting point of the assessment, the House of Lords has
ruled.
The closest link to determine which national family law
rules are applicable to specific family matters is the
habitual residence or domicile of the parties concerned.