Sentences with phrase «had a creator then»

If God had a creator then God wouldn't truly be God and God's creator would then be God.

Not exact matches

He didn't know then that he would become a businessman and job - creator, but, he says, «I knew in my heart that if I was ever in a position where I could make a difference, I wouldn't leave people behind.»

Kouzina creator Nick Amaral said when he first researched similar apps he found «one or two» in Canada that ended up folding, but he feels the times have changed since then.

And if you really think your have a «supernatural ability» to speak with the creator of the universe, then your probably crazy.

So if you believe there is a creator, then you have to think with all these people claiming there God is the true God which one is right?

And Warner Brothers, smelling opportunity, told show creator Rob Thomas that if Kickstarter could get $ 2 million then they would take care of the rest.

What kind of azzhole of created being would be so ungrateful to the one who created him, to rebel and denounce his creator, and then call Him evil when He demands justice?

To talk about odds of it happening and not happening are irrelevant, sorry if you think the odds are so astronomical that its impossible, keep in mind that you feel better with infinite regression, the most illogical fallacy there is (that god created this universe and then god had to have a creator, because lets get real, you're supposed to have me believe that a creator so complex that he can create the universe just appeared?

In fact... I would be greatly disturbed by the idea of the creator of the universe making sexual desire and attraction such a core part of our being, and then not being subject to those feelings Himself.

@Slick, «Since you atheist believe there is no creator, then it would be easy for man to solve it's own problems.»

We have the lowly at the bottom who have little except for their «faith», then you have the guys with a special link to their «deity», who preach to the lowly about all their «sins»... I wonder what's in it for the creator?

Well, if you don't have a direct uninteruppted pipeline to the Creator yourself, regular audiences and such to discuss things, then it is kind of pointless to say this is or isn't God's will.

Christians do not then force others to believe anything, but rather go to their homes as Jesus commanded his genuine disciples to do, seeking to discuss, reason and hopefully teach them about our Creator, Jehovah God and his kingdom, for Jesus said just before he ascended to heaven: «Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations... teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded you.»

You'd need to prove the existence of a creator in that case then.

Furthermore, if such an agent was also the creator of the appliances, then it would also be responsible for the defect that caused the fire.

So I was not making any speculations, I was pointing out that if what you say is true, then anyone and everyone would be coming to the same conclusion about the same creator, instead you get 41,000 different flavors of one brand along with tens of thousand of other brands.

If it is true that the creator constantly supports, preserves, and renews His world, if everything new that appears in the world has come and continuously comes from His plan for creation and from His creative power, then in some way it has to come into contact with the reality that forms the object of the sciences.»

Should they once admit it to be true that this earth has been visited by the Creator, then the standards and values of the man who was also God will inevitably challenge and judge their lives.

If this Reality is the Creator to whom we trace our existence but who does not trace its existence to us, then it has an integrity of its own, an integrity whose ways are not our ways, and whose ends can not be conflated with ours.

Thus, if the universe is born, then it must have come from a Creator who gave it being.

But if it grows, then it must have been born, and if born, then there must have been a Creator - Ground that gave it birth.

If god * had * to sacrifice his son to appease himself, according to some «angry gods» paradigm, then he was not in control of the paradigm, and could not have been it's creator.

Don't get me wrong — If the bible is incorrect, and there actually is a loving god / creator out there somewhere, and he has prepared a wonderful eternal place for us humans to spend «eternity», then I am all for it.

If a new meaning of nature has pervaded modern history, an autonomous world existing in - itself, then so likewise man himself no longer appears as the image of a transcendent Creator.

In order to let the world come into existence, and then to continue to be itself and not just an emanation of God's own being, an omnipotent Creator would somehow have to restrain or «rein in» the divine presence and power.

But if one is attempting instead to get at Paul's own orientation, then it would seem that for Paul the most basic sin of man is that he confuses God with the world, the Creator with the creation:

Hint; if god «exists» then time always existed, and it could not have been it's creator.

That «beginning» then could NOT have a creator, or you have entered into a infinite causal chain, which doesn't exist.

If the universe had a beginning then the only «logical» conclusion would be that it had a designer or creator (if you will).

«As far as anyone can show, ALL gods are imaginary» -------------- If a creator God did not exist, then nothing would exist.

Almost every believer I have ever talked to wants to use the logic of complex creations requiring a creator but fail to grasp the simple and unavoidable flaw in that logic which is that the super complex entlty it would take to design and build the universe would then by its own complexity require a more complex entlty to have created it and so on.

Second, if we then have to rush to a creator God, what «caused» God.

But if Christians allow death to rule in the realm of physicality, then ultimately the doctrine of creation is in jeopardy — the doctrine that God remains the good creator who loves the world that God has made and who is not going to abandon it.

Also, for anyone out there who wants to give that garbage about «universe is so complicated, it must have been created by someone», then I ask this: If your god can snap its fingers and create the universe, do nt you think that they must be the most complicated being that we would know of, and so must definitely have had a creator?

If God is the creator of all things then he also created «scientific evidence» and would not be adequate to explain or even show God.

Not what u see on CNN, not what your mum said nor your pastor or priest said and not what u see some Muslims neighbors of yours do... noooo nay,,, what have u searched your self... i dare u do... find the true, i swear nothing makes any sense as Islam does, those guys know the whole truth... even if it will hurt, just like Santa - clause when u 12 year or the rats that gives money to the de toothing kid in our Ugandan myth, u deserve to know the truth... and if no scientist has come out and disproved the divine origin of this universe logically then there must be a mighty some one behind it and that Creator or whatever it is, HE has a way, a straight path to Him and we are obliged to know it... so my adverse to u is look hard for the true coz it is clear from false, even if u may hate it!!

It doesn't make any sense that if my soul is in danger, all you have to do is whisper something about it, and the creator of the universe reads your mind, and only then says, «Okay, okay, I'll let him off this time, with a warning.»

Besides, once you open up the possibility of a creator god then you have to determine which creator god is most likely.

If God is creator, then God reigns over the death of every sensate being that ever moved on earth — to say nothing of his special responsibility for the bloody sins of those beings he has made in his image.

If we do not believe there is a deep correspondence between what the Creator wanted for men and women and [what the Creator wanted] for the family, then, of course, we have a problem.»

If God is what has been disclosed in the event to which we look with gratitude and joy, then we are glad to entrust ourselves to our creator, deliverer, and sanctifier.

Of course, if we believe that God is creator / maintainer of the universe then we can have faith that God somehow preserves our lives after death.

except there is no «creator god» as that would require a being,... first to «exist», (requires time), and then also «act» (also requires time), * before * she created spacetime.

And if there is a creator, then the creator must have a story.

Here we have known methods of life on this planet that we have studied and observed to come to an evolutionary conclusion for part of the origins of life (the manual transmission) and then you have your theory of a prime mover, a universal creator (the flux capacitor if you will), which can not be tested, can not be seen, can not be heard, can not be felt by any known testing methods and yet you want to say «Hey, why havn't you learned to drive the flux capacitor transmission yet?

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

This is also entirely consistent with Rand's ideas that the «job creators» could do no wrong and should be unfettered by any regulations whatsoever (which naively ignores the disastrous consequences of when we had no regulation whatosever during the Industrial Regulation, but then again pure ideology need not be hindered by real - life consequences).

If you build a house, then you have every right to destroy it because you were the creator.

lunchbreaker When we go with position 2 «In the beginning God created» and stand in awe at the wonder of it all as Einstein did then my only assumption, based upon that creators character, is that I wouldn't want to miss it for the world!

If we are lucky enough to be chosen, then we have the good fortune of having the resurrected dead man as an advocate, a heavenly lawyer that continually pleads our case to the creator so that he doesn't act on his overwhelming urge to kill us on the spot for being exactly how he made us.