Sentences with phrase «had a reader leave»

Newspapers barely have any readers left, so perhaps bitter and cynical columnists are speaking to empty rooms?

-LSB-...] had a reader leave a comment in a recent post about the 1987 crash.

It's even more important to have readers leave online reviews at e-tailers and sites such as GoodReads.

If you write one long post, you risk having your readers leave your page.

Afterwards, as students were getting ready to leave, «Ellie» was visibly upset to have her reader leave.

If I have any readers left, I have been busy with a handful of things and the blog has been left out.

Not exact matches

Within hours of the announcement on Thursday — which involves making it easier for users to flag fakes, as well as alerting readers when the accuracy of a story has been called into question — conservative outlets were already dismissing the move as a conspiracy of left - leaning partisans, designed to smother alternative sources and protect existing «gatekeepers.»

I've done this for fundamentally the same reason that Spayd does in her column — because an engaged, two - way relationship with readers is one of the few powerful tools that media entities have left.

And as a few of your readers pointed out, odds are there will still be something left from my investable assets as well, as they would only be exhausted, under the 3 % rule, if my future is as bad as the worst 50 - year period in history.

Hello fellow readers (if any of you are still left), it has been about half a year since I have posted and despite the lack content and blog growth I can assure you all my dividend income is still growing month over month.

Additionally, I love hearing how the site has helped people and am always looking for ways to make it more useful for my readers, so please leave me some feedback from time to time.

In all the above calculations, the astute reader might have noticed that I left out two parts from the above calculation:

If you bother to read some of the more popular atheist blogs, you will quickly see that they and many of their readers have some of their own unwritten rules, the majority of which have NOTHING to do with atheism / secularism and everything to do with promoting extremist left - wing agendas.

Goldberg is a political journalist, not a historian, and readers more familiar with the ideological twists and turns of the modern era will be familiar with his thesis: While the left has long depicted the right as fascist, it is in fact the left — from Hegel to Hitler to Hillary and, yes, the politics of meaning, too — that follows the fascist formula most influentially articulated by Mussolini: «Everything within the state; nothing outside the state; nothing against the state.»

SSPX Readers may know that the Society of St Pius X, the group that sort of left the Catholic Church after the Second Vatican Council (the theology of communion and schism is a subtle one), has ejected one of its four bishops.

In my defence, another reader rejoined that the real problem was «trying to explain to someone who has not yet got it how and why some of the things that Pope Francis has said, done or left unsaid and undone have disturbed and brought disquiet in the minds and hearts of loyal, practising Catholics.»

While concordism leaves the reader scratching her head as she attempts to figure out how there could have been waters above the sky (Genesis 1:7), Walton's approach «maintains that this terminology is simply describing cosmic geography in Israelite terms to make a totally different point.»

By leaving out this important information and by failing to seriously explore those biblical passages that, at least at first glance, don't seem to support his thesis, Bell has left his readers ill - equipped to deal with challenges from those who don't agree with these ideas.

Although he never justifies this move, it is obvious from the start that Powell simply dismisses any German Catholic approaches to the Trinity, leaving the reader wondering how his work might have been improved by including the recent contributions of, say, Schmaus, Rahner, von Balthasar, or Greshake.

Sci - Fi Author John C. Wright takes down a belligerent reviewer in style: The thrilling conclusion: An interviewer once asked me if my Christianity or my political philosophy would offend readers, by which he meant readers to the Left of Center.

And, given that the Furioso is the completion of the Innamorato (left unfinished at Boiardo's death), readers who have not mastered the dialects of Renaissance Italy can now enjoy the whole narrative arc of these two linked epics without resorting to abridgments.

(The reader is often left uncertain as to whether Bacevich is speaking in his own voice or is simply passing along the views of others, but I take it as significant that he has been an early contributor to Buchanan's new journal, the American Conservative.)

You have fallen down the proverbial rabbit hole of left vs right and this reader... chooses to not read nor watch you anymore.

In the early part of the book especially, Charlton has a tendency to wander off on what appear to be tangentialdiscussions that serve to illustrate his impressively wide range of reading but left this reader without a sense of clear structure and form.

Thus, the book has a number of central propositions scattered throughout that the reader may be left trying to cobweb together.

But the only thing that each of us can and should do is what we each must do ultimately alone, if we have vocations to be writers: Go off and write out of the very fullness of human experience about the very fullness of human experience and hope to find and affect contemporary readers and the greater world, and in the meantime leave the distracting and finally pointless diagnoses of who were the Catholic writers, and how much, and how well, how little, how importantly, to the critics and scholars.

Some readers may wonder why the scientists won't admit that there are mysteries beyond our comprehension, and that one of them may be how those complex animal groups could have evolved directly from preexisting bacteria and algae without leaving any evidence of the transition.

It is memorable, gives some story «hooks» to hang the ideas on, and often keep the reader interested and moving forward when the normal method of teaching / writing would have left them bored.

One blog reader, Jake Yaniak, left a comment that he had written something similar just a week or so earlier.

She has also written a companion guide, One Thousand Gifts Devotional (Zondervan), which provides 60 devotionals and leaves space for the reader to journal.

Sadly, it is unfinished, and leaves the reader wondering how the story would have continued.

If you have read any of the Stephen King novels then you can not deny that there are religious overtones, the meaning of those overtones can be left up to the reader, which I believe is the way that King intended it.

But, interestingly, Ford has never provided any direct or external evidence for the compositional habits he attributes to Whitehead, though his bold assertions on the matter leave most readers with the impression that such evidence exists and would be forthcoming if only someone requested it.

Readers may have noticed that we have not balanced myths «on the left» with an equal number of myths «on the right.»

The genius of stories is that the hearers and readers can not remain outside the text but have to play the game the story sets up, entering the gaps the storyteller strategically leaves for just that purpose.

In editing these essays, I have tried to cut down repetitions to the minimum, but since some of them are integral to some of the essays I have left them there but have put footnotes to indicate cross references to show I am aware of these repetitions and to reduce the irritation they cause to the reader.

If Mr. Easterly had let his imagination range beyond governments and government policies, he might have left his readers with a hope and sense of responsibility that goes beyond writing a letter to Congress demanding that, in exchange for the next ten billion dollars, programs of massive ineffectiveness be made effective.

Schumacher had to leave to catch a plane before I could ask him whether that's what he expected to happen to many of his devoted readers.

I'll leave it to readers to decide if they think he has overcome his addiction.

This recreation of a Catholic imagination has many aspects which I will have to leave readers to work out for themselves, but I want to allude particularly to its relevance to issues of life and sexual morality.

Now the editors of Commonweal have answered that the comments were, in fact, awful calumny, but that they were left by blog readers, not contributors, and nobody over at Commonweal agrees with them, much less hates First Things.

While Frykholm has no sympathy with the Left Behind series theologically, politically or literally, she has a great deal of sympathy with its readers and she explores why people with interesting lives are drawn to such schlock in their religious reading.

On the other hand, Bible readers regularly find much that leaves them surprised, shocked, or wondering about how some of these stories (the rape of Dinah and Tamar's seduction of Judah) have anything to say about God's ways in this world.

Curley, Spalding insists, had «little use for the values of mainstream America» (what those values are is left to the reader's imagination), and deliberately eschewed the Carroll / Gibbons tradition for a church guided by «the myth of majestic changelessness.»

In this sort of a venue if readers donated from time to time, it wouldn't be like a church where you have to please the people, in fact, if David changed his stance on things, a lot of us would leave.

If you have any questions left you can email me @ [email protected] (also applies to the interested readers of the comment section).

My guess is that the reader who left that comment on the buckwheat porridge probably hadn't blended it enough.

Since there is so much division and strife over what the word means, Bible translators have traditionally chosen to leave the word untranslated, and just change the Greek letters of the word into English, and leave it to the reader to figure out what the word means.

In the majority of the novel, while more difficult topics (i.e. rape) clearly took place, scenes ended at a point where the reader had no doubt what would happen but was not left with detailed descriptions.

I am more of a regular reader than regular commenter — I don't even have my own food blog — but I felt compelled to leave a message to let you know that I thoroughly enjoyed the recent vegan - friendly developings around here!