Sentences with phrase «hand if the question»

Things are out of hand if the question is even being asked.

Not exact matches

How to Manage Interns: Providing Mentorship and Advice Even if you have a hands off management style, when you bring on interns, you have to make sure that they have at least one point person, if not more, that they can go to with their questions.
If you're interested in determining a candidate's thirst to keep learning, instead turn your attention toward questions that will apply to the job at hand.
In almost every class of entrepreneurs I teach, I ask the question, and a staggering number of hands goes up each time (and that's after I tell people to leave their hands down if they want to keep their childhood private).
«If I asked that question in Japan, no one would raise their hands,» Niinami said, indicating the phrase is unfamiliar in Suntory's home market.
If you can answer «yes» to the checklist questions above, you may have the next big winner on your hands.
If you still have any questions, our team at Olsson Capital is on hand 24/7 to help with anything you need.
If you question the free market system, and how greed is good due to the invisible hand — well there is scripture about how you can not have two masters.
I hope this applies to your question, many times, sitting in services in a particular church, the Pastor would give a reprimand to the congregation, saying: «If you feel the urge to raise your hands and do not do it, then you are resisting the Holy Spirit.»
Here at the outset let us take care to make it clear that the question of an historical point of departure arises even for a contemporary disciple; for if we are not careful here, we shall meet with an insuperable difficulty later (in Chapter V), when we come to deal with the case of the disciple whom we call the disciple at second hand.
Before my search as I was praying and pondering the question at hand, I thought of Genesis 2 and of how God brought all the animals to Adam to see if he could find a suitable helpmate before creating Eve.
If you have any questions for Bo and Tripp, they'll be on - hand today to address some of them!
If, on the other hand, it was written hundreds of years after the time of Christ, then I would question the veracity of this fragment.
The guy talked and drew for about five minutes, and then as he closed up, we were supposed to pull a Gospel tract out of our pocket and hand it to a stranger nearby and ask what they thought about Jesus and the message they had just heard, and if they had any questions or wanted us to pray with them.
As a Christian Scientist said recently in response to a medical student's question as to how she would help starving children in Africa: «I suspect if I were there I would do what you would do — cradle as many as I could and feed them with all the food I could lay my hands on.
If on the other hand you ask about «last resort» or «innocent immunity,» others will grant your fight to put the question.
Dalahäst If people actually questioned evolution it would be one thing, but almost everyone on here who criticizes it simply dismisses all the evidence supporting it out of hand, which is probably why you see that reaction.
In the world of reality, on the other hand, where it is a question of the individual man, there is this little tiny transition from having understood to doing; it is not always cito citissime [as quickly as possible], not geschwind wie der Wind [fast as the wind], if I may speak German for lack of philosophic terms.
The gospel may again speak to us, and make of us ambassadors for Christ, if we appear before that One with empty hands, with the questions of those whom we represent (which are also our questions) and wait for answers... or rather, for the Answerer.
If it is the case that civilizations are, in their roots, dependent on the quality of religion, and if it is the case that America, by the cunning hand of Providence, has been thrust into the leadership of a global civilization, then we should attend to the question of whether the religion that guides us is genuinely universaIf it is the case that civilizations are, in their roots, dependent on the quality of religion, and if it is the case that America, by the cunning hand of Providence, has been thrust into the leadership of a global civilization, then we should attend to the question of whether the religion that guides us is genuinely universaif it is the case that America, by the cunning hand of Providence, has been thrust into the leadership of a global civilization, then we should attend to the question of whether the religion that guides us is genuinely universal.
If, on the other hand, we regard Paul's answer to the question, «What is man?»
But, on the other hand, if angels do not take up space, then the question is this: «Are angels then also omnipresent?»
On the other hand, if one can bracket the cosmogonical question, the reference beyond the God - world system, and focus upon the journey within the system toward «the maximum attainment of intensity compatible with harmony that is possible under the circumstances of the actual situation» (PS 18:116), then perhaps one will find that the biblical images and the process - relational concepts are richly mutually illuminating after all.
But my point here is that unsatisfactory economic ideas and practices which have an impressive history of failure, which caused to founder that great nation California, which lie at the root of much of the shame and dread and division and hostility and cynicism with which our society is presently afflicted, are treated as immutable truths, not to be questioned, not to be interfered with, lest they unleash their terrible retribution, recoiling against whomever would lay a hand on the Ark of Market Economics, if that is the name under which this mighty power is currently invoked.
If you object that this virtually throws the initiative and the decision of questions into the hands of the clergy this is but an internal peculiarity of the Catholic religion.
His question was, «What is the connection, if any, between classical rhetorical theory and practice on the one hand, and contemporary contextualization theory and practice on the other?»
What the Old Testament especially teaches us is this: «that zeal is as essentially a duty of all God's rational creatures, as [are] prayer and praise, faith and submission; and, surely, if so, [then] especially of sinners whom He has redeemed: that zeal consists in a strict attention to His commands» a scrupulousness, vigilance, heartiness, and punctuality, which bears with no reasoning or questioning about them» an intense thirst for the advancement of His glory» a shrinking from the pollution of sin and sinners» an indignation, nay impatience, at witnessing His honor insulted» a quickness of feeling when His name is mentioned, and a jealousy how it is mentioned» a fullness of purpose, an heroic determination to yield Him service at whatever sacrifice of personal feeling» and an energetic resolve to push through all difficulties, were they as mountains, when His eye or hand but gives the sign» a carelessness of obloquy, or reproach, or persecution, a forgetfulness of friend and relative, nay, a hatred (so to say) of all that is naturally dear to us, when He says, «Follow me.»
Their argument is that, to put it in Lincoln's language, «if the policy of the government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions, the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their government into the hands of that eminent tribunal.»
At the same time, the candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions, the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their government into the hands of that eminent tribunal.
Without question, if all four of those men had caught me, and all four had already had their hands on some crack that night (which they almost definitely had), they would have killed me.
But, question, what if others were always down on you, always telling you were wrong, you were going to hell, etc. for loving your girlfriend or your wife or shunned you for holding the other's hand in public.
When this man handed you a pamphlet you took it no matter what the subject: the dangers of atomic power plants, the role played by the International Jewish Cartel in the overthrow of friendly governments, the CIA - Contra - cocaine connection, the farm workers» unions, the Jehovah's Witnesses (If You Can Answer These Ten Questions «Yes,» You Have Been SAVED!)
But this question he can not answer in definite terms, if he is to answer it sincerely, for the reason that the answer is all too readily at hand: that he wills the Good and detests vice — when vice seems to be loathsome; that he wills the approbation of good people — when they are in the majority and possess the power; that he will benefit the good cause — when it is so good as to confer some advantage upon him.
On the other hand, if we virtuously claim that we are not making any emendations but are simply following what is written, the question of what is written will arise.
I have only one question: if I were to do this without a cake mix (since I never have those on hand), what are the parts that I would add to my regular yellow cake batter to achieve the yummy result?
Quick question: I can not find irish moss here in Paris — I know it's a wonder food, but if I DO N'T have it on hand, is there anything I can use instead and will these recipes work without it or is it not even worth trying?
Her eyes looked slightly overwhelmed, so I handed her my food blogger business card and offered, «Why don't you email me if you have any questions?
I grabbed my Andrew James 3 in 1 hand blender to make this part of the recipe and within a minute (if that) I had a creamy caramel sauce that will make you question your previous caramel sauce choices.
If you're curious to know how you can integrate more healthy meals into your day, select Loblaws stores now have dieticians on hand who can answer any nutrition - related questions you might have.
A bit late on the reply, but if other have the question, I have a hand mixer but decided to use my stand mixer and it blended everything perfectly.
Question: I already have date past on hand (I try to always have a jar in my fridge:)-RRB-, so what amount would you recommend if the date paste is already prepared?
Whenever I have a hankering for cookies, there is a question that plagues me... And that question is; should I bake classic chocolate chip or double chocolate chip cookies??? Raise your hand if you too have ever been plagued by this decision?
A part of the catering idea is that the refugee cooks will be on hand when their food is served and will be able to talk with people if they have questions, making the food a means of cultural exchange.
Those games in hand are only useful if we win them and in our current form and looking at the fixture list it does not look good, so my question is whether this might actually be better for Arsenal in the long run.
My fellow gunners Wenger is a failure either you admit or not, though this is a preseason match which is less important just to make the players gain fitness, before the competitive matches commence, but at the same time Wenger's tactics and formation should be questioned especially against big teams, he had conceded numerous goals against big teams in which today's match is a reflection of what we are talking about, his old and out dated philosophy is no longer valid in modern football, no wonder Alexis Sanchez can't confide in his plans to propel the team in winning major honours, Wenger still believe in some of the bunch of fringe players he should have gotten rid of in the team and replace them with world class players or players that are hungry for success like Alexis, anyway there is still much time in the transfer window presently to do that, if he can change the hands of time and stop being too stubborn.
If he's the kid sitting in the front constantly raising his hand to ask questions just to show everyone how smart he is — that doesn't go over well in middle school, let alone the NFL.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
The reason this was a question is Darnold had 20 fumbles during two seasons with the USC Trojans, prompting some to wonder if his hands were small enough to be a problem for him.
When questioned about if Wenger is still the right man to lead Arsenal towards getting their hands on the trophy, Ljungberg said: «He's shown he's a great manager and I think he's been restricted a bit on the financial side in the past.
If Wenger fails to hand the England international his place back in the starting XI, then the questions are surely going to keep on coming well into the 2016/17 campaign.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z