Sentences with phrase «hand it to paul»

Ben Golliver: I've got to hand it to Paul George.

Not exact matches

The 20 - million - square - foot facility will be located in the district of House Speaker Paul Ryan, who was on hand to announce the deal at the White House today, alongside Walker, Vice President Mike Pence, President Donald Trump and Foxconn Chairman Terry Gou.
On the one hand, social platforms fuel their businesses: Paul is CEO of RebelMouse, a social content distribution platform, and Milena is CEO of PowertoFly, an online community that connects women to tech jobs.
«I think the CSA will start with a soft - glove approach and evolve to more iron - hand in a few years,» says Paul Gryglewicz, managing partner of Global Governance Advisors, a Toronto firm that advises company boards and senior managers on corporate government and executive pay issues.
Read: Ambrose Evans - Pritchard, Why Paul Krugman is Wrong, 15 December 2014 When the channel from second - hand trade in finance at Wall Street to first - hand trade in operational production at Main Street is jammed, pumping into the former will not have much effect on the latter.
UPDATE: On the other hand, I go over to RICOCHET to get a heaping helping of their hope, beginning with the Paul Rahe landslide for Mitt hypothesis.
So, apparently the day of vindication of Paul Cantor, Brian Anderson, and our Peter Lawler, not to mention my Carl's Rock Songbook is at hand, right?
-- a man would see a brilliant light during his lifetime that no one else saw — a man would hear a voice of another man no one else saw — all the other men would hear the same voice — all the other men would not see the brilliant light — Saul would be renamed to Paul and go through with it — Paul would arrive at a place where another man shows up at a specific time — the other man placing his hand on him and telling him he will be healed — Paul can now see, previously blind since the brilliant light event
Even though history clearly speaks to Paul dying at the hands of Nero, all the apostles except John being murdered, and early church fathers such as Polycarp being killed by Rome?
Paul was simply encouraging everyone in their faith, and as a matter of fact he was soon to have his head chopped off at the hands of Caesar, so what good did it do hiim if he was trying to control people with his letters?
Why is it that if one googles the phrase «Christian poetry» one has to wade through pages of results with titles like «Grandma's Praying Hands» and «Childhood Smiles» before getting to Dante, George Herbert, and Paul Mariani?
Yet throughout church history, this is what most churches have seemed to believe Paul was condoning when he wrote about handing someone over to Satan.
In support of this view, when Paul speaks of handing two believers over to Satan in 1 Timothy 1:20, they did not die but were still alive and well, and still causing problems for Paul and the church in Ephesus (cf. 2 Tim 2:17; 4:14).
But the New York Times writer failed to grasp that the article in Italian was commenting on off - hand remarks by Pope Francis at an audience in November, suggesting that perhaps he agrees with Paul VI, who once said to a young boy that his dog would be with him in heaven.
And again, Paul emphatically states that handing someone over to Satan in such a way is not for those outside the church, but only for those inside (1 Cor 5:9 - 13).
In 1 Corinthians 5:5 and 1 Timothy 1:20, Paul says he hands people over to Satan for the destruction of their flesh.
To obey Paul's command for your children means giving them more than a rational faith — it means also giving them a well - formed Christian imagination that can look at a starry night sky and see more than the infinite reach of empty space and the eternal stretch of endless time, that can «keep seeking the things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God» (3:1).
Those put the matter correctly who hold that the punishment of hell will consist in this that the godless will wish to escape the hand of God but will find it impossible to do so, as indeed Paul indicated (1 Thess.
Paul most likely would have simply invited you to his place or you tagged along and learned hands - on.
But in the readings for the First Sunday in Advent, Paul instructs the believers «to wake from sleep» because «the night is far gone, the day is at hand» (Rom.
John Paul stepped forward, took James» face in his hands, turned it to the left and spoke briefly into his ear.
I, on the other hand, presuppose that God can not be evil; that goodness and being belong inextricably together or else there is no ground for basic trust... Even Calvinist Paul Helm, a leading evangelical Calvinist thinker, agrees (as I show in my book) that «goodness» attributed to God can not be totally different from every understanding of goodness (and love) we know of.»
On the other hand, Paul told Titus about Elders, «He must hold firmly to the faithful message as it has been taught, so that he will be able to give exhortation in such healthy teaching and correct those who speak against it.»
So, your basing your claim on assumption that 1 Thessalonians where it talks about Paul stating about what happens to those of us who remain when Christ returns that one automatically concludes that Paul fully expected that event to happen in his lifetime, whereas 2 Thessalonians talks what has to happen before hand in order for Christ to return.
While monasticism in modern times has been deeply influenced by Dom Paul Delatte's rather rigorous interpretation of the Holy Rule (he was Abbot of Solesmes from 1890 to 1921) we find in Hugh Gilbert's firm but gentle hands a rather more humane understanding of the contemporary mind, particularly in his substantial treatment of the concept of obedience (a minefield for any Christian apologist) which stands at the centre of this present work.
Of course, the evidence of Paul, at first hand, and of many others which we know about primarily through Paul (his letter to the Corinthians is considerably older and closer to the events than the earliest of the written Gospels), is open to the objection that we have no guarantee that the appearances were not hallucinations.
Paul gives us first - hand testimony that Jesus appeared to him.
For example, in the last part of chapter 1, Paul told us that Christ was given new life, and raised from the dead, and seated at God's right hand in the heavenly places, so that everything, both now and in the ages to come might be placed under Christ's authority.
But with comic genius Paul Feig producing and the family of creator Charles Schulz onboard, there's reason to believe that Charlie Brown and company are in good hands.
On the other hand, all six occurrences of the word «justification» in the New Testament are in letters unanimously ascribed to Paul.
Twice Paul mentions handing others over to Satan.
On the other hand, Paul says that He prays to the Father.
Repeatedly Paul states that he works with his own hands as an example to follow.
Paul, on the other hand, represents a commitment to God's authority as revealed in the circumcision - free gospel.
at least rome took a thousand years to fall between fundamentalist intolerance and and the ease with which an american citizen can get his hands on weapons of medium destruction, the fall will be in your lifetime Paul -
Once more Paul was relating the trouble he had with speaking to his being perceived as a fool; yet on the other hand he «saw» more things than others, he had revelations and visions in abundance, and for him that was the ultimate sanity, a thing to boast about.
Paul is sometimes regarded as heavy - handed about conformity because he didn't want Christians to unnecessarily offend anyone with the wrong food or wrong headwear (1 Corinthians 8:9 - 13; 11:13 - 16).
Even if those little copper books that have been in the news lately turn out to have something inscribed by the hand of Paul or Peter or John that warns the church to have no buildings, I doubt most groups would leave their buildings.
For example, there are claims that certain people in the very early church suppressed certain writings, changed certain writings and even produced writings purporting to be from the hands of Paul or the Apostles.
As Paul is granted the right hand of fellowship, the Gentiles he represents are welcomed into the fellowship of believers as Gentiles, not converts to Judaism.
For example, one of the most important issues of the time was artificial contraception — which Pope Paul VI took out of the council's hands and reserved to himself, eventually issuing Humanae Vitae in 1968.
In The Descent into Hell (Lippincott, 1970) Altizer has attempted a systematic theological exploration of the radical and apocalyptic faith of Jesus and Paul, and has done so with the conviction that this has not yet been attempted by Christian theology and that a decisive key to this endeavor lies ready to hand in the world of Mahayana Buddhism.
Kirk, on the other hand, learned from Irving Babbitt and Paul Elmer More to regard imagination as the essential human quality.
«41 On the one hand, Paul's teaching on women in worship is understood to be culturally directed and no longer binding on Christians today; on the other hand, Paul's teaching on women's place in marriage is said to be timeless.
On the one hand, Paul argues for women's submission and subordination to men (1 Cor.
Saul was perhaps the leading persecutor of the Christians but at the gates of Damascus he was «struck down by a miracle, and converted to the faith he persecuted».1 Above all, Paul's conversion is a demonstration of God's triumphant power: «To show His power, He put forth His hand into the very midst of the persecutors of His Son, and seized upon the most strenuous among them.&raquto the faith he persecuted».1 Above all, Paul's conversion is a demonstration of God's triumphant power: «To show His power, He put forth His hand into the very midst of the persecutors of His Son, and seized upon the most strenuous among them.&raquTo show His power, He put forth His hand into the very midst of the persecutors of His Son, and seized upon the most strenuous among them.»
I saw the Church which John Paul II shepherded into this third millennium and handed over to his successor, Benedict, who is guiding it with a steady and loving hand.
And Saint John Paul points out that the procreation of children is closely linked to the task of handing on a way of life to one's children.6
Jesus has ascended in triumph to God's right hand; yet the subdued «authorities» of this age, St. Paul held, «persist» (Rom.
Acts13: 16,23 «Then paul stood up, and beckoning with his hand said,... (speaking of king David) of this man's seed hath God according to his promise raised unto Israel A Saviour, Jesus:» Interesting that you should pick paul, since he also did not believe that Jesus was the Son of God once and then was converted by Jesus himself!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z