Not exact matches
John 12:8 is the most common example: «You always have the poor with you...» Left out
of that (mis) interpretation is the fact that Jesus is actually quoting a passage from Jewish Scripture that makes the opposite point: The continual existence
of the poor serves
as the fundamental reason for
God's command to assist them, to give «liberally and ungrudgingly»: «Open your
hand to the poor and needy neighbor in your land.»
«
Hand of God,» the TV debut
of filmmaker Marc Forster («Monster's Ball»), will star Ron Perlman («Sons
of Anarchy»)
as a powerful judge who suffers a mental breakdown and goes on a vigilante quest to find the rapist who tore his family apart.
So it had better be good and not some second
hand or half baked notion
as he also famously wrote, «I want the presence
of God Himself, or I don't want anything at all to do with religion... I want all that
God has or I don't want any.»
«When you go out to war against your enemies and the LORD, your
God, delivers them into your
hand, so that you take captives, if you see a comely woman among the captives and become so enamored
of her that you wish to have her
as wife, you may take her home to your house.
Too often,
as well, believers will label something
as being «in
God's
hands now» when they are entirely capable
of doing something about it, but don't have the motivation to actually do it, see?
Christians, on the other
hand, believe that we will be in the presence
of God the Father and Jesus Christ solely by our faith in Christ and what He alone did by dying on the cross and rising again on the third day, so we believe it is a free gift
of God and it doesn't just come after all we can do
as Mormons believe.
And these followers make a large demographic
of political votes in a country that loves to start wars and elect politicians who will be «guided by the
hand of god»... excuse me
as I am affected by these people... their practices cab affect me
But we... with unveiled face, beholding
as in a mirror the glory
of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just
as by the Spirit
of the Lord... looking unto Jesus the author and finisher
of our faith who for the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right
hand of the throne
of God» 2Corinthians 3, Hebrews12)
And since we are not owners but merely caretakers
of this world and its people — its Wealth is neither ours to Keep OR to Give —
as the
hands and eyes
of God in the world we simply care for the Creation
of which we are a part.
In short,
God allowed Israel's destruction
as a judgement against their faithlessness; then almost 2000 years later, Man decides to recreate it in some misguided sense
of justice due to the suffering the Jews felt at the
hands of Nazis.
On one
hand God is a behemoth
of dirty done deeds against much
of humanism's dispositions while on the other
hand God shows little to practically no love to all our civilizations» ongoing trials
of which we steadily reshape
as the needs arise.
The best we can do is to remember the mystery that
God chooses to call * us * to be the
hands and feet
of Jesus Christ (a person whom Kerry neglects to mention in her heartfelt, but incomplete, accounting
of the role
of the Christian chaplain), and our job is to point the way to him; but this, and I think Kerry would agree, is best done through our loving actions and not,
as the professor or «Nancy» above might suggest, through our fancy words, theology, or persuasion.
Also, I couldn't quite get this into words
as I was writing before, so: I am believe that I am correct in my view
of Scripture
as it has been
handed down to me from teachers, preachers, writers and others; I believe that I am correct in my beliefs about who
God is, and about His self - revelation, in the same way that all people believe that the opinions they hold are true.
Certainly not much is said about defending the land from
God's enemies
as the Hebrews, for all their military might in killing women and children, always seem to get their asses
handed to them when a professional army
of men invades.
on the other
hand, atheists can not prove the concept
of god as wrong.
The mythical friend Gabriel was the mythical friend
of Jesus the Messaih accompanying him all time
as per the Quran readings... this mythical friend is the right
hand for
God and was sent to nearly all messengers
of God to deliver teachings from
God to his messengers and Gabriel is the only Angel that has minimum number
of wings reaching the sixth heaven
as a limit...
as per my readings and narrow knowledge... Reality you are playin with fire here show respect even if you are agnostic about all
as you are only human and do not know the unknown
of see the unseen or touch the untouched or feel the unfelt because even when you are alone you are not alone.
So while
as a Christian, I am not rejoicing over bin laden's death, I am assured that his death happened at the
hands of his judge, Almighty
God.
But the voice that tells Abraham not to lay his
hand on the young boy is a messenger
of YHVH, the four letters that Jewish tradition identifies with the embodiment
of God as the Transformer and Liberator from Egypt.
It's a simple story, but one that beautifully captures the heart
of the Easter story: a
God who enters our winter world
as a child and, on a tree, with nailscarred
hands and feet, brings the spring so that we too may join him in his own garden one day.
The moment the Christian churches begin Attuning themselves properly to Jesus Christ and Preaching His eternal message
of LOVE for Everyone, Without Conditions, and Teaching about the Afterlife
as God has promised us there is, and Teaching about the laying - on
of hands to heal the sick
as Jesus did, and begin truly Sharing their money with the poor
as Jesus did, THEN you will find people flocking back into the church.
But on the other
hand, people have «cherry picked» to state that
God hates one group over another and
as a young believer someone once pointed out that Psalm 14:1 can be taken out
of context to say «there is no
God.»
You mean
as part
of what it means to make sacrifices the greatest
of which being
God having to make the greatest sacrifice
of all that unlike Abraham who was at the last minute spared from having to make the sacrifice
of his beloved son Isaac,
God on the other
hand due to his love for all
of us imperfect beings had to actually sacrifice his beloved son.
Genesis, on the other
hand, portrays the One
God who has created all that which surrounding people worship
as the divinities
of nature.
As Jephthah charged into battle with his countrymen behind him, filled with «the Spirit of the Lord» (Judges 11:29), he made a promise to God: «If you give the Ammonites into my hands, whatever comes out of the door of my house to meet me when I return in triumph from the Ammonites will be the Lord's, and I will sacrifice it as a burnt offering» (v. 30
As Jephthah charged into battle with his countrymen behind him, filled with «the Spirit
of the Lord» (Judges 11:29), he made a promise to
God: «If you give the Ammonites into my
hands, whatever comes out
of the door
of my house to meet me when I return in triumph from the Ammonites will be the Lord's, and I will sacrifice it
as a burnt offering» (v. 30
as a burnt offering» (v. 30).
On the other
hand,
God is calling these communities, and each
of us
as members
of them, to participate in the salvation
of the world
God loves.
«Because the «Evil One» wants us to fail, there is a temptation to claim this territory
as our own and guard it — not
as a gift from
God but
as the work
of our own
hands».
Those put the matter correctly who hold that the punishment
of hell will consist in this that the godless will wish to escape the
hand of God but will find it impossible to do so,
as indeed Paul indicated (1 Thess.
It only has authority and only makes sense
as the written record
of God's Word
handed on through the Tradition
of God's People in the Church.
Acts 17:24 - 28 «24 The
God who made the world and all things in it, since He is Lord
of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with
hands; 25 nor is He served by human
hands,
as though He needed anything, since He Himself gives to all people life and breath and all things; 26 and He made from one man every nation
of mankind to live on all the face
of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries
of their habitation, 27 that they would seek
God, if perhaps they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one
of us; 28 for in Him we live and move and exist,
as even some
of your own poets have said, «For we also are His children.»»
Ann Lee, who founded the movement known
as Shakers, said
of her conversion, «I gave my heart to
God and my
hands to work.»
There can be no doubt that
God makes decisions a propos
of the disjunctive multiplicity
of eternal objects; the difficulty is to establish in precisely what sense these divine decisions are distinguishable from the choices and calculations made by the Leibnizian deity Whitehead's dilemma seems to be this: on the one
hand, the principle
of classification is to be challenged by positing the primordiality
of a world
of eternal objects that knows «no exclusions, expressive in logical terms»; on the other
hand, positing pure potentiality
as a «boundless and unstructured infinity» (IWM 252) lacking all logical order would seem to be precisely that conceptual move which renders it «inefficacious» or «irrelevant.»
In this framework, play does not fit easily within our present anguish, so Moltmann defines it
as that proleptic experience
of the future which is in
God's
hand, and our mission
of liberation on behalf
of that future.
I, on the other
hand, presuppose that
God can not be evil; that goodness and being belong inextricably together or else there is no ground for basic trust... Even Calvinist Paul Helm, a leading evangelical Calvinist thinker, agrees (
as I show in my book) that «goodness» attributed to
God can not be totally different from every understanding
of goodness (and love) we know
of.»
Glorious Lord Christ: the divine influence secretly diffused and active in the depths
of matter, and the dazzling centre where all the innumerable fibres
of the manifold meet; power
as implacable
as the world and
as warm
as life; you whose forehead is
of the whiteness
of snow, whose eyes are
of fire, and whose feet are brighter than molten gold; you whose
hands imprison the stars; you who are the first and the last, the living and the dead and the risen again; you who gather into your exuberant unity every beauty, every affinity, every energy, every mode
of existence; it is you to whom my being cried out with a desire
as vast
as the universe, «In truth you are my Lord and my
God.»
We all will have to taste death and then raise on that day for accountability and there will be family reunion in heavens and outside
of heavens where no one wish to be... what a great loss for the one who would be reunited outside
of the heavens like the people
of Noah who did not believe in him, people
of Lot did things that they were not supposed to do, pharaoh with his army and many more... on the other
hand Noah with the ones who believed in him, Abraham and his family who are submitted
as Abraham submitted to The One
God Almighty, Lot and his daughters and many more...
As our subst.itute, «He Himself bore our sins in His body on the cross, so that we might die to sin and live to righteousness» (1 Peter 2:24); «He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right
hand of God» (Hebrews 10:12; cf. Ephesians 1:7; 4:32; 1 John 2:1 — 2).
John Cobb, on the other
hand, denies that «Whitehead without
God» has coherency, at least
as presented by Sherburne, and the two Whiteheadians carry out their debate in issues
of this journal (PS 1:91 - 113, 2:277 - 95, 3:27 - 40).
The Office
of Readings for the solemnity
of the Ascension offers a lovely excerpt from one
of St. Augustine's sermons «de Ascensione Domini,» in which the learned Bishop
of Hippo takes
as his text Colossians 3:1 - 2: «If then you have been raised with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is seated, at the right
hand of God.
Rather than staying becalmed in the sacristy, the sanctuary, and the presbytery, the clergy
of his day, he urged, should lead a demanding, Gospel - centered life
of proclaiming the Word and celebrating the sacraments, nourishing their people with the tangible realities
God had entrusted to human
hands as pathways to the Trinity: the Bible and the Eucharist.
The new life in Christ, the consequent transformation
of all their hopes and expectations, the sense
of fresh power to achieve the hitherto impossible, the vital awareness
of the change which had been effected in their relations with
God, the confidence
of sin forgiven and
of restoration to divine favor, the «joy in the holy Spirit,» and confident looking forward to great events still to come, and soon,
as the result
of Christ's exaltation at
God's right
hand and
of his promised coming
as Redeemer and Judge — all this lies behind the choice and the use
of technical terms or concepts borrowed, first
of all, from current Jewish messianism.
When it comes to living life and loving others,
God is not
as concerned with the cleanliness
of our
hands or the perceived purity
of our words, but with the attitude and motivation
of our hearts.
On the other
hand, we have a conception
of God as both morally righteous and supremely loving.
JW, You keep saying «out
of nothing»
as though it is impossible and on the other
hand claim that it is only possible for your
god, but logic dictates that if a
god can just exist, so can a singularity.
In the Easter experience the disciples were assured «that
God himself had intervened with almighty
hand in the wicked and rebellious activity
of the world, and had snatched this Jesus
of Nazareth from the power
of sin and death which had risen up against him, and installed him
as Lord
of the world.»
I'd much rather spend my life believing, living my life
as if there IS a heaven
as a reward, having the comfort
of thinking that
God will be there when I draw my last breath, and being comforted with the thought
as I watch the world go to hell in a
hand - basket... and not be aware after death that I was wrong because,
as Hawking says..
After one has made whatever personal inventory and commitment one desires, it may be helpful to repeat in a relaxed mood some short, meaningful phrase such
as «
God is love,» or «In thee I rest,» or «Be
of good cheer,» or «The peace
of God, which passeth all understanding,» or «Father, into thy
hands I commend my spirit.»
The post is so full
of historical inaccuracies, theological problems, and contradictions that it's hard to know where to start, but I want to make clear from the get - go that my response to this post should not be seen
as an attack on Tim Challies himself, (who I respect and like), but rather a response to the general belief that
God's presence is limited to the pages
of Scripture and that all forms
of contemplative or experiential spirituality should therefore be dismissed out
of hand or regarded with suspicion.
On the one
hand, we could assert that the meaning
of terms
as applied to the finite and to
God is univocal.
Tradition is no longer a taboo word and traditional forms
of prayer are once more being rediscovered and recognised
as a treasure store and a priceless patrimony
handed on to us by the saints
of God across the ages.
To show Christ
as an actual historic person on one
hand and on the other
hand as the Son
of God,
as He had announced Himself to be.