Sentences with phrase «hand people want»

On one hand people want relevant experiences, and on the other hand there is some discomfort about how data is used,» says Zuckerberg.

Not exact matches

These people had great success and now have a lot of money and time on their hands and don't want to just play the market.

You don't want to overdo it to the point that you're distracting, but having distinct hand gestures gives you an identity and keeps people's attention.

Search - engine activity, of course, goes hand in hand with general Internet use, since most people are simply using Google to get to the information they want.

While I couldn't personally hand - count these billion fibers, I did appreciate the attention to detail and foresight regarding what people want when they sleep.

Cramton knew the accounting troubles were getting out of hand, but he was opposed to «paying people too much money to watch our money,» he says, adding: «I didn't want to spend $ 2,000 to save $ 1,000.»

In a way, the ban is every entrepreneur's dream — who wouldn't want their product to be so desirable people can't keep their hands off of it?

In his words, «It is amazing what we can achieve in this world if we just ask for what we want, yet so many people sit in the dark waiting for the world to hand things to them.»

Saint Archer co-founder Josh Landan said his San Diego - based company «always wanted to get great beer into more people's hands,» when he sold a majority stake to MillerCoors.

But he said he decided it was the right time to hand the keys to Mr. Johnson, whom he described as being «better equipped» to «run the company than I am,» ticking off a list of Mr. Johnson's operational talents, saying that he wanted to «relinquish the role and responsibility to the right person.»

As a startup founder you want to move fast to get your vision up and running but not taking the time to hire correctly from the start could leave you with the wrong people for the job at hand.

In almost every class of entrepreneurs I teach, I ask the question, and a staggering number of hands goes up each time (and that's after I tell people to leave their hands down if they want to keep their childhood private).

Republicans are faced with a choice — be on the right side of history and stand with the American people who support a free and open internet, or hold hands with the special interests who want to control the internet for their own profit.»

On the one hand, this short life - span is the channel's biggest strength: When a major sporting event is taking place, people want to see it right away, and they are willing to pay handsomely for that ability.

«We're at a point where people want things in the palm of their hand, easy to get to, and on demand,» Hoyt says.

On the other hand, «If people want me to shut up and take my money, I'm fine with that as well.»

If you know your community like the back of your hand, have an eye for real estate and want to help newcomers get settled, you can act as a one - person welcoming committee as a relocation specialist.

Most governments, on the other hand, want to be able to read people's sensitive communications in the interest of national security, provided they have a proper warrant.

What do you think of this strategy as a way to get money back into the hands of really creative people who have small financial needs than the big banks want to fund?

And after all, if people are handing over their email address when they don't really want to, those are just vanity metrics anyway, right?

When the market is riding high, people tend to want to buy more, increase their risk profile, and generally mistake a short - term fluctuation for having a «hot hand.»

Want to get IT off your plate and into the hands of people who care?

Fortunately, there are some investments that are geared toward people who want to maximize returns without getting too hands - on.

«Our volunteer model is pretty unique in the fact that we provide a free and open door opportunity [to volunteers], removing boundaries for people who want to help,» Lauren Muldowney, Chief of Volunteer Experience at All Hands and Hearts, told Global Citizen.

Some are young, and some are old; some want to use their money for retirement, and some want to have it at hand to buy a house; some people have a high tolerance for risk, while still other people's idea of a thrill is watching compound interest accumulate in a savings account.

Even in more modern times there are people that consider it awkward though no longer evil and don't want their kids to be left - handed.

Why do you assume you can influence other peoples children by handing out religious tracts but only want fellow fundies influencing your children?

It's normal that people will talk about their family and want to be with them, but it is more important to put yourself in His hands and ask for forgiveness.

Do people really want some religious fraudster holding their hand as thy are dying?

But the dollars at least are used to purchase goods, rather than to persuade those in power to hand over other people's money so that I can get what I want.

It's also an easy trap to fall into, especially when we're not seeing the changes we want to see or have witnessed failures at the hands of people we trusted.

That the church ought to be put back in the hands of the lay people — those wanting a closer life with God?

Typical liberal CNN bias... the hand outs have to stop for those able to work... all these lazy people that do nt want to work are poor at their own doing...

If anyone else wants to come here and «apologize» please don't embarrass yourself, or insult the emotional intelligence of the very bright and empathic people here, many who have faced real abuse at the hands of religious leaders.

but if anyone truley had God in thier heart and had faith in the Lord... simply by folding your hands and asking God to enter your heart... (try it he will be there for you, and you will feel the joy of His love), then they would never do things like this... he obviously was not a person who loved God because No one with God in thier heart would want to do thing s like that... you HATE sin when you truely love God, No ones perfect though, even those who belive in God we all stray from our beliefs, its human nature and the devil takes advantage of this.

If you want to alleviate the problem of mass shootings, better to try and deal with the root causes, such as mental health, and then get more guns into the hands of the right people.

If you want to reduce the number of abortions, better to try and deal with the root causes, such as poverty, and then get more contraception into the hands of the right people.

On the one hand I want to be faithful to all the good teaching I've had about listening, about empathy, and about the «unconditional positive regard» with which I am to receive the person seeking counsel.

On the other hand, I want as well to share faith and Christian hope with these people, to avoid shutting off genuine interpersonal encounter and my own self - disclosure because of any false allegiance to psychotherapeutic norms — and I doubt that empathy alone constitutes such a sharing.

If churches really want a total hands - off from the government, let them buy the right through equal taxation just like «we the People» do.

And as people so tightly held in God's hands, I want to encourage you not to give up.

bootyfunk your and idiot because that passage in mathew 10 its a parrable he is trying to get people to realize that God needs to be the most important thing your life because with him you would not be period so to say that Jesus Christ the son of God is promoting volience is ridiculous, it tares me up that people like you take bit's and peices of the bible and make sound like you want it to if your going to read the Christian hand book then read it all do nt take stuff out of contence just to suit your life style your truly and always be a devoute Christian

Christianity during this time was fundamentally reshaped and molded by common people who «wanted their leaders unpretentious, their doctrines self - evident and down - to - earth, their music lively and singable, and their churches in local hands.»

Even his own disciples wanted places at his right and left hand, wanted control of the «purse», wanted him to not associate with the wrong kinds of people, wanted him to soften his message.

I seriously doubt he would want anything to do with the hand full of crazy people in the world today who go around judging other people and preaching fire and brimstone.

with all and full respect; You know that your used name is dear to my heart, for having been a believer in God the Creator of the whole Universe he has all the beautiful names that we know or do not know, I believe that God starched his hand to mankind in love, sending among them his prophets and messengers to warn and guide to righteous, am not told to force belief or religion upon people of any faith or of non faith, am a mere reminder and Warner to my self and whom my want to know and judge their senses life is a spiritual challenge, life is a maze and only if make use of the heavenly codes that could be found in All Scriptures of God that was relaid upon mankind from prophets & messengers from Adam to Noah to Abrahim to Musa to Issa to Muhammed which many obviously seem to Ignore!!

you, on the other hand, seem to want to shut down religious discussion because you are afraid of people getting their feelings hurt.

On the other hand, very few people could easily step in and carry on the role of pastor in such a community, nor would they likely want to.

This scripture does nt conflict in these verses we see the truth exposed as God allows satan to have limited power over his people to test them as in the story of Job.So was it God who tested job by allowing satan to bring trails upon him.Or was it satan who was the one testing him.Both are involved but the motivations are completely different Gods purposes are to build up his people.Satan on the other hand wants to destroy there is this conflict at work all the time.brentnz

Yahweh in hebrew means my Lord and is a common reference meaning supreme God.In the bible satan is referred specifically as the adversary in hebrew or slanderer in greek its quite clear there is no confusion.Satan is not in the same league as God he is sovereign in fact God has satan on a leash and limits his control particularly over his people as we read in Job.Christians need to realise that satan can influence us if we walk according to the flesh.In the case of David calling a cencus meant he gave in to his pride he wanted to know how many soldiers he had believing numbers would give him the upper hand and so Satan took advantage of his weakness and Davids choice displeased God.David of all people should have known as he as a young man had defeated goliath a mighty warrior and it was because of his faith and trust in God that he overcame.But it wasnt God that made David make that decision it was his own and satan tempted him and he gave in to that desire In the two verses there is no confusion if you understand how God and satan operate i did at one stage have the same issue with Jesus sending the demons into the pigs why would he help satan or at least it appeared that way?