Sentences with phrase «handful of authors who»

I know a handful of authors who make that much every month (although they usually have several books).

Like KDP, there are only a handful of authors who can actually credit their success to the site.

In the video below, Carol Topp showcases just a handful of authors who have made it big with their published works.

I also know a handful of authors who use InDesign to generate their books, but again, not entirely convinced I want to jump to a tool of that magnitude.

I guess it's easier for big companies to say I'm sorry to a handful of authors who actually monitor their royalty statements than it is to get it right in the first place.

** I don't know about you, but I have a handful of authors who are on my Got ta Buy It Now list.

Not exact matches

«There are only a handful of authors in the whole world who I try to find and read every last word they've ever written.

correct, they did not «author» anything except to take a handful of letters and say «These are what God wants us to read, nothing else, this collection, nay OUR collection is inspired by God and any who claim anything different shall be put to death...»

i disagree with you, i personally don't appreciate silly sycophantic articles like this, we all know Per is not world class, we all know the only defender we have who is close to WC is Kos.And how the author can be so critical of Gabriel when hes played a handful of games is beyond me.We don't need stupid articles like this, we need real articles which provide proper analysis.

The latest study to bolster this argument was presented earlier in the meeting by lead author Courtney Dressing, another CfA astronomer, who measured the masses and sizes of a handful of small transiting planets to estimate the rocky - to - gaseous transition zone.

(Those authors, it should be noted, include some members of the OGLE team, who used a handful of data points from OGLE to bolster the MOA result at the time.

After all, the purpose of RWA is to provide an organization of writers of romance who are pursuing professional publication, and although a handful of self - published authors go on to make mega-bucks, the vast, vast majority of them — 99.9999 % — don't make enough that they would have to declare the earnings on their taxes.

The «Author's Guild» does not represent authors, it does most of its work and bully pulpit speeches for publishers, and a handful of super-rich lucky ones at the top, who are anxious to protect their position of privilege.

While most of the top twenty titles came as no surprise, there were some newcomers this year, as well as a handful of self - published authors who ousted some of the most well - known names in publishing to take high positions.

While most conferences advertise the presence of a handful of literary agents at the events who will gladly listen to authors «pitch» their manuscripts, the Austen conference affords attendees the much more sought after and beneficial one - on - one critique.

News has come out this week of at least two authors who have declared that they will no longer write and publish their works due to the behaviors of a handful of people.

Like more and more publishers, Amazon Publishing is taking a gamble on authors who've already enjoyed self - publishing success, a far cry from only a handful of years ago when a history of self - publishing pretty much sealed an author's fate as far as traditional publishers and literary agents were concerned.

And this toxic culture is not only about the big businesses who must make a profit to sustain their systems; it's not about readers being trained to expect free books; it's not about a handful of authors scamming the system — the root of the problem is authors not valuing their own work enough to treat it like a business and expect to be paid for their labor.

Whenever I visit various independent author forums, I'm bound to stumble across a handful of people who say they make most of their profits selling online with someone other than Amazon (Barnes & Noble, Kobo, etc.).

A handful of them are correct: those who are already bestselling authors, and those who never wish to publish a page.

This time, when comparing only the earnings of «New» authors who debuted after 2010, we see that below a tiny handful of mega-selling Big - 5 debuts (like Veronica Roth), far more «New» indie authors are making a good living from their Kindle e-books than their «New» Big - 5 peers.

While print - on - demand companies have revolutionized the self - publishing print industry by no longer requiring authors to purchase high - volume, expensive print runs from a vanity press, there are times when an author still only needs a handful of copies and prefers to work directly with an expert who can help.

Something I've noticed over the years is the difference between successful authors and authors who sell only a handful of books a year.

For new or unknown authors, who typically sell a handful of books per month, 500 borrows — earning $ 800 in royalties — would be a windfall.

In a new press release, Amazon reports that one author, who'd sold only a handful of books before joining, has earned $ 36K.

It «s a bold statement that needs quantifying and of course there are exceptions, but in the main this post is aimed at the 95 % of traditionally published and indie published authors who struggle to get more than a handful of reviews for their books.

You see, I've also had a handful of authors recently who have found me and relayed terrible and unfavorable stories of working with a book publicist or publicity firm (or other outside / freelance help)[2] with an unhappy or very unfavorable outcome, similar to what Sharon wrote about.

The small handful of Big Five authors with Top - 100 UK ebooks who were also selling well in the US were names that would surprise no one: Robert Galbraith, Lee Child, E L James, Michael Connelly, Harlan Coben, Andy Weir, Jojo Moyes, and Paula Hawkins.

The legitimate publishers who have partnered with Author Solutions make extra money on the side, while the clueless author is happy as the proverbial pig in mud — until he later realizes that the thousands of dollars he doled out to the vanity press has produced at most a handful of sales, and his dream is crAuthor Solutions make extra money on the side, while the clueless author is happy as the proverbial pig in mud — until he later realizes that the thousands of dollars he doled out to the vanity press has produced at most a handful of sales, and his dream is crauthor is happy as the proverbial pig in mud — until he later realizes that the thousands of dollars he doled out to the vanity press has produced at most a handful of sales, and his dream is crushed.

The hard truth is that there are a handful of traditionally published authors who get that treatment.

2) The fact that traditional publishers want to give authors «a handful» of books to sign does not mean that that is what the purpose of the event was or that people who were promised space for books and swag were not cheated or treated unfairly when some got it and some didn't.

There are only a handful of authors in the world who can make a living writing and passing along those words to someone else and not doing a single other thing.

Not sure if it includes the data or not... but even if it did, it's unclear what a handful of self - selected survey responses from Writer's Digest subscribers, 42 % of which — according to DBW themselves — came from «authors» who have never even completed a manuscript, could tell anyone about author income.

(Although I realize Author Solutions makes a huge deal of the handful who do.)

What the study's authors concluded was that men and women who eat at least 10 grams of nuts or peanuts per day — about half a handful — have a decreased risk of succumbing to several major causes of death compared to people who don't consume nuts or peanuts.

The author / s and the handful or readers are probably in the category of those who believe periods of constant solar energy which coincide with periods of rising global average temperature is proof there is no sensitivity between the solar activity and global average temperature.

On the other hand, there's the goal of not disappointing and inconveniencing the handful of IPCC authors who would be told that they're disqualified according to the CoI policy.

«To be sure, there are a handful of scientists, including MIT professor Richard Lindzen, the author of the Wall Street Journal editorial, who disagree with the rest of the scientific community.