Sentences with phrase «handle simple physics»

A very outdated game engine that can't handle simple physics, a list longer than Santa Claus» naughty and nice list of game play frailties and a bizarre controversial decision make Aliens: Colonial Marines one of the let downs of 2013 and doesn't come close to justifying years of development.

Not exact matches

Part of the handling about - face can be attributed to chassis surgery — everything from front spring and damper tuning (softer) to engine mount calibration (stiffer) was tweaked to accommodate the manual gearbox's lighter weight — but most of it is simple physics.

Only difference between the physics that I could see, beyond a few things added in like perhaps wind drag or wheel friction, both fairly simple calculations, would be how they affect the handling of the car... which is where all the games handle it differently.

according to dice they both look equally crappy (run at pc lowest settings) at 1280x704 with no v - sync, no texture filtering and smaller maps and player count the ps3 uses spu based differed rendering while 360 uses tile based differed rendering they are both the same thing but the ps3 version is simoly called spu based differed rendering because the differed rendering is done on SPU and NOT the gpu the 360s gpu is much more advanced than the ps3s gpu (which is why the gpu can handle the differed rendering while with ps3 it must be done on spus) while the ps3s cpu is better at graphics calculations and simple physics than the 360s cpu but the 360 cpu does win in branch intensive operations ust so you know the 360s cpu can also help out with graphics operations and post processing effects just not as much as the cell because MS focused on putting more power into the gpu even IBM stated that the cell is better for more things than xenon but that the 360s gpu is «very sophisticated» compared to the ps3s rsx.

That's why I kept the argument in the top post above simple — limited to addressing only Jelbring and the EEJ paper so we could do adiabatic apples to apples reasoning, limited to a picture that even people who don't know much physics can understand — anybody who has tried to touch the handle of a heating pan and found it hot to the touch has direct experience of Fourier's Law, so whether or not they fully understand the algebra they know this happens — and appealing to their intuition as much as to the letter of the various forms of the second law (there are at least four or five that I know of offhand).