Many of
them happen in court cases or arbitration and the results are sealed.
When we assess the legality, we look at what has actually
happened in court cases.
Not exact matches
A class action status would increase the drivers» leverage to demand a settlement, which is what
happens in many
cases when a
court certifies class status.
Sociologist James Davison Hunter told religion reporter Terry Mattingly that he recognized what was
happening during a church - state
court case in 1986:
«
In previous conversion
cases involving minors, the
courts did not go far enough to state what
happens when the child reaches adulthood.
The Supreme
Court is expected to rule on two landmark
cases impacting same - sex couples this week and their ability to marry (I am loathe to call it same - sex marriage or gay marriage because it's just marriage, no different than anyone else's marriage; the people
in it just
happen to be of the same sex).
Hello to every one out here, am here to share the unexpected miracle that
happened to me three days ago, My name is Jeffrey Dowling, i live
in Texas, USA.and I «m happily married to a lovely and caring wife, with two kids A very big problem occurred
in my family seven months ago, between me and my wife so terrible that she took the
case to
court for a divorce she said that she never wanted to stay with me again, and that she did not love me anymore So she packed out of my house and made me and my children passed through severe pain.
If «directs» includes a
case where a US President «asks» (or directs someone else to «ask») a member of the Supreme
Court to rule
in a certain way while making it clear that it is
in the best interest (financial, safety, privacy, etc) of the Supreme
Court member to rule that way, then I'm sure it has at various times already
happened... just part of politics and human nature.
First, an individual can not sue a state
in federal
court under the Eleventh Amendment of the United States Constitution, unless the state gives consent or Congress waives immunity, which
in this
case did not
happen.
«Change does not
happen without an honest conversation
in our communities,
in our courthouses, at City Hall about how we have real reform
in the criminal justice system, real reform
in our communities and real relationships between NYPD and the people they serve,» Tina Luongo, attorney -
in - chief for Legal Aid Society Criminal Practice, the plaintiff
in the
court case, said.
Brennan based his complaint on testimony from David Wildstein, the star witness
in a Newark federal
court case involving two of Christie's former aides, who testified that Christie learned about the lane closures while they were
happening — and laughed.
On the same day community watch volunteer George Zimmerman made his first appearance
in court to face murder charges
in the death of Florida teen Trayvon Martin, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman tells WAMC that the
case is a good example of what can
happen when the public takes an interest
in pursuing justice.
«Right now, the way they're
in the law isn't actually the strongest and we rest a lot on
court cases and we want to make sure that now matter what
happens on the federal level ever, no matter what
happens anywhere else, New York has the strongest, clearest protections as it relates to reproductive protections and right now, oddly, those provisions are
in the criminal code.
In Western Australia when a similar thing happened (in this case it was missing votes), the High Court ruled that the election was invalid and had to be redon
In Western Australia when a similar thing
happened (
in this case it was missing votes), the High Court ruled that the election was invalid and had to be redon
in this
case it was missing votes), the High
Court ruled that the election was invalid and had to be redone.
«We advise our brother to go get actual lawyers to defend his corruption
cases in court instead of wishing for a military coup or the disintegration of the country neither would
happen for him to escape all the corruption allegations against him
in the various
courts of law.
An interesting legal question would be what
happens when two circuit
courts contradict each other (
in which
case SCOTUS is where that'd be supposed to be resolved).
He said, «What
happened in court today is that the accused person was presented as a routine to the
court that lacks the jurisdiction to hear the
case.
If five
courts of the land are trying different
cases in which a man is involved and one or two of those
courts let the accused persons go home on bail, what
happens with the other three
cases?»
The
case highlights both flaws
in the vaccine
court system and fears about what will
happen if lawsuits like the Bruesewitzes» can go forward.
PARIS — Few criminal investigations go on so long that one of the accused dies of old age, and fewer draw upon the opinions of someone soon to win a Nobel Prize, but a
court case in which both
happened ended here today.
Added Bailey: «We had no idea what would
happen with this but we followed it as we did with his everyday life — traveling to events, raising money for his
court case, taking his kids to Rugby etc., and
in the film we bounce back and forth between real time and how he got there which was based on the MMR scandal dating back before the infamous 1998 Lancet paper.»
They find that, relative to what would have
happened in any
case, expenditures forced by
court orders depend on which political party is
in power.
We hope the state's highest
court will take up the
case and rule
in favor of the students, but regardless of what
happens in court, the state legislature has the ultimate responsibility to fix a broken system and ensure that every child has an effective teacher
in the classroom.
That's what
happened in the Dan Brown
case: while he was certainly aware of the earlier book, and even used the authors» names to create a character name
in The DaVinci Code, the
courts found that Brown did not violate copyright because at best the books shared the same idea: Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene married and had a child, whose descendants are guarded by a secret cabal.
If that
happens, the
court is likely to convert their bankruptcy action to a Chapter 7
case,
in which their property could be sold to pay creditors.
If I were to file for bankruptcy, or a consumer proposal,
in Quebec, and after a year or two I won a substantial amount of money, what would
happen to these funds
in a
court case?
And if it goes to
court, all you scientists need to do
in a civil
case is produce a proponderance of evidence (a > 50 % chance GW is
happening), and we reached that level long ago.
In law there is a service that tracks court decisions and not only states if it was cited, but how it was cited, i.e. did the court completely affirm or reject what the earlier decisions said or did they differentiate what happen in the earlier case which made them only partially follow it, etc
In law there is a service that tracks
court decisions and not only states if it was cited, but how it was cited, i.e. did the
court completely affirm or reject what the earlier decisions said or did they differentiate what
happen in the earlier case which made them only partially follow it, etc
in the earlier
case which made them only partially follow it, etc..
The
court case going on this week with the EPA will have a major impact on what
happens in the US relative to CO2
This is something I thought would probably never
happen — a science denier,
in this
case German virologist Stefan Lanka, was ordered by a
court to pay 100,000 Euros to German doctor David Barden for meeting his challenge to prove that the measles virus exists.
That sometimes
happens because the
case is
in the news and gets a «public sentence» or the Judge has heard too much about the investigation out of
court, or even because the accused is a public and thus exposed person.
If this
case would have been
in Marion County with a real probate
court with a real judge, the stuff that went on with this
case never would have
happened.»
It
happened several weeks before the Supreme
Court heard arguments
in Gill v. Whitford, a Wisconsin
case that was the first major lawsuit about partisan gerrymandering to be taken up by the justices
in 14 years.
If shenanigans
happen at another point
in the
case, I will usually find a way to show the
court what kind of malarkey I am dealing with.
Ever wondered what
happens if you missed your
court date
in an Arizona divorce or family law
case?
If the
case is not settled, the personal injury lawyer can represent you
in court, prepare discovery documents, prepare motions for
court consideration and present a
case in front of a judge or jury that outlines how the accident
happened and how the defendant is responsible for the damages that you sustained.
Concerning the perspective of comparative constitutional law you suggest
in your title, I would like to know if you have registered another
case in Europe (or outside Europe) where a Constitutional
Court orders the suspension of a meeting to be held by a regional parliament: this is what
happened last October 5th, when the Tribunal Constitucional of Spain adopted its decision, ordering the suspension of a meeting of the Parliament
in Catalonia, scheduled for October 9 (see full text of this decision at: http://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/docs/BOE/BOE-A-2017-11409.pdf).
It asked the
court to tell the jury about that interpretation of the patent (which will now finally
happen, tomorrow, as a result of the Federal Circuit decision), and it wanted to point to Apple's own 60 - cent - per - device damages claim over this patent
in the Motorola
case.
What I think will end up
happening is that the Supreme
Court will vacate and remand
in Gall and Kimbrough, make clear that district judges have lots of authority to move up and down, and then eventually the Supreme
Court will take on of Scalia's hypotheticals (there are undoubtedly
cases in the pipeline that fit Scalia's hypotheticals).
decided
in a copyright
case that one had to look at a real and substantial connection between the defendants and the jurisdiction of the
court — or administrative tribunal — but not at where the server
happened to be.
If you're self - represented you should be able to pick up the playbook and read the first couple chapters and then jump to wherever you are
in your process and have a road map of what to expect, what your options are, different plays you can make
in court, what places you can settle, what you can expect
in settling, resources for where to find information on what's likely to
happen in your
case, the best
case scenarios and worst
case scenarios that any experienced state bar
court defense lawyer is going to be able to construct.
Don't be afraid to make policy arguments, and to talk about not only what has
happened in prior
cases but also what might
happen in future
cases, if the
Court doesn't resolve the issue at hand.
«While this
court must take and does take the issue of abuse of a child very seriously,» the footnote said, «the fact that a trial judge tells parents that unless one of them «cops to an admission of what
happened to the child» they are going to lose their child, flies
in the face of not only the CPSL, but of the entire body of
case law with regard to best interests of the child and family reunification.
An article I wrote for the e-newsletter of IMS ExpertServices, When What
Happens Online Ends Up
in Court, discusses 10
cases where involvement
in social media came back to haunt lawyers, judges, jurors or witnesses.
The Walrus has an article by Alex Hutchinson, «The People's
Court, A
case for universal legal care,» that looks at some of the changes that have
happened to legal aid over the last decade and a few of the changes to civil procedure expected
in British Columbia... [more]
Part of this can also be attributed to the ability to access foreign material more easily and the
courts» willingness, particularly Claire L'Heureux - Dubé
in Charter
cases, to learn about what is
happening elsewhere.
This is exactly what
happened in a recent
case in the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Ohio.
Knowing how county
courts and judges have handled similar
cases will give your attorney an edge
in knowing what is likely to
happen in your drug crime
case and how to prepare the best defense.
While
in most accident
cases there is at least one person (the injured party) who saw what
happened, sometimes
in personal injury claims the
court finds itself
in a situation where it requires to make a decision without any eye witnesses to the crucial facts.
To make a long story about a magazine suing a band over a font short, the band's bassist also
happens to be a lawyer and he defended the band
in court — and actually won on the band's motion to transfer the
case to California.