I can understand that approaching equilibrium takes a long, long time, while TCR gives a better measure of what will
happen over the next few decades (and that technology and society may be very different in 200 years time); but on the other hand, I thought nations had agreed to try to limit global warming to less than 2 degrees C overall, and not just to limit it to less than 2 degrees C by 2100.
I can understand that approaching equilibrium takes a long, long time, while TCR gives a better measure of what will
happen over the next few decades (and that technology and society may be very different in 200 years time); but on the other hand, I thought nations had agreed to try to limit global warming to less than 2 degrees C overall, and not just to limit it to less than 2 degrees C by 2100.
Not exact matches
Consider what would
happen if the Canadian stock market averages an 8 per cent annual return
over the
next few decades.
Global temperature not rising
over the
next few decades would do it, barring supervolcanoes or anything with a dramatic cooling effect
happening.
That doesn't
happen so much if people reduce fossil - fuel demand
over the
next few decades via efficiency and substitution of other energy sources, which doesn't
happen overnight.