Sentences with phrase «happen to them in the future based»

We advise clients about what we believe will happen to them in the future based, in part, on our interpretation of past decisions of courts and tribunals.

Not exact matches

«Big Data is about analyzing the past,» he says, and it's «safe and accepted» in our society to predict future trends based on what's happened before.

«All of a sudden we can start to predict what's going to happen in the future based upon a certain series of traits,» said Mendenhall.

I don't know exactly what's going to happen, but simple math based on the current level of interest rates leads me to believe that these risk premiums will be much wider in the future over longer time frames than they've been in the recent past.

Part of the reason that the price of a commodity futures contract is not a prediction of the future price of the commodity is that many of the largest participants in the futures markets do not buy / sell futures contracts based on a forecast of what's going to happen to the price.

They tend to argue that the scientific intuition that things will happen in the future somewhat as they always have, is mainly based on the fact that this has worked well in the past four centuries, and so is not the quasi-religious faith Davies suggests.

«How they message their fan base is different from how we've done it in this sport, but it's a great way for us to look into the future and how engagement needs to happen,» Igdalsky told SB Nation.

PUTTING BODY ON THE LINE???? I PERSONNALY THINK THAT THIS IS PART OF THE BUSINESS, This is the players» personnal problem based on the decision that they have made to be a Pro-Football player.This is what they are paid for (Millions and millions of wages), and they have to take the risk on their own sake.To give an angle of an undertanding perspective as Arsenal Fan and as WE all have been always doing, i think The players might have been frustrated from seeing what happened to Rosicky and Eduardo so that they do nt wan na risk so much for the sake of their future carriere as they are also still young.May be!!!??? We do nt know!!!! But for me: If they are appointed and have decided to engage themself into the PL game and the CL and agreed to take the wages then they have to do the task that they are suuposed to do, regardless of their ages and personnal condition.We pay the most expensive ticket with hope in mind to see our team fighting NOT FORCELY WINNING.Evrybody here understand all the PBM, and i repeat again, EVEN IF WE HAVE LOST THE GAME BUT WE DID GIVE OUR BEST AND FOUGHT TILL THE END, THEN ITS UNDERSTANDABLE.WE WILL ALL LEAVE THE EMIRATES AT THE END OF THE GAME WITH PRIDE IN OUR HEART.AND the worse thing yesterday is that it was BORin mind to see our team fighting NOT FORCELY WINNING.Evrybody here understand all the PBM, and i repeat again, EVEN IF WE HAVE LOST THE GAME BUT WE DID GIVE OUR BEST AND FOUGHT TILL THE END, THEN ITS UNDERSTANDABLE.WE WILL ALL LEAVE THE EMIRATES AT THE END OF THE GAME WITH PRIDE IN OUR HEART.AND the worse thing yesterday is that it was BORIN OUR HEART.AND the worse thing yesterday is that it was BORO.

Note: This post is based on data from our study of long - term changes in UK central government, entitled «Yesterday's Tomorrows: Whatever Happened to the Future of Government?»

«In the future it should base its programme decisions on a robust and clear evidence base, follow best contracting practice and establish a measurement regime which allows it to understand better what happens to those whom they may have helped.»

But scientists working on a way to harvest oxygen from the iron oxide in lunar soil for future moon bases realized that they happened on a better way to make steel here on Earth.

The book value is certainly low, but Wall Street sets the market price based on what they expect to happen in the future, not what is happening today.

For my wife and I since we're both employed, we didn't take our net income together, but based our purchasing power off of one income with the thought that we'd be able to make it off a single income if anything ever happened (and would allow us to consider in the future one of us being a stay at home parent).

None of this has anything to do with what will really happen to anything in the future based on changes in Real World real timing signal inputs.

Though current and past data are relevant for any meaningful analysis, your decision has to based on future potential rather than on what has already happened in the past.

The uncertainty associated with this overhang combined with the bad taste left by the destruction of value in 2008/9 should keep a lid on the share price for the near future; I don't anticipate the share price returning to levels of early 2011 ($ 60) until the Treasury is able to do another secondary offering, and that won't happen until the price returns above its cost basis of around $ 27 / share.

This should be only an isolated incident, and can not be used to determine future access based upon what «might» happen or has happened in the past.

But instead of dealing with the facts and what is likely to happen based on those facts, many people are stuck in a doom - and - gloom mode that hinders their ability to make progress in the present, let alone the future.

This present - day dilemma posed by Independent Curator Annet Dekker forms the basis of Speculative Scenarios, or what will happen to digital art in the (near) future, a new publication that gathers responses on how to tackle digital art's conflicted relationship to museums and more traditional, offline exhibition sites.

Often justified largely on the basis of junk science they have come up with such wonderful policy prescriptions as using only unreliable sources of energy because they are «sustainable,» keeping natural resources in the ground rather than using them to meet human needs, having government tell manufacturers what requirements their products must meet to use less energy rather than encouraging manufacturers to meet the needs of their customers, all in the name of «energy efficiency,» substituting government dictates for market solutions on any issue related to energy use, and teaching school children junk science that happens to meet «environmentalists» ideological beliefs in hopes of perpetuating these beliefs to future generations even though they do not conform to the scientific method, the basis of science.

In any event I don't understand the paper's relevance to your claim that the warming is decelerating, since you're basing that claim on what's happened up to now, for which we have billions of data points, whereas the three or four numbers you quoted from the paper were produced by model runs projecting hundreds of years into the future.

When the witness selects someone, the witness» mind goes to work rationalizing that selection as correct in order to prevent the witness from suffering a torturous future of responsibility (based in uncertain recollection) for what ultimately happens to the suspect.

Once claim under this rider is accepted and future premium (s) are waived; then in case of termination of base policy due to happening of any insured event or surrender (only if surrender value is available under the base policy), the following benefits are payable: -

Once the company accepts the claim under this rider, all future premium (s) are waived; then in case of termination of base policy due to happening of any listed insured event or, on surrender (only if surrender value is available under the base policy), the following benefits are payable: -

Therefore, before deciding to «fight» for custody, think long and hard of the many options that can be implemented in your case in establishing a parenting plan that allows your children to have maximum access to both parents (not necessarily a 50 - 50 arrangement, but rather one that allows both parents to be involved in an ongoing basis with the children) as such an arrangement has been shown to be better for the children's future emotional well - being than one in which one parent is shut out of the children's lives (something that is not going to happen even after a custody trial).

The goal of discernment counseling is greater clarity and confidence in the decision about the future of the marriage based on a deeper understanding of what's happened to the marriage.

I could not square advising clients about what to do with their money based upon what had happened in the past, and then superimposing those happenings onto the future... ultimately for a commission cheque.