Sentences with phrase «happenings in the climate»

Even writings on so perishable a medium as papyrus, the ancestor of paper, have survived for nearly three thousand years with almost no serious deterioration, a thing which could never happen in a climate like our own.

*************** Like many conservatives, Dr. Will will not concede that something is really happening in climate change.Heat records are falling like a failed firecracker display.Our country's West has been burning up.A good deal of Florida is flooded.Chicago is exiting a severe heat wave; and kids are being killed nightly on its» streets.Freak storms move in quickly and disseminate large areas of the country.

A similar but indescribably more complex and momentous phenomenon happens in the climate system.

The type of decision facing Los Angeles and New York and other districts in recent days seems unique and new because of the threat of political, mass violence — and because it's happening in a climate that is highly sensitized to that threat of violence.

The signal any reconstruction method is trying to get is the signal of what actually happened in the climate system.

It's a round - up of happenings in the climate world during 2011 — with an emphasis on the Australian situation.

Mostly people wonder why individuals and organizations so sure that they know what is happening in the climate system are so unable to build a reliable model to forecast the future.

Oh, goodness, dear lady, thank you very much, I needed a good laugh, the idea of that happening in climate science is hilarious.

Dogma is very appropriate for what is happening in climate science.

But it's happening in climate science.

I was simply trying to forestall the initial answer I expected - that individual weather events were to be judged unlikely in a baseline scenario on the basis of whether they happened in climate models.

I have stated for years that the real case is that nothing of significance is happening in the climate.

You can see something happening in the climate literature (e.g. the Storch survey vs the IPCC).

Here is what frequently happens in climate science.

I was thinking about what has happened in climate science and beyond since the dark days of 2004 when it was touch and go that M&M 2005 would even be published, and what had happened to Soon and Baliunas two years previously.

However, the problem occurs when biases (advertent or inadvertent) overwhelm science because of value, which has been happening in the climate debate.

OK, that looks like an opinion piece by someone with no understanding of anything that has ever happened in climate going back to paleoclimate.

I see no difference between what is happening in the climate change debate courtesy of nutters like Lew and Oreskes and what is happening in the wider community, where the unwitting use of politically incorrect words and phrases is increasingly becoming the subject of ludicrous and lengthy official investigations which amount to little more than officially sanctioned witch hunts.

This, as climate models suggest, and what seems to have been happening in the climate system, is to produce a more energetic hydrological cycle, resulting in more extreme weather conditions — more severe droughts, more sever floods.

There is lots of evidence for all sorts of things happening in the climate.

It explains a lot about what is happening in the climate system, including a discussion on uncertainties that you seem to be worried about.

They see the bubbles fizzing more rapidly so they assume that the same thing is happening in the climate, i.e. more CO2 is escaping.

Yes, it's just sheer co-incidence that this happened in climate science.

«Everything that happens in the climate system now», the manager of climate monitoring at the Bureau said, «is taking place on a planet which is a degree hotter than it used to be.»

Just that there are other things happening in climate.

Maybe I'm not clear enough, but any * genuine * science happening in the climate domain is not really part of the memeplex (because it is tied to fact in some decent manner), but any science that has become corrupted via memetic influence, isn't science anymore, effectively, and therefore * is * dragged into the memeplex.

Can you tell what will happen in the climate (global mean temp or rainfall perhaps) when the concentration of CO2 doubles?

This is a familiar pattern in health reporting (is coffee good for you / bad for you etc.), but in more recent times has started happening in climate science too.

So I think it was one of the healthiest things that could have happened in the climate debate.

And it isn't a matter of denying the above — just that there are other things happening in climate according to science.

I expect the same will happen in climate science.

But these other things are happening in climate that make climate science as you know it almost complete bollocks.

In order to prevent this from happening in the climate models, the modelers must employ all kinds of governing assumptions that ultimately make any conclusion predetermined.

Whatever is happening in the climate and whether it's good, bad, or indifferent, social processes have long outstripped science and understanding of the physical climate, to dominate our actions in this domain.

It amounts to nothing more than a betrayal of trust when an «expert» tilts the data and or presentation of that data to elicit a specific reaction from non-experts, and that is what has been happening in climate science since at least the 1980's.

The potential for a bias to develop into a vicious circle is obvious; whether that has happened in climate science is a matter of debate.

David Appell: ««It amounts to nothing more than a betrayal of trust when an «expert» tilts the data and or presentation of that data to elicit a specific reaction from non-experts, and that is what has been happening in climate science since at least the 1980's.»

Hence it is not unreasonable that when we see events happening in the climate or weather system to conclude that nothing more than natural causes are at work, even if we do not yet understand or event see such causes.

A funny thing has happened in climate science to scientific inquiry: the usual ethics of free discussion and fact - based criticism have been discarded in favor of ad hominem attacks on critics of AGW theory.

That this hasn't happened in the climate science community is perhaps the most cause for concern

Learning must happen in a climate of reciprocal respect, where parents and providers feel comfortable sharing their impressions, ideas, and viewpoints.

Not exact matches

The poll shows about two - thirds of Americans think that climate change is happening, while only about 1 in 10 think it's not.

Seven in 10 Americans — including some of those who aren't sure whether climate change is actually happening — think it's a problem that the U.S. government should be working to address.

Erik Brannon, analyst with IHS, thinks the market is saturated and that the paradigm shift underway in the U.S. — where young people who matured in a post-2008 climate of cord shaving are now moving on to cord cutting — is happening in Canada but just to a lesser degree.

None of us know what will happen tomorrow, especially in political climates that are unstable, so all I can tell you is to stick to your financial plan.

Research group Climate Central has created a plug - in for Google Earth that illustrates how catastrophic an «extreme» sea - level rise scenario would be if the flooding happened now, based on projections in a 2017 report from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA).

The research group Climate Central took the projections laid out in NOAA's report and created a plug - in for Google Earth that shows how catastrophic the damage would be if the flooding happened today.

To speculate whether that summit will break the climate - change impasse, it helps to assess what, exactly, happened last month in Copenhagen.

No doubt time travelling sociologists are using us in a large lab test to prove theories on mass delusion; the worse the climate gets, the more we will deny it is happening.

Making the Pan-Canadian Framework happen (p. 126 — 130, 150): The national climate plan that (most) premiers agreed to in December will mean a lot of work for governments.