Earth's wet regions are getting wetter and dry regions are getting drier, but it is
happening at a slower rate than previously thought, research shows.
Research from the University of Southampton has provided robust evidence that wet regions of Earth are getting wetter and dry regions are getting drier but it is
happening at a slower rate than previously thought.
I assume
it happens at a slower rate while on the shelf, but will still happen over time as it becomes aged.
Not exact matches
Although the vole population also saw a large rise, it
happened at a much
slower rate (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, DOI: 10.1073 / pnas.1012714108).
Actually, the
rate with which the metabolism
slows down is pretty minimal and the weight gain which usually
happens in midlife is not due to having a
slower metabolism
at all.
It's still
happening just
at a
slower rate, which is good for us we believe.The total amount of institutional corporate loans outstanding was $ 994 billion as of March 31, a 12 % increase from the prior year and 4 % up from the end of 2017, according to S&P Capital IQ.
CH4 — yes, the
rate at which, as a feedback, a C reservoir is depleted with some fraction going into the atmosphere would be relatively more impotant if more of it is as CH4; if Chuvian runaway (thanks, wili) can be achieved, to the point of exhausting some (designated portion of a) surface C reservoir, with a CH4 flux, then there would be a cooling period afterword (setting aside other
slow feedbacks), and if the CH4 feedback were
slowed down, then the feedback wouldn't be as strong, and perhaps the C reservoir wouldn't be exhausted unless the external forcing were larger (this being a hypothetical discussion; no assertion that it will
happen).
The IPCC 2007 Fourth Assessment of climate change science concluded that large reductions in the emissions of greenhouse gases, principally CO2, are needed soon to
slow the increase of atmospheric concentrations, and avoid reaching unacceptable levels.However, climate change is
happening even faster than previously estimated; global CO2 emissions since 2000 have been higher than even the highest predictions, Arctic sea ice has been melting
at rates much faster than predicted, and the rise in the sea level has become more rapid.
It's ok to build a perpetual motion machine that causes an isolated system to spontaneously cool to absolute zero and stores all of its heat energy reversibly in a battery or a spring as long as it
happens at a
rate that is
slow compared to the
rate of power production in a nuclear reactor?
The effects of cooling are rather academic
at this point, since the world isn't cooling, the hypothetical long minimum hasn't
happened as yet, and the solar scientists are not predicting that the world will cool if that occurs, only that the
rate of warming will
slow, slightly.
More troubling still, the
rate at which the world was warming seems to have
slowed considerably, leading sceptics to ask whether global warming is still
happening.
Trenberth still relates the effect from CO2 based on 100ppmv causing an increase of 0.6 °C but does not subtract the 0.5 °C of natural warming as recovery from the LIA that has nothing to do with CO2 emissions therefore producing an effect six times too high for the effect from increased CO2 Trenberth is not aware that CO2 is not increaseing
at an accelerated
rate as predicted by Hansen but
at a near linear
rate averaging 2.037 ppmv / year so by 2100 the concentration will not be as predicted by the IPCC as per scenario A1 but merely reach a level of 573.11 ppmv by 2100, This is only in the case that CO2 increase is maintained but this may not
happen as the
rate appears to be
slowing down with the average
rate for the past 5 years being lower than the
rate for the past ten years.