Sentences with phrase «happens on a global basis»

That raises the question of what happens on a global basis where you have the same products trading all over the world with disparate regulation.

For an equilibrium climate, global mean outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) necessarily balances the incoming absorbed solar radiation (ASR), but with redistributions of energy within the climate system to enable this to happen on a global basis.

For a steady - state climate, global mean outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) necessarily balances the incoming absorbed solar radiation (ASR), but with redistributions of energy within the climate system to enable this to happen on a global basis.

Not exact matches

«I think there's still room on a global basis for more and more bookings to happen online,» he says.

So that basically will never happen given the huge queue on season tickets at the Emirates (I believe they will have to extend it pretty soon in order to accomodate demand) and the global fan base.

The researchers chose their range of sea level — rise projections based on what is most likely to happen to the west coast, according to dozens of regional and global studies.

«So far biodiversity monitoring has been mostly species - based, and this means that some of the changes happening on a global - scale may be missed.

The only time period that remotely resembles the ocean changes happening today, based on geologic records, was 56 million years ago when carbon mysteriously doubled in the atmosphere, global temperatures rose by approximately six degrees and ocean pH dropped sharply, driving up ocean acidity and causing a mass extinction among single - celled ocean organisms.

The second thing that's changed is with the Internet and blogs, the dissemination of trends on a global basis, I would argue, is happening much faster than it was even 10 years ago, certainly 20 or 30 or 40 years ago.

Based on the true story of the gruesome Ratcliffe Highway murders, The English Monster is a breathtaking voyage across centuries, from the Age of Discovery to the Age of Empire, illuminating what happens to Britain as she gains global power but risks losing her soul.

My answer — On the basis of billions of years of historical global warming periods, some of which happened rapidly and without any human influence whatsoever — and whose specific causes remain a mystery.

I find that even some of my most informed friends, people who explain to me what really happened with various space and aircraft disasters based on their own critical review of the available information on the subject, have problems discussing topics like global climate change, the end of oil as a fuel, because they haven't even asked some obvious questions, much less done any research.

That's how the contradictions happen because they aren't basing their claims on a consistent framework but are just hack and slashing manmade global warming with whatever they can and so don't spot contradictions.

This adjacent plot of 5 - year temperature change versus 5 - year atmospheric CO2 level change is based on the most recent empirical evidence published by the government's GISS / NASA scientists (and they happen to be some of the largest proponents of chicken little global warming calamities).

The findings, based on interviews carried out on 3 - 4 February, show that only 26 % of people think «climate change is happening and is now established as largely man - made», only 1 % more than those who think there is no global warming.

Scientists put out a new study claiming the worst global warming predictions could be 15 percent worse than models suggest, but that's based on a scenario experts say is increasingly unlikely to happen.

If you have an alternative widely accepted dataset that (a) covers the period 1860 - 1950 and (b) an alternative description of it that does not entail as strong a rise over that period as HadCRUT3 does I'd happy to evaluate your claim that global warming is not happening based on your dataset and analysis.

Most global warming predictions are based on fluctuations in CO2 levels and temperature that happened between a relatively recent series of ice ages, said DePaolo, who was not involved in the new study, which will appear in tomorrow's issue of the journal Science.

Lacis expressly rejects the IPCC's use of the word a «substantial» factor, and argues: «Based on this basic input data, the relevant physics is inescapably clear that the increase in atmospheric CO2 is indeed enhancing the strength of the terrestrial greenhouse effect, and thus causing global warming to happen — all directly attributable to human industrial activity.»

Don't forget that the septics also claim that there is a consensus that global warming is not happening, based on questionable petition drives.

Based on this basic input data, the relevant physics is inescapably clear that the increase in atmospheric CO2 is indeed enhancing the strength of the terrestrial greenhouse effect, and thus causing global warming to happen — all directly attributable to human industrial activity.

Our acceptance that global warming is happening is based on tens of thousands of lines of evidence: not just thermometer readings but melting ice sheets, migrating species, retreating glaciers and rising sea levels, to name just a few.

Most scenario studies collected for this assessment that are based on the idealized assumptions that all countries of the world begin mitigation immediately, there is a single global carbon price applied to well functioning markets, and key technologies are available, find that meeting a 430 480 ppm CO2eq goal by century's end would entail a reduction in the amount global consumers spend of 1 4 % in 2030, 2 6 % in 2050, and 3 11 % in 2100 relative to what would happen without mitigation.

Claims that global warming is not happening on the basis of short - term ocean temperatures are not supported by the evidence.

Regardless of your position on the reliability of our adjustments it is clear that combining these two independent subsets of the data in time - varying proportions without adjustment — as happens in the ICOADS data base — will lead to variability in the global SST series that is not climatic in origin.

The Pacific, and what happens in local waters in its east and west is the focus of ENSO studies and these phenomena are commonly compared to the march in global temperatures but its what happens in the global ocean that is really important for temperature gain and loss on a global basis.

The climate science consensus today is that these speculative climate forecasts, based on flawed computer models, did not happen and expert analysis of the gold - standard of temperature datasets (the UK's global HadCRUT4) confirms it.

I think global warming, per se, is probably not a «black swan», as you say, Judith (because it is happening today, for whatever root causes), but our planet's climate may well be so unpredictable (based on the very limited knowledge we have today) that it is pre-programmed to introduce many «black swans».

What appears to have happened, based on global climate model simulations run by Shakun et al., is not all that different from our previous explanation of the supposed CO2 lag - just a bit more nuanced.

Party members are in fact divided about the issue of climate change, a new study based on three years of data from the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication finds, with 44 percent ready to admit that global warming is happening.

So the whole premise of Shakun et al is based on the fact that YD happened about 1500 years * earlier * on a global scale than it did at Vostok.

The issue of concern here (in my initial post) is what might happen to bottom water formation on a global basis due to anthropogenc global warming.

Do you think the satellite manufacturers might be in the pay of big oil or do you think this may help prove that the whole idea of global warming, and the proof of it happening was based on the misunderstanding of the local urban heat island effect?

«To put it in a particularly Australian way, we don't plan for a bushfire season based on what is happening to global average temperatures, we look at the temperature and humidity in our area instead,» said Professor Jakob.

Moreover, no matter how «devastating for modern human society» global warming might be, it's not nearly as «devastating for modern human society» as what will happen if we accept the AGW theory and take action, based on the AGW theory, to STOP global warming.

So Cyanogen based on Lollipop will never happen on the Indian version, however the OnePlus One Global version will continue getting updates.

«The challenge is not only delivering value to clients, but helping clients make the connection that what happens with a technician managing a pump in the boiler room can have a direct impact on profit and loss in the boardroom,» says Trevor Foster, global director of management services for Dallas - based Trammell Crow Co..

Why it's happening: Regular work - from - home time among the non — self - employed population has grown by 103 percent since 2005, according to Kate Lister, president of Global Workplace Analytics, a San Diego — based research and consulting group focused on workplace change.