What it likely refers to are sector specific energy efficiency standards, not
hard carbon emission caps.
Not exact matches
Price: Though the policy doesn't impose a
hard cap on
emissions, it imposes a
hard cap on the price of
carbon.
Some people have unwisely taken that logic to the extreme and suggested that if the US and other innovating nations just pushed
hard on technology that there wouldn't be much need for
emission limits,
cap and trade or
carbon taxes.
Anti-regulatory blogs and commentators and the McCain - Palin campaign made a push to publicize a 10 - month - old comment by Senator Barack Obama about the high cost of coal burning if and when a
hard cap is set for
carbon dioxide
emissions.
The ancient Chinese mask - changing dance that I saw here Tuesday night (at a dinner for participants in a meeting on science and sustainable development) came to mind in considering the unraveling of news a few hours earlier of an official Chinese plan for a firm
cap on
emissions of
carbon dioxide,
hard on the heels of President Obama's proposed
carbon pollution rules for existing American power plants.
At the same time, Alberta now has an ambitious climate plan that includes a
carbon tax and
hard cap on oil sands
emissions.
Similarly, because nearly any plausible scenario would require a large amount of negative
emissions later in the century, the
carbon budget itself is not a
hard cap on
emissions.