Retailers who are on the fence as to whether they should invest money and shelf space to the travel category needn't look too
hard for evidence that this is a trend with legs.
You don't have to search
hard for evidence that teachers and school systems are neglecting them.
The point, she says, is that the study's authors looked
hard for evidence of bias and didn't find it, or not much.
Mike Penning MP, then a Shadow Health Minister, said in the Commons on 12 October last year: «I have looked long and
hard for evidence from around the world that the Government's proposals (to ban displays at the point of sale) are sufficiently evidence - based, but I do not think that they are».
However, one CAN say that scientists have looked pretty
hard for evidence of harm and failed to find any.
Consider this... a person goes to college, gets a four year degree in archaeology (or some antiquities preservation analog); spends summers sifting through sand and rock and gravel, all the while taking graduate level classes... person eventually obtains the vaunted PhD in archaeology... then works his / her tail off seeking funding for an archeological excavation, with the payoff being more funding, and more opportunities to dig in the dirt... do you think professional archaeologists are looking
hard for evidence of the Exodus on a speculative basis... not a chance... they know their PhD buys them nothing more than a job at Tel Aviv Walmart if they don't discover and publish... so they write grants for digs near established sites / communities, and stay employed sifting rock in culturally safe areas... not unless some shepard stumbles upon a rare find in an unexpected place do you get archeological interest and action in remote places... not at all surprising that the pottery and other evidence of the Exodus and other biblical events lie waiting to be discovered... doesn't mean not there... just not found yet...
Third, employers are looking for skills but they are looking even
harder for evidence that you know how to use those skills.
Not exact matches
He has lots of
hard evidence to back it up, too: if you measure prosperity in terms of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, not only has Canada been lagging the States
for years, but lately that «prosperity gap» has grown bigger — reaching about $ 8,900 as of 2010.
Trump suggested Monday he had little doubt that Syrian government forces were to blame
for what he said was a chemical attack, but neither he nor other administration officials have produced
hard evidence.
Kalanick definitely pulled the trigger on Singhal and sources said he also was not averse to Baker's leaving, as
evidenced by no laudatory CEO thanks -
for - all - your -
hard - work letter to the staff
for him.
All of them — mythical, magical, lack any
hard evidence for their existence.
There's just MORE real,
hard evidence for creation.
You're not riling me up... you're simply putting on the internet
evidence that all our founding fathers fought so
hard for is simply ignored (taken
for granted?)
Thomas was looking
for empirical data: facts,
hard and sure
evidence, measurable and quantifiable, upon which he could base his decision as to whether or not to believe in Jesus» resurrection.
there is a MOUNTAIN of
evidence,
hard proof,
for evolution - there is ZERO
evidence for god.
Again, if you disagree with this, prove the only thing that makes gravity stick to a 9.8 constant is god keeping his finger on the button and back it up with
evidence, or else you're just making baseless claims and still gettting angry at other people
for backing up their claims with
hard evidence when you can not.
I don't know who that man is and I don't know what was presented to him as
evidence, so it's
hard for me to comment.
It's
hard when you've been force - fed a series of false fundamentals from which your salvation lies (there is absolutely no
evidence for evolution!)
= > there is no
evidence that thought
for example is
hard wired.
Lots of meaningless words intended to maintain the status quo and avoid the
hard questions, such as «where's the
evidence for your delusions?»
The people who could have reinforced my faith condemned me
for daring to exercise it in the face of questions and conflicting
evidence: not just encouraging me, but demanding me to believe that much
harder in what I could not see.
Sure it is flawed in it's many ways, but to discount a lot of really sound science and
evidence that evolution happened and is still happening is really
hard for me.
I would «base [my] info on inre the non-existence of God, heaven and hell, etc» on the absolute lack of even a shred of
hard verifiable
evidence for these extraordinary claims, and the fact that even after thousands of years of frantic and determined efforts by the most ardent and intelligent proponents of these claims, they still have been completely unable to demonstrate them in any testable manner.
During its investigations the Senate panel probed
hard to find
evidence of respect
for law in the daily operations of intelligence.
For at least the past 15 years it has been hard to deny the evidence for growing inequality in the United Stat
For at least the past 15 years it has been
hard to deny the
evidence for growing inequality in the United Stat
for growing inequality in the United States.
I've tried to get this answer from many theists, and not one has been able to produce any
hard, verifiable
evidence for their god - belief.
Science had an idea, looked
hard and found the trail of
evidence, religion has had many ideas, looked real
hard for even longer, and has yet to find anything.
The band has been pretty tight - lipped about the release date
for their next album, but we are taking their radio silence as
evidence that they are working
hard in a studio somewhere on a new album.
Christians says faith is the
evidence of things not seen but the die
hard «the big bang is true» refuse to admit that all they have is
evidence for the thing not seen thus making it a belief.
I know it's super
hard for you to understand that when new
evidence is found, that how we see the world can change!
Topher, Re: «
hard questions» here's an easy one you have never been able to answer: «What factual, independent, verifiable and objective
evidence is there
for any god?»
Same - sex advocates are inclined to treat the latter questions as rhetorical absurdities, but the
evidence for posing them is not
hard to find» and, Not surprisingly, it generally conforms to the argumentum ad consummationem pattern.
For one, there is no archeological or any other type of hard evidence for the Bible's worldwide flo
For one, there is no archeological or any other type of
hard evidence for the Bible's worldwide flo
for the Bible's worldwide flood.
also — while you did not provide substantiated
evidence supporting the existence of your imaginary god — i'm still awarding you 3 smiley faces
for trying so
hard.
Sorry — but you are still holding an empty hand with regards to any
hard evidence for your faith.
While it is evident to science that there is a functional «teleonomy» or machine - like purposiveness in individual organisms (
for example, the fish's eye is constructed so as to enable it to see under water, the heart toward pumping blood, the human brain toward problem - solving, etc.), still there is no
hard evidence that life itself, terrestrial evolution or the universe as a whole has any overarching meaning.
There is
hard evidence for radiometric dating and its accuracy.
You said, «I know it's
hard for atheists to realize this, but there IS
evidence for theism.»
It is
hard not to believe that this was primarily an expression of sin rather than sincere faith, but there is strong
evidence that many Christians sincerely tortured bodies
for the sake of saving souls.
I know it's
hard for atheists to realize this, but there IS
evidence for theism.
It's
hard for me to take as gospel what I read in sports articles without seeing video
evidence, there are some very creative sports journalists.
«We felt like in certain cases some of the officials were looking too
hard for video
evidence to overturn their original judgment.
More to the point, if you're looking
for evidence of some vast conspiracy between leagues and bat manufacturers, it's
hard to overlook the fact that the solution to this problem is so stupidly simple.
For example, on other current threads, STSers have (without evidence) posed the theory that Dabo didn't announce that HJ or TL is the lead dog coming out of spring camp because Dabo wants to keep all of the QBs working hard and keep them on board past the point where they could transfer for 20
For example, on other current threads, STSers have (without
evidence) posed the theory that Dabo didn't announce that HJ or TL is the lead dog coming out of spring camp because Dabo wants to keep all of the QBs working
hard and keep them on board past the point where they could transfer
for 20
for 2018.
There isn't any
hard evidence that Bud's requirements
for his personnel are so narrow.
Second, he debunks — or at very least questions the
hard evidence for — the tediously regurgitated myths that continue to surround the side.
He works extremely
hard for his side by chasing lost causes and unnerving defenders, while he also has the vision to pick out players in better positions, as
evidenced by his eight assists in 20 games this season.
Even if bids are made
for any of the loan players, or
for the first team itself, and the club accept them it is
hard to find
evidence to say Rodgers will have made a bad judgement.
The equation is that simple
for Jürgen Klopp and his players after this emphatic victory over an abject West Ham United side, and it is
hard to see Liverpool passing up the opportunity of a top - four finish on the
evidence of this performance.
It's
hard for some to navigate what authors David and Claudia Arp call «the second half of marriage» — the years that come post-kids — as
evidenced by the divorce rate among baby boomers, which has jumped by more than 50 percent over the past 20 years.