Sentences with phrase «hard for the global warming»

I agree with you about the human connection «warmth = good» making it hard for the global warming story to raise alarm.

Not exact matches

Rising levels of CO2 are making it hard for fish to breathe in addition to exacerbating global warming and ocean acidification

It's sad but true that life is getting harder for polar bears due to global warming.

Idyllic settings and lush greens at golf courses are the product of a global research effort working hard to prepare the industry for global warming

Local pressures, in particular overfishing, destructive fishing, and pollution from nearby land - based human activity, are paramount, but global warming has caused increased bleaching and ocean acidification, which makes it harder for corals to grow, compounding the problems, the World Resources Institute (WRI) and 24 other organizations concluded in «Reefs at Risk Revisited,» an update of a 1998 report.

Rising temperatures due to global warming will make it harder for many aircraft around the world to take off in coming decades, says a new study.

You May Also Like: Spike in Alaska Wildfires is Worsening Global Warming Ocean Acidification Making It Harder For Fish to Breathe EPA Moves to Regulate Oil and Gas Methane Emissions Increasing Tornado Extremes

[Response: That's hard to measure, but models suggest that it is something like a 2 % global increase for a degree of warming.

Second, since I mainly read the Times and have not read WSJ editorials recently (though I used to read the WSJ regularly), it is hard for me to even fathom the notion that the WSJ's editorial folks deny or minimize the global warming problem, if that's the case.

It is getting harder and harder to deny the scientific evidence of global warming, even for the skeptics.

A book I like for putting a bunch of useful material in one place is Global Warming: The Hard Science by L.D. Danny Harvey, Pearson Education Limited 2000.

Thanking the government of Peru for hosting the UN Climate Change Conference, or COP20, John Kerry applauded the delegates for their hard work to bring global warming under control.

Whoever wrote the press release for this paper tried hard to suggest the cause of the 2004 - 2006 event might have been «thin» winter ice caused by global warming that was later deformed into thick spring ice, an absurd excuse that has been tried before (discussed here).

all that will happen is Europe will lurch even harder to the left, heaping expense and cost on us poor suffering fools (because we allow this to happen) to cover for the lost money Trump will pull out of the bloated coffers of Mann Made Global Warming ™!!!

You May Also Like: Spike in Alaska Wildfires is Worsening Global Warming Ocean Acidification Making It Harder For Fish to Breathe EPA Moves to Regulate Oil and Gas Methane Emissions Increasing Tornado Extremes

If you were a nerdy scientist and could a great salary for playing computer games in an air - conditioned office, get in the media by making a scary climate prediction, and possibly become famous — maybe even getting to fly to an overseas global warming conference in Al Gore's private jet, and while doing all of this you can tell everyone you are working» hard» (9 am to 5 pm heh heh) «to save the Earth»....

Considering the number of candidates who ran for and got elected to the US Congress whose platform included the position that global warming is a hoax and a conspiracy I find it hard to believe the «dogma problem» is one which can be solved by asking scientists to change their behaviour.

«The press has invested a lot in supporting all the global - warming frenzy, so it's going to be very hard for them to back out of this in a graceful way.

On the minus side, even the most raving die - hard skeptic is going to have all the evidence they need for global warming.

For all the thunder and fury the original hockey stick generated (and I trust Mann and his team have their hard hats at the ready again), it's not the hinge - pin argument for global warmiFor all the thunder and fury the original hockey stick generated (and I trust Mann and his team have their hard hats at the ready again), it's not the hinge - pin argument for global warmifor global warming.

For years, as I gave climate change talks, especially to my South County Toastmasters group, a conservative climate change contrarian would confront me with statements like, «It is hard for me to accept global warming when Al Gore lives in a big mansion and flies on private jeFor years, as I gave climate change talks, especially to my South County Toastmasters group, a conservative climate change contrarian would confront me with statements like, «It is hard for me to accept global warming when Al Gore lives in a big mansion and flies on private jefor me to accept global warming when Al Gore lives in a big mansion and flies on private jets.

It's hard to find an explanation for the global temperature record in the El Niño / La Niña Southern Oscillation (ENSO), although that climatic oscillation did play a major role in influencing weather patterns worldwide throughout 2010, as ENSO switched from a warm El Niño in early 2010 to a powerful La Niña somewhere from July — showing little interest in the intermediate.

On the plus side, even the most raving die - hard skeptic is going to have all the evidence they need for global warming.

The radar measurements in the Arctic tell the warming story in a way that will be hard for the global - warming skeptics to refute.

Since the available hard data showed that polar bear populations have been soaring, not dropping, and since the hard data also show there has been no measurable global warming for at least 18 years, the PBSG had to come up with a scenario that would contradict this rosy trend.

To be honest, the evidence for global warming is so blatantly obviously everywhere, so incredibly pervasive that it becomes hard for anyone with a scientific mind to treat those that can't see the obviousness with dislike.

But it would be hard for the federal government to spends billions of dollars a year on a controversial topic, with every penny of the spending based on the presumption that global warming is a serious crisis worthy of billions of tax dollars, and not have those billions make a powerful impression on the public.

Bob, I think the notion of a modern grand maximum which provides a hand - waving mechanism for natural variability to explain all the global warming that occurred late last century is hard for AGW skeptics to give up.

Scientists say it is hard to tell if El Niño and global warming are inter-related, which again, is just scientist speak for «they have no clue if the two are connected.»

The more facts that pile up about global warming, the greater the resistance to them grows, making it harder to enact measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and prepare communities for the inevitable change ahead.

It's hard to think of ways to resuscitate the public image of a guy who, only last week, was threatening to sue Minnesotans For Global Warming.

Consequently, for large hard emissions floors, atmospheric levels of CO2 continue to rise throughout our 750 - year simulation, and are still increasing at the end of the experiment, along with associated levels of mean global warming.

It's hard enough for the «experts» to even explain why the Arctic basin warming took off in recent years, while the Southern Ocean basin did the exact opposite, let alone trying to make sense of this global «mishmash» using the rather lame construct of CO2 greenhouse gas causation.

Unfortunately, when scientists say «we COULD all die in the next five minutes because of global warming», the politicians have a nasty habit of making it hard for me to pay my heating bill.

I think the evidence for anthropogenic global warming is as hard as any other accepted physical theory.

Yes, it's hard to argue the opposite because that would entail actually collecting data and analyzing it, as done for example by William Nordhaus in his book «A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies».

This may sound hard to believe especially considering «global warming» has been dominating human perception for years.

Given the acknowledged uncertainties and limitations expressed in the title, it is hard to believe that the graph showcased in the paper would later become the poster child of certainty for a scientific consensus on global warming — but it would become just that.

With the model so far off from reality, independent scientists say it's hard to make an argument for ethanol as a global warming policy.

For example: it's very hard to say whether an individual hurricane was «caused» by global warming.

It's getting hard out there for a global - warming sceptic.

I would be willing to wager hard cash that there are few, if any, people that are concerned about Global Warming and the potential for harm it presents who would like nothing better than to have solid, irrefutable evidence it won't be a problem.

For rural women in developing countries — the majority of the world's farmers — global warming means harder work and diminishing returns.

That is why America owes denier William Grey and Kyoto - fighter George Bush so many kudos for standing tall against the nihilism of the Left's Doomsday Global Warming Machine when it was the most hard for anyone to do that.

When Trump wrote on Twitter on 6 November, 2012, that «the concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make US manufacturing non-competitive», he was either ignoring or ignorant of the hard historical facts.

According to Harris Interactive, «The sharp drop in those who believe that greenhouse emissions will cause global warming will make it harder for leaders to introduce new policies to promote alternative energy sources and reduce our carbon footprint.»

I wonder how hard it was for him to acknowledge that other more significant processes than global warming could be causing increased hurricane activity.

If you look at the information closely, there is NO hard causal link between CO2 and global heating, AND there certainly is NO human CO2 signal that can even be detected as a cause for warming.

> There can be little doubt that it would have been much harder to sell the idea of manmade global warming if the Third Assessment Report had been illustrated with, for example, Briffa's reconstruction.

And it's hard to say how much of the confusion is wilful when some folks, in one breath tell you that it's crazy for «warmists» to think that only humans affect global climate, and in the next claim that an alleged «pause» in warming means that steadily - increasing CO2 levels «can't» be responsible — a claim that could only make sensse if CO2 * were * the only thing affecting the temps.