Not exact matches
But as
climate change melts this ice, the bears have to work
harder to find prey, and that's taking a toll
on their health, researchers report today in
Science.
«Information
on climate change ranges in geographic and temporal scales, and is often hard to relate to forest management and planning,» said Patricia Butler, the report's lead author and a climate change outreach specialist with the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science, a collaboration of the Forest Service, Michigan Technological University, the Trust for Public Land, the University of Minnesota, and the National Council for Air and Stream Impro
climate change ranges in geographic and temporal scales, and is often
hard to relate to forest management and planning,» said Patricia Butler, the report's lead author and a
climate change outreach specialist with the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science, a collaboration of the Forest Service, Michigan Technological University, the Trust for Public Land, the University of Minnesota, and the National Council for Air and Stream Impro
climate change outreach specialist with the Northern Institute of Applied
Climate Science, a collaboration of the Forest Service, Michigan Technological University, the Trust for Public Land, the University of Minnesota, and the National Council for Air and Stream Impro
Climate Science, a collaboration of the Forest Service, Michigan Technological University, the Trust for Public Land, the University of Minnesota, and the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement.
Recently several of my posts
on the subject of
climate change — including one last week titled» In Climate Science, Predictions Are Hard, Especially The As Long as It Sounds Foreign trope as used in popular c
climate change — including one last week titled» In
Climate Science, Predictions Are Hard, Especially The As Long as It Sounds Foreign trope as used in popular c
Climate Science, Predictions Are
Hard, Especially The As Long as It Sounds Foreign trope as used in popular culture.
In light of the
hard - won scientific consensus developed by the IPCC, has the time not yet come to «center» our discussion
on what we know of
climate change, based upon good
science, and talk about what we are going to do in order to address the human - driven predicament in which humanity finds itself in these early years of Century XXI?
Many seasoned observers of
climate science and policy feel it's
hard to see how they will, given the pressures
on political figures to focus
on the here and now, and the variegated interests arrayed at the ranks of tables — from shrinking island states to oil monarchies to established and emerging powers sitting
on mountains of coal — and the tough time our species has recognizing slow but consequential
changes.
Dave Slade had tried to add social
sciences to the Department of Energy global
change budget in 1980, but the incoming DOE secretary for the Reagan Administration (president of a dentistry school from South Carolina, as I recall) stopped that (why would DOE be studying the potato famine in Ireland as an analog for the impacts of
climate change on countries)-RRB- and shifted responsibility for the
climate change research effort away from Dave Slade and the Office of Health and Environmental Research to the Office of Basic Energy
Sciences — so focus
on the
hard sciences was the lesson.
At one point Mr Bevis stated that Labor was following the «
science»
on climate change, at which point I surmised that you'd be
hard - pressed to find a credible
climate scientist advocating a five per cent cut.
The United States government has spent enormous sums
on global warming /
climate change issues, including
science research, although the ocean of funding is so large, fed by so many rivers of tax dollars, that it's
hard to tally it all up.
«The
Science Explained, With all the MEDIA attention
on climate change, it can be
hard to separate MEDIA HYPE from scientific fact.»
The
science on climate change and extreme weather is nuanced, and sometimes
hard to navigate.
Right now academia, the media, and think tanks are working very
hard and the new Next Generation
Science Standards require (I read the NAS workshop program that came out recently) that the focus be
on changing beliefs about
climate change and new values in ways that discredit the rational mind completely.
This organization has worked very
hard to summarize the latest
science on climate change, with thousands of donated hours from scientists around the globe.
Hard to find any facts, but he does offer the following: «The
science on climate change has long been settled, and scientists agree that we must take urgent, aggressive action.»
On that basis, the report concludes that while continued oil sands production will make it very hard for Canada to meet its national emission reduction targets — which again it's worth pointing out, are in line with those of the US and far far below what science says is needed to minimize the impacts of climate change — on a global basis «elimination of oil sands GHG emissions will not eliminate or substantially lessen the immense challenge facing the world to reduce GHG emissions.&raqu
On that basis, the report concludes that while continued oil sands production will make it very
hard for Canada to meet its national emission reduction targets — which again it's worth pointing out, are in line with those of the US and far far below what
science says is needed to minimize the impacts of
climate change —
on a global basis «elimination of oil sands GHG emissions will not eliminate or substantially lessen the immense challenge facing the world to reduce GHG emissions.&raqu
on a global basis «elimination of oil sands GHG emissions will not eliminate or substantially lessen the immense challenge facing the world to reduce GHG emissions.»