Sentences with phrase «harm a child for»

Don't you think harming children for life is a little more serious than Nouns being too involved with social justice!!?? Behaviors like these continue to make the Catholic Church look bad.

What is wrong is when someone implies or even straight out says like some on social media say, that I am harming my child for keeping that last fraying thread of my sanity.

It's just so weird and sad to judge other people about this particular choice (or any parenting choice that doesn't harm a child for that matter).

Not exact matches

Ensuring child safety while travelling and ensuring that each child is fitted into the correct seat for their age and size is very important to protect them from any unforeseeable harm, danger, injury and even death.

While Judaism contains the oldest known humane limits on the use of animals (e.g., harming an animal is punishable, slaughter must be painless, they must be fed before one's children, they are to rest on the Sabbath, etc.), it does not eliminate animals for use as food, manufacture, or for ritual.

All I can say is one day God will will and we all will be judged for the people we hurt and judge, but one thing I can be sure of is that when it comes to respecting people of other faiths I will not have blood on my hands for harming Gods children.

«Whatever you do to the least of my brothers, you do unto me» «Love your neighbour as yourself» «If anyone harms a child, it would be better if he had been thrown into the millpond with the millstone around his neck» «Let he little ones come to me for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven»

I can point to this as grounds for accusing the biblical deity of immoral behavior, e.g. I would not unnecessarily harm another person's other wise innocent children because I would not want anyone (mortal or deity) to unnecessarily harm my own children.

Just like the Christians who have no remorse for blocking the civil rights of gay people that brings harm to their families, especially during emergencies when they are denied being with their loved ones during death in a hospital and protection for their children.

For real, 100 %: most atheists are not like you 6 to 10 regular posters who constantly berate and insult me with names like «delusional» or snide remarks like «don't harm children.»

I mean, if a woman isn't even responsible enough to use birth control, what makes you think she's responsible enough to gestate a child for nine months without harming it?

There is no excuse for anyone who would harm a child, so I won't try to make any.

It should give children accurate information to equip them for life in the modern world and make sure they are not harmed or negatively influenced by unrealistic or dangerous materials and expectations.

It is crucial for us to understand that the child of faith will not be harmed «if the body is clothed in secular dress, dwells in unconsecrated places, eats and drinks as others do, does not pray aloud, and neglects to do all those «religious» things which some decree... one thing, and one thing only is necessary for us to know righteousness, life and freedom.

The rate of self - harm is over 90 % for children that are in detention.

He is the father to the fatherless, and the loving God, who prepares justice for those who harm children.

He harmed innocent children and as much as I understand you believe he will be judged in the end, he resides in a secular country that does not give him that benefit... we believe he should be punished for his crimes in the here and now.

Jesus talking about harm being done to little children should count for pedophilia.

Yes parents need to be diligent in making sure that they're children are out of harms way, but for you to even suggest that parents had the responsibility of warning other parents and congregations is absolutely IDIOTIC.

The report also found that one in five young parents worry about the prospect of their child self - harming or feeling suicidal and only 10 per cent of parents would turn to a children's charity or a church for support.

(CNN)- Pope Francis made his strongest condemnation of sexual abuse by Catholic clergy on Friday, asking for forgiveness and pledging to impose penalties on «men of the church» who harm children.

«For those amonst ye who do bad things to my gentle gay children will reap the harm that ye have sown.»

Though its primary harms may be to women and children, pornography affects all of us, for it makes serious statements about our world and human life.

What he does to bring harm to another might just come back to his children and he will pay for the evil bile he is foisting upon all of us citizens, disgracing our country for his dreamed of chance for be elected again and to again live off the government's payroll.

The children of these Family Radio followers who believe «the rapture» will come on May 21st will likely be very mentally harmed and emotionally traumatized by this whole experience for years to come.

He, to mind understanding, says, better for you to commit suicide than to harm a child.

But English law doesn't exclude that as a reason for getting abortion, because the law only requires two doctors to certify that the woman will be harmed mentally or physically by having the child.

This is why it is necessary to remind ourselves that desiring a child is not sufficient grounds for adoption, and that apparently simple solutions based on compassion are not always good solutions: Much harm can be done in the name of the good.

I did much harm to myself and husband and children by trying to turn us into a wonderful Christian family for many years.

This harm consists in the irreversible scrambling of three things: genealogies, by substituting «parenting» for fatherhood and motherhood; the status of the child, who would go from being a subject to being an object to which others have a right; and sexual identity, which rather than being a natural given would have to give way to orientation as an individual expression, in the name of the struggle against inequality, perverted into the elimination of differences.

This harm consists in the irreversible scrambling of three things: genealogies, by substituting «parenting» for fatherhood and motherhood; the status of the child, who would go from being a subject to being an object to which others have a right; and sexual identity as a natural given, which would have to give way to orientation as an individual expression, in the name of the struggle against inequality, perverted into the elimination of differences.

This is why it is necessary to remind ourselves that desiring a child is not sufficient grounds for adoption, and that solutions based on compassion and that appear simple are not always good solutions: much harm can be done in the name of the good.

I, too, wonder about all the parents who pray that there will be enough food for their children, or that they will be safe from harm, especially in impoverished and war - torn countries.

Or, if he does something that is so contemptible that my wish for him to FAIL exceeds my desire to win, e.g. beating his wife, harming his child, then I don't want him.

As a result, you'll see improvements in risk assessment, a reduced burden on mothers, reduced risk of domestic violence, enhanced resources for the care of children and better risk management — leading ultimately to the reduction of harm.

I have no problem with saying «I don't feel comfortable with CIO because it doesn't feel right to me», «it breaks my heart to see my baby crying», «it didn't work for us so we tried something else» but to imply that other people who do choose to use a method that is and has been endorsed by major medical groups are harming their children is kinda a jerk thing to do.

During my natural birth classes they were pretty much attachment parenting advocates (within limits) but they showed balance by saying that sometimes after you have done everything to calm and comfort a crying baby to no avail, if it you gets to the point where you are frustrated to the point of snapping and possibly harming the child, it is better to put him or her down step back and possibly call for help (grandparents, trusted friends) if available.

If it doesn't feel right, look into it right away, but if it's not harming anything and it's just a little uncomfortable and hard to do, but it's better for your child and yourself, then I would continue to do it for as long as you need to.

And there are a number of other unknowns For example: • We do not know what impact the changes would have in individual families.: • There is no firm evidence that the overall impact would be detrimental to children or mothers.; • We do not know whether current measures for protecting children and adults from harm are sufficiently effective in families where both parents already have For example: • We do not know what impact the changes would have in individual families.: • There is no firm evidence that the overall impact would be detrimental to children or mothers.; • We do not know whether current measures for protecting children and adults from harm are sufficiently effective in families where both parents already have for protecting children and adults from harm are sufficiently effective in families where both parents already have PR.

Some fathers themselves may decide not to seek registration on the birth certificate, nor to go to court for PR, because they believe these steps could • harm themselves (e.g. fears of liability for child support; and that contact with «the law» could expose them to prosecution in other areas) • harm the mother (e.g. her access to benefits) • harm their children (e.g. where his relationship with the mother is conflictual and unstable, a father may fear that by seeking PR his contact with his children will be disrupted or stopped).

It's heartbreaking for any parent to think of their child being upset and harmed by other kids.

As for the existence of people on the internet who are evil & exploitative of children, yes they exist (I know I prosecuted a few myself when I was a lawyer), but the sad truth is that children are more likely to be harmed by people they know best than strangers.

That parents are the cause of, and so to blame for, their child's self - harm, depression, and suicide is quite a bold claim to make in Palo Alto where many well - respected mental health professionals have taken great care this year to make clear to our community, repeatedly, that that is not the case.

Supplies: 2.5 cups flour 1/2 cup salt 3 tbls oil 1 - 2 cups boiling water colors and scents (Kool - Aid, Essential Oils, Glitter, Etc) To see how to make this fun play dough: https://youtu.be/3kkQfohpAK8 All of the ingredients are safe for your toddler or small child and won't harm them if they happen to nibble on a few pieces.

No mother wants to harm her child after carrying it for 10 months!

If co sleeping isn't working for you and your child, there's no shame or harm in returning to a traditional separate bedroom method of sleeping.

Because of this they have been manufactured with high quality cotton and gets stronge the more it stretches and has been tested for a high weight range to make sure that no harm comes to you or your child due to straps breaking.

Well worth the money, this is a high - quality play area where a toddler has room to walk around and, positioned away from items that could cause harm, it will allow you to have your child play independently for a longer period of time.

In addition to that, if doctors think that she might harm her baby, they will recommend that she is separated from her child until it is safe for her to spend time with the baby again.

Not all toys are appropriate for all ages of children and some of these toys can even harm the development of children when used with children outside of the recommended age bracket.