Sentences with phrase «harm children if»

That the abuse may harm the children if it continues and escalates is all but ignored.

For instance, a messy divorce can harm children if both parents are not on the same page when it comes to custody.

«Today's data show unequivocally that Mayor de Blasio will harm children if he follows through with his plan to force place unwanted teachers into classrooms.

But some appliances can harm your child if she turns them on, pulls them down on her, or gets tangled in a cord.

Supervised visitation is reserved for very serious concerns that the non-custodial parent will intentionally or unintentionally harm the child if they are left alone without a third - party overseeing their interaction.

Not exact matches

If you withold medical care from your child and your child is harmed, you are criminally responsible.

«Whatever you do to the least of my brothers, you do unto me» «Love your neighbour as yourself» «If anyone harms a child, it would be better if he had been thrown into the millpond with the millstone around his neck» «Let he little ones come to me for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven&raquIf anyone harms a child, it would be better if he had been thrown into the millpond with the millstone around his neck» «Let he little ones come to me for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven&raquif he had been thrown into the millpond with the millstone around his neck» «Let he little ones come to me for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven»

People have the right to leave church and organized religion, they have a right to question an institution that will do anything to save face even if it means letting children be harmed (and trust me, there are Priests that have issues with girls - my mom when to an all girls» Catholic school in the 60s and talks about how many of the priests used to «hang out» with the young girls out and girls have been abused), churches that are not practicing social justice.

If someone harms my child, it's not the right of some stranger to offer a way of forgiveness.

The federal government has the right to mandate policy on any religion if it is practicing a policy that harms society and creates at - risk children who eventually become drug - addicted, criminals.

The choice such as a) Drinking b) drugs c) s e x and you seriously think that if you take away the above from your child you are harming them in the long run?

8 With respect to those who refuse to accept Castilian sovereignty and the Christian faith the document includes this clause: «If you do not do it... with the help of God I will use all my power against you and will battle you everywhere and in every possible way, and you will be subject to the yoke and obedience of the Church and their Highnesses, and I will take your people and your women and children, and make them slaves, and as much I will send them, and I will inflict on you all the harm and damage possible.»

We are not harming our children, you would be the one doing that - no decent loving parent raises their child to think that if they fail to worship god, they will be tortured in a burning pit.

All seemingly turned from God except Noah / God repents / and saves a core group to start over / trying to protect His children is a common theme in the OT / I don't know much of resistance or pacifism, but if you tried to harm my grandaughter I would probably respond with whatever it took.

The most troubling aspect of Tracy Morgan's remarks is the bodily harm he said he'd inflict on his own child if he were to be seen acting in an effeminate manner.

At that point, before a new life has truly formed, if the mother KNOWS that bringing a child into the world in her current situation will do more harm than good, why should she not have the choice?

If you saw someone harming a child and you were all powerful, wouldn't you stop them?

I mean, if a woman isn't even responsible enough to use birth control, what makes you think she's responsible enough to gestate a child for nine months without harming it?

praising your imaginary friend on an internet blog is useless... he doesn't exist and if he did he certainly wouldn't be paying attention to this site... he's too busy allowing the catholic cult of peds to get away with harming children

It is crucial for us to understand that the child of faith will not be harmed «if the body is clothed in secular dress, dwells in unconsecrated places, eats and drinks as others do, does not pray aloud, and neglects to do all those «religious» things which some decree... one thing, and one thing only is necessary for us to know righteousness, life and freedom.

If it doesn't bring harm to God's children and isn't clearly, blatantly defined as sinful (which I would argue Jesus made causing harm = to sin), then don't judge.

Perhaps the humanity of the unborn child that everyone instinctively recognises is easier to suppress if you don't wake up in the night feeling a baby turning somersaults inside you nor be expected to accept chronic sickness because taking anti-nausea drugsmight harm the tiny life you are incubating.

And if one of His children has been harmed in any way, His peace love strength and ability to hold the internal safe in spite of the external would be enough.

If someone thinks that the spread of something (a disease, economic system or religion) endangers not only the life but eternal soul of their children and grandchildren they will usually believe that fighting and even killing is worthwhile to protect against this greater harm.

If we don't push back, we become enablers of a major attempt to harm children.

But should we object to the relationship if the consequence is only to harm the innocent child with stigma?

If they hold a Seder in their homes on the first night of the Passover, or take their families to a synagogue on the Day of Atonement, it is only because they feel that it won't do the children any harm, and may even do them a mite of good, to be exposed to a sentimental observance of old folk customs that are part of their heritage.

So sex - selective abortions are, indirectly, legal, if the woman's doctors feel» as one suspects they nearly always will» that having a child of a sex she doesn't want will cause her mental harm.

If the name is likely to cause the child emotional harm then someone has to think about the good of the child.

How then should we protect our children from those seeking to do harm if we remove our means of protecting them?

Or, if he does something that is so contemptible that my wish for him to FAIL exceeds my desire to win, e.g. beating his wife, harming his child, then I don't want him.

However, I would feel really irritated if we were practicing CIO, and I read about all the harm it was causing my child — no one wants to be painted as being a bad parent!

During my natural birth classes they were pretty much attachment parenting advocates (within limits) but they showed balance by saying that sometimes after you have done everything to calm and comfort a crying baby to no avail, if it you gets to the point where you are frustrated to the point of snapping and possibly harming the child, it is better to put him or her down step back and possibly call for help (grandparents, trusted friends) if available.

If the chain smoker or abuser is harming a born child, is the woman held responsible?

If it doesn't feel right, look into it right away, but if it's not harming anything and it's just a little uncomfortable and hard to do, but it's better for your child and yourself, then I would continue to do it for as long as you need tIf it doesn't feel right, look into it right away, but if it's not harming anything and it's just a little uncomfortable and hard to do, but it's better for your child and yourself, then I would continue to do it for as long as you need tif it's not harming anything and it's just a little uncomfortable and hard to do, but it's better for your child and yourself, then I would continue to do it for as long as you need to.

Forget about the notion that a mother might fly into a rage if someone tries to harm her child; the term «mama bear» now tends to refer to a state of mind.

But if you tell them they are harming their child by smoking during pregnancy, smoking and breastfeeding, smoking in the car, smoking at home, they will probably consider that a lot more hurtful.

If you do nt then there is NO scientific fact that the CIO harms your child in fact there was a study done in Australia last yr, they say there is no proof that that is the case at all!

It means that if you drink coffee and caffeinated drinks excessively, there will be definite harm to your child.

«If the parents want to have a family bed, it presents no harm to the child,» said Weissbluth, author of «Healthy Sleep Habits, Healthy Child.&rchild,» said Weissbluth, author of «Healthy Sleep Habits, Healthy Child.&rChild.»

«Despite the best of intentions, women are bombarded with messages that lead them to believe if they stray from breastfeeding they are potentially harming their newborn child....

However, if you need to stop breastfeeding earlier, there does not need to be harm to your child.

And in the end, if all the other factors are the same, there's no harm in choosing a ring sling that comes in a print you'd prefer over one that may look a little less interesting to you and your child.

If your child sleeps worse in a separate bed, there's no harm in waiting and trying a test run again in a few months to see if anything has changeIf your child sleeps worse in a separate bed, there's no harm in waiting and trying a test run again in a few months to see if anything has changeif anything has changed.

Assuming that their limited food preferences are reasonably nutritious, children will come to no harm if they take the same lunch every day.

Supplies: 2.5 cups flour 1/2 cup salt 3 tbls oil 1 - 2 cups boiling water colors and scents (Kool - Aid, Essential Oils, Glitter, Etc) To see how to make this fun play dough: https://youtu.be/3kkQfohpAK8 All of the ingredients are safe for your toddler or small child and won't harm them if they happen to nibble on a few pieces.

If co sleeping isn't working for you and your child, there's no shame or harm in returning to a traditional separate bedroom method of sleeping.

Even if your child does swallow play dough, homemade or not, no harm will be done.

In addition to that, if doctors think that she might harm her baby, they will recommend that she is separated from her child until it is safe for her to spend time with the baby again.

If you believe that your fights with your spouse or partner are harming your child's mental well - being, consider seeing a therapist.