Sentences with phrase «harm done to the children»

Is bringing the option of atheism to people worse than the potential harm done to a child by an «obey or your will be sent to hell» message?

While the question of what to do with information about harm done to a child or an elderly person is important, it is the myriad of more mundane questions such as these that are more likely to have an effect on the church's day - to - day ministry.

You might try focusing on the harm done to the children by staying together and being miserable, fighting, and leading tense, unhappy, and unproductive lives.

My case was widely reported because it was the first time that the British Court of Appeal had accepted that British relocation law relegated the harm done to children.

What idiot would stick with a position after seeing the harm it does to children?

To be plainly clear, econonomic neodenialism — as advocated here on Climate Etc by posters like Peter Lang, Latimer Alder, and Tomas Milanovic — is morally wrong because of evil harms done to children by short - sighted future discounting associated to economic neodenialism.

In addition, many parents are understandably angry when a daycare is negligent and want to seek justice for the harm done to their child.

You might try focusing on the harm done to the children by staying together and being miserable, fighting, and leading tense, unhappy, and unproductive lives.

This, to our mind, is a landmark judgment, with the court, in this instance, placing the emotional harm caused by parental alienation on an equal footing with physical abuse, and accepting that the harm done to the child met the threshold criteria of significant harm.

She has at the same time been trying to make professionals aware of the harm done to children when the child is separated from one - or both - parent / - s without just cause, and at the same time has had his or her thoughts reformed (PA) based on an implacable hostility.

Not exact matches

And, according to researchers, it can do you — and, more particularly, young children — harm.

But substantive debates on actual issues - or even the occasional bickering disagreement about the best route to grandma's - won't do your child any harm.

In an article in the Daily Mail, Google chief Eric Schmidt outlined his company's multi - pronged approach to «do everything in our power to protect children from harm.»

While Judaism contains the oldest known humane limits on the use of animals (e.g., harming an animal is punishable, slaughter must be painless, they must be fed before one's children, they are to rest on the Sabbath, etc.), it does not eliminate animals for use as food, manufacture, or for ritual.

«Whatever you do to the least of my brothers, you do unto me» «Love your neighbour as yourself» «If anyone harms a child, it would be better if he had been thrown into the millpond with the millstone around his neck» «Let he little ones come to me for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven»

People have the right to leave church and organized religion, they have a right to question an institution that will do anything to save face even if it means letting children be harmed (and trust me, there are Priests that have issues with girls - my mom when to an all girls» Catholic school in the 60s and talks about how many of the priests used to «hang out» with the young girls out and girls have been abused), churches that are not practicing social justice.

He is grieved because we are his children and he sees the harm we do to ourselves and others.

Who can calculate the harm done to babies born out of wedlock, to children affected by divorce?

8 With respect to those who refuse to accept Castilian sovereignty and the Christian faith the document includes this clause: «If you do not do it... with the help of God I will use all my power against you and will battle you everywhere and in every possible way, and you will be subject to the yoke and obedience of the Church and their Highnesses, and I will take your people and your women and children, and make them slaves, and as much I will send them, and I will inflict on you all the harm and damage possible.»

We are not harming our children, you would be the one doing that - no decent loving parent raises their child to think that if they fail to worship god, they will be tortured in a burning pit.

For real, 100 %: most atheists are not like you 6 to 10 regular posters who constantly berate and insult me with names like «delusional» or snide remarks like «don't harm children.»

All seemingly turned from God except Noah / God repents / and saves a core group to start over / trying to protect His children is a common theme in the OT / I don't know much of resistance or pacifism, but if you tried to harm my grandaughter I would probably respond with whatever it took.

Gwynne demands that youths memorize them, and he has a four - word reply to educators who maintain that memorization and grammar itself harm the budding egos of children: «Do not believe it.»

The ones who have done no harm to children?

I wonder then why Mr. Nye is wasting so much oxygen complaining about the great «harm» the teaching of Creationism does to children... though I may not personally agree with the tenets of Creationism, I do believe in the right of parents to pass their personal religious beliefs on to their children - whether those beliefs are Christian, Hindu, Muslim, etc....

Don't you think harming children for life is a little more serious than Nouns being too involved with social justice!!?? Behaviors like these continue to make the Catholic Church look bad.

Communications and travel make people aware of the harm done to workers, women and children and to the environment — in rich countries as well as poor.

praising your imaginary friend on an internet blog is useless... he doesn't exist and if he did he certainly wouldn't be paying attention to this site... he's too busy allowing the catholic cult of peds to get away with harming children

God would never allow «HIS PRIESTS» to do any harm to any of «HIS CHILDREN.»

It is crucial for us to understand that the child of faith will not be harmed «if the body is clothed in secular dress, dwells in unconsecrated places, eats and drinks as others do, does not pray aloud, and neglects to do all those «religious» things which some decree... one thing, and one thing only is necessary for us to know righteousness, life and freedom.

If it doesn't bring harm to God's children and isn't clearly, blatantly defined as sinful (which I would argue Jesus made causing harm = to sin), then don't judge.

This thinking did so much harm to both the parents and the children, and now a few years later they are still recovering.

Jesus talking about harm being done to little children should count for pedophilia.

Perhaps the humanity of the unborn child that everyone instinctively recognises is easier to suppress if you don't wake up in the night feeling a baby turning somersaults inside you nor be expected to accept chronic sickness because taking anti-nausea drugsmight harm the tiny life you are incubating.

Wouldn't he have helped the child rather than deny the child, as the church does to protect its own reputation over the harm of child?

More than a few questions linger in the wake of these six attempts to reimage redemption: How, one may ask, can we experience the process of letting - go without falling victim to the surrender imagery that has done such harm to women and children, particularly in abusive situations?

Please don't teach creationism to your children, or others, you will be doing them a great harm academically.

If we don't push back, we become enablers of a major attempt to harm children.

«For those amonst ye who do bad things to my gentle gay children will reap the harm that ye have sown.»

If they hold a Seder in their homes on the first night of the Passover, or take their families to a synagogue on the Day of Atonement, it is only because they feel that it won't do the children any harm, and may even do them a mite of good, to be exposed to a sentimental observance of old folk customs that are part of their heritage.

What he does to bring harm to another might just come back to his children and he will pay for the evil bile he is foisting upon all of us citizens, disgracing our country for his dreamed of chance for be elected again and to again live off the government's payroll.

How do you live with yourself knowing the group you are involved with covers up the harm to innocent children and keeps the monsters safe?

Churches involved in this kind of hands - on ministry see firsthand the power and influence of the abortion industry, and the harm it does to women, children, and communities.

But English law doesn't exclude that as a reason for getting abortion, because the law only requires two doctors to certify that the woman will be harmed mentally or physically by having the child.

This is why it is necessary to remind ourselves that desiring a child is not sufficient grounds for adoption, and that apparently simple solutions based on compassion are not always good solutions: Much harm can be done in the name of the good.

I did much harm to myself and husband and children by trying to turn us into a wonderful Christian family for many years.

The glorifying of this act in the media is harming our children by exposing them to this at a confusing time in their lives» Well yeah, I suppose glorifying that the pope made a statement does do that but what can you do?

This is why it is necessary to remind ourselves that desiring a child is not sufficient grounds for adoption, and that solutions based on compassion and that appear simple are not always good solutions: much harm can be done in the name of the good.

How then should we protect our children from those seeking to do harm if we remove our means of protecting them?

It is the rapist, not the child, who should be punished... We don't want to harm women, but there must be no intervention through choice to kill the baby... We accept there can be natural abortions, but that is the biological will of the body, not the chosen will of the human mind».