It's really pathetic and can be quite frightening when christians use the bible as a weapon to
harm people rather than to build them up.
Not exact matches
If they help
people rather than
harm people, does it matter what they believe?
The most hotly debated issue in connection with the 1983 Rules, in fact, was whether a lawyer should be required,
rather than merely permitted, to disclose information he has reason to believe necessary to prevent a client from causing death or serious bodily
harm to another
person.
At times this led to unhelpful confusions and excesses which have
harmed rather than helped the Catholic identity of some
people.
She didn't mean any
harm, but when we don't know what another
person has been through, it's best to err on the side of caution
rather than assuming the
person just left, deserted the ship, or whatever else
people might think.
To summarize, all of these six factors
harm persons because they diminish the self - esteem of the man in the pew, treating him as an object
rather than a subject.
It is usually better to mention the ways in which the
person is hurting himself and blocking himself from goals he desires,
rather than to call his attention to the
harm he is doing to his family.
My MIL is
rather like the first
person (and your co-worker) she is a
rather vapid
person and quite thoughtless, but she means no
harm.
Personally I'd
rather they spent their time working w / charities and helping
people rather than milling about, preaching that the world is going to end but I guess that in general they are pretty harmless and at least they're not the kind of religious nut that
harms other
people.
Personally, I think a lot of this ties into the tendency in some Christian circles to reduce morality to a system of laws that
people must follow («It's wrong because God says it's wrong»)
rather than an empathy - based system («This is wrong because it
harms other
people»).
Not all of the mostly - white NFL owners are callous racists, but they are all successful business
people, and you can bet they would
rather cut off their own finger than hire someone who is actively trying to
harm their business / extort money out of them.
This is possible, but it has always struck me that
people using this line of reasoning in the face of clear evidence of
harm are really trying to justify their actions,
rather than face the possibility that they might be wrong.
While staying to be within a budget strategy technique is called for, you might be far better off spending a bit a deal a good deal a large amount far more for a youngster baby stroller beforehand,
rather as compared to obtaining a budget - friendly young
person infant stroller along with having it
harms after a collection of months.
«Unfortunately, the park was becoming a place where
people came not to protest, but
rather to break laws, and in some cases, to
harm others.»
The country relies on a concept called» restorative justice,» which aims to repair the
harm caused by crime
rather than punish
people.
That is, when making decisions that affect
people's health, let's treat the studies finding potential
harm as if they are true
rather than the opposite.»
Silver's spokesman said, «It's really
rather simple - the Speaker, along with many of our members, believes that
people have a fundamental right to seek compensation for
harm that is done to them and we shouldn't victimize
people further by undercutting their ability to hold accountable those who cause that
harm.»
More than five years after the oil tanker Exxon Valdez hit a reef off the coast of Alaska, the
people who claim they were
harmed by the massive oil spill are finally having their day — or
rather, their months — in court.
Rather than prejudging someone and instantly writing him or her off, there's absolutely no
harm in matching with more
people because you just never know and have nothing to lose.
Just like in the real world, there are a number of
people out there that are not searching for a healthy long term relationship, but
rather for
people to
harm or to rob.
It's cyber, it's chemical and so if you're going to put boots on the ground, then why not put robotic boots on the ground
rather than put
people in
harm's way.
I would
rather have more potential fraud, because I will not get
harmed, while foolish
people will get
harmed.
Others say that the emotional support dogs can give to
people with issues such as depression and anxiety is invaluable, and that it
harms no one —
rather, it saves lives and money to the NHS.
Rather than focussing on the important but inherently incremental developments in the science behind the issue, the media would do us all a favor by maintaining a consistent message regarding the underlying issue (i.e. human action is causing climate change, and climate change has the potential to do great
harm to our way of life) and focus on how ordinary
people can take steps in their own lives to help address the problem in ways that don't require inordinate sacrifice.
Michael Mann's «hockey stick» graph is bogus There was a Medieval Warm Period, as warm or warmer than today «Climategate» showed that CRU scientists at the University of East Anglia were cooking the books Gore's film has gross exaggerations and has caused great
harm —
people feel they have been misled The IPCC is mainly politics — little science;
rather than calculating confidence levels, the IPCC voted on them!
The video is worth a look: Among the key points Muller makes are: Michael Mann's «hockey stick» graph is bogus There was a Medieval Warm Period, as warm or warmer than today «Climategate» showed that CRU scientists at the University of East Anglia were cooking the books Gore's film has gross exaggerations and has caused great
harm —
people feel they have been misled The IPCC is mainly politics — little science;
rather than calculating confidence levels, the IPCC voted on them!
They claimed that a solution to global warming should not be cutting emissions, but
rather «Work to facilitate movement of
people from areas likely to be
harmed by climate change» (PDF).
His optimism about the role of the lawmakers perhaps slightly underplays those areas in which
people's lives are more likely to be
harmed by or oppressed,
rather than improved by rules conceived for hypocritical or commercial purposes, although he does address briefly the problem of the enactment of bad or wicked laws.
Taking vengence out of the hands of the
person harmed was a
rather important step in creating a world where one could expect justice from the King,
rather than having to engage in a vendetta with your attacker.
In fact, personal injury need not refer to a physical injury, but
rather encompasses all types of
harm a
person could suffer as a result of negligence or intentional conduct by another
person or entity, such as a corporation or employer.
But, no facts above suggest that this has happened, proving that the
harm was caused by the wrongful actions of a responsible
person (like a foster parent)
rather than, for example, a fellow child in foster care, showing damages, and overcoming the qualified immunity of the
persons who allegedly caused the
harm, is pretty much an insurmountable barrier as well.
Rather, it is a case of the criminal law going after good
people who help others by causing them
harm.
Should any
harm done to an allergic
person be a matter of civil remedy
rather than prohibition?
The documented psychological
harm suffered takes the damages well beyond nominal amounts for embarrassment and humiliation while the limited number of
people told and the temporary manner of communication (telephone
rather than internet) go to contain the award.
Young
people referred to receiving support from non-specialist services
rather than specialist self -
harm support services.
So - called parental notification and / or consent laws for abortion, which do nothing to improve communication between parents and children but
rather have the potential to
harm young
people who are already vulnerable — and can especially endanger minors when they are victims of abuse, rape or incest at the hand of a parent.
People are just so emotionally exhausted and strained when they first enter marital therapy that any therapist who blames either
person,
rather than compassionately trying to understand the particular wounds and needs of each is doing more
harm than good.
After a series of experiments, psychologists Amie M. Gordon and Serena Chen found that feeling understood by a partner makes
people feel like conflict helps,
rather than
harms, their relationship.