Sentences with phrase «harm they do to others»

Another point heavily stressed in the Integrity Therapy approach is restitution for harm done to others.

As a witch, you must be looking for someone who knows how to act freely while minimizing the harm done to other.

A claim for an increased punitive damage award based on systemic wrongdoing may strike some lawyers as dubious on the basis that a plaintiff should not be able to claim damages for the harm done to others.

In addition to professional liability insurance providing coverage for harm done to others by a business professional it also covers the legal expenses attendant to either defending the claim in court or negotiating a settlement.

Not exact matches

Of course, fear isn't rational — you don't see people giving toaster ovens the side - eye, and many other things that people are afraid of, including public speaking and spiders, are unlikely to harm you either.

For the vast majority of all other companies, however, we do not have (and probably do not want the kind of) the brand equity with our customers to allow us to wear pajamas in a professional environment, so it could greatly harm the value we are trying to convey.

Throwing other employees into the mix — whether it's to demonstrate their superiority or inferiority — can do more harm than good.

But according to happiness expert and author Christine Carter there's a more fundamental problem with adjusting your behavior to please others — not only does it harm you, but science shows that other people don't actually like it much either.

Unless you're lactose intolerant, steering clear of milk, Greek yogurt and other popular dairy - based breakfast foods to save calories may be doing you more harm than good.

In the memo, he argued that Facebook believes its mission of connecting people is so important that anything it does in support of it is» * de facto * good» — even if it allows some to do true, even catastrophic, harm to others.

In other words, the market quickly took care of inefficiencies and the extreme volatility did nothing to harm long - term retirement investors.

On the other hand, if you have a coworking space in the direct vicinity of WeWork or in a relatively untapped market, their marketing efforts might do you more harm than good, as we saw last year when WeWork employees started to reach out to other workspace members in the hopes of getting them to sign a lease with WeWork.

Based on that fact and that he «did not make any threats of harm to him or others,» the report said, Barela advised that it was unnecessary to invoke a Florida law allowing police to put a mentally ill person in custody.

«The associations urge President Trump to avoid any decision which would do harm to so many downstream steel manufacturing companies and other steel consumers, our employees, and our customers, with little or no additional protection to the basic steel industry, while at the same time causing great economic harm to numerous other sectors of the US economy.»

Companies in technology, investment and other industries now say that the measures the administration is taking to help them may actually end up doing irreparable harm to supply chains they have built up over decades.

Many people don't understand that compared to any number of other daily hazards, nuclear power has harmed very few.

How do you prevent these people from doing harm to other users of your marketplace?

Not enough to take it away from believers who already believe, but just to stop the spread of your psychic poison to others as this does indeed harm them.

It does not mean settling for what's second best because a group of people, the majority of which are not willing to make the ultimate sacrifice of putting themselves in harm's way for others, are thinking about themselves as individuals and putting that ahead of the majority best interests.

I see nothing wrong with a religion as long as it doesn't cause physical harm (i.e. mutilation, torture, abuse or murder etc.) to it's members or others.

I would prefer that people leave it at this, «What two consenting adults do with one another that doesn't cause physical or financial harm to others, should be legal and they should be left alone.»

I'm all for letting you live your religious life as long as you don't harm others, but your religion contains words from your «god» that command harm to others.

Or if we don't believe, we want to continue to be good people who want to do some good on this earth while we're here, or at least avoid harming others.

I may not agree with his religion, just as I don't agree with most of them, but I will verbally defend until my last breath and keystroke his right to believe what he wants, short of doing harm to others.

I think that there will be some initial tears for those who have not recognised the harm they have done to others in this life and before everlasting joy is granted our unrepented sins (ie the failure to recognise, admit and change our minds about our weaknesses that hurt others I this life) are laid bare and the full depravity of our own soul is known to us.

And it does more to harm other's in their respect of the concept of equality than it does to promote it the right way.

If your faith gives you comfort and peace, wonderful... as long as it does not harm others... but to proclaim that it is the one and only truth is not valid.

I personally do not have the capacity to harm others.

Stop deluding yourself and live your life to it's fullest with least harm to others and help others to do likewise.

«Do as you like as long as you harm no one» — it comes from the truth that others will do harm to yoDo as you like as long as you harm no one» — it comes from the truth that others will do harm to yodo harm to you.

As I posted previously on here, «What two consenting adults do with their lives, so long as it doesn't cause physical or financial harm to others, should be legal and they should be left alone.»

Then it's not OK to harm others and disrespect their feelings even if you believe doing so is an expression of your love of God.

This is the United States of America, land of the free, last I checked... I don't force my personal beliefs on anyone else, nor do I expect others to force their personal beliefs on me... This family is not harming anyone in living their life following THEIR beliefs... Who gives ANYONE else the right to say they're WRONG because they choose to share their lives as they do?

They all have to do with judging and harming others.

Here is another study going the rounds on the web that claims that a law / rules - centered morality rather than a relational morality can blind us to the harm our behavior does to others:

Ultimately, neither side is willing to be swayed, making the argument meaningless, as long as each side doesn't make concerted efforts to harm the other.

When are we going to stop telling other people how to live if a particular lifestyle does not harm anyone?

He is grieved because we are his children and he sees the harm we do to ourselves and others.

Responsible earthlings, such as Arthur, do attempt to intervene when they are able, and within reason, to prevent harm to others.

But even when we do feel justified in criticizing those within the church, Paul is not providing a license for us to do them bodily harm, or even to slander them to others.

Are you saying that your religion doesn't focus on preventing people from harming others and establishing ideals to personally live by?

These horrible tragedies happen because people will not quit sinning and seeking to do evil, so it brings harm to others.

Furthermore, counter, if you require the threat of hell to behave in a way that benefits and doesn't harm others, then you are the one lacking a moral center.

I am TRULY wondering what type of communication would cause this type of person to do the LEAST amount of harm to others.

As long as people believe in a god there will be people whose «personal knowledge» of what that god wants will drive them to harm others, and that's why atheists tend to be down on the whole god thing instead of just letting you folks do your thing without comment.

History is full of examples of people causing harm to other people justified by their religious beliefs and their «personal knowledge» of what God wanted them to do.

Yes, Jesus was aggressive, but He never harmed another human being, or encouraged others to do so.

You should admit the harm you are doing to others by holding such an illogical position.

He decided to follow the religion of christ but does he know what is teaching of this religion obviousley no it teaches love and care for others and not harm others by burning their book, I don't mind if he burns his own holy book in private if he thinks it's the right thing to do.

I wanted so, so much to protect that woman from harm, but all I did was try to hurt others in my quest to drive off her attackers.