Sentences with phrase «harm to others who»

Property owners have a responsibility to reasonably maintain their premises free from hazards and defects which could cause harm to others who could reasonably be expected to enter the premises.

Yes those getting this for free are causing harm to others who are payind for you!

Yes those getting this for free are causing harm to others who are paying for you!

Not exact matches

We empathize with Mr. Huang's family, who are understandably facing loss and grief, but the false impression that Autopilot is unsafe will cause harm to others on the road.

We hope that men take your lead and stand up to expose those who are taking advantage of their position to cause harm to others.

«Rather than remedy its misconduct, China has chosen to harm our farmers and manufacturers,» Trump said in the statement, and he added that he's instructing the secretary of agriculture to take measures to protect farmers and other agricultural interests who might be ensnared by the Chinese tariffs.

Elizabeth Wettlaufer is a former nurse who murdered eight elderly patients and attempted to harm six others in southwestern Ontario between 2007 and 2016.

The Risk Protection Order is intended to temporarily prevent individuals who are considered to be at high risk of harming themselves or others from accessing firearms or ammunition.

He and Nicole Hockley, who lost her 6 - year - old son Dylan at Sandy Hook, pressed Mr. Trump to consider prevention programs that train schools and educators to identify students in crisis and intervene before they attempt to harm themselves or others.

The announcement comes on the heels of a statement by Vladimir Putin on October 10, who told reporters that the «use of cryptocurrencies also carries serious risks» and that the Russian state has a responsibility to protect its people from fraud and other forms of harm.

Not enough to take it away from believers who already believe, but just to stop the spread of your psychic poison to others as this does indeed harm them.

It is so sad that Islam is marked today by terrorists that I can tell you for sure they are NOT Muslims by any means; any one who harms any person or thinks of destruction to others is simply not a Muslim — Islam = Peace and not hate and those who practice islam as God want to be practiced know that God sai «Love for your brother what your love for thy self».

Or if we don't believe, we want to continue to be good people who want to do some good on this earth while we're here, or at least avoid harming others.

I think that there will be some initial tears for those who have not recognised the harm they have done to others in this life and before everlasting joy is granted our unrepented sins (ie the failure to recognise, admit and change our minds about our weaknesses that hurt others I this life) are laid bare and the full depravity of our own soul is known to us.

But add to this the knowledge that you will bring harm to many others who are likewise dying because the supply is limited and reliant upon funds, which you are personally unable to provide.

ocasssionally there are the radical extremist who want to dominate everybody and the world in the name of Jesus or Muhammed, are threatining harm to others.

This is the United States of America, land of the free, last I checked... I don't force my personal beliefs on anyone else, nor do I expect others to force their personal beliefs on me... This family is not harming anyone in living their life following THEIR beliefs... Who gives ANYONE else the right to say they're WRONG because they choose to share their lives as they do?

One small example of this in our neighborhood is the urban farm one of my friends and mentors started to provide jobs to «returning citizens»: It required the city to help give away land and clear vacant property and some startup capital from a local farming company, but it is based on the church's understanding of the needs of the people and explicitly tied to the concept that faithful believers can help disciple and encourage people who have been incarcerated for harming others, walking them through the transformative process.

* A «forgive only» approach when those in leadership sin usually leaves in positions of power those who may not be at all repentant and will continue to harm others.

That God loves and forgives those who starve or kill or harm others on a massive scale is difficult to comprehend, and even harder to accept.

I know people who have done it and come to no harm, and others who did not fare so well.

Neal, why do you feel you have to control the lives of other people who intend you no harm whatsoever?

We are not loving God or people if we refuse to justly deal with criminals who will harm others.

A good person is someone who makes an effort not to unjustly harm others, and correct their behavior in the future if they fail.

I can't help but think of Matthew Scully, who put it this way, «Justice is not some finite commodity, nor are kindness and love... a wrong is a wrong, and often the little ones, when they are shrugged off as nothing, spread and do the gravest harm to ourselves and others.»

Christians don't hate you any more than they hate someone who sleeps with others outside marriage, gets a divorce, drinks to excess, or smokes and harms their body.

You may be right (or not), but what business is it of yours to disrupt other people who are doing no harm?

We just need to get along in peace and not abuse or harm other's who do not see things as we do.

Religion is for people who care only for themselves, and never think about how they are harming others by giving money to these crooks.

Since Native Americans are not seeking to eject those who have taken their land or those who have come subsequently to occupy it, some positive response to their claims should certainly be possible without significantly harming any other group.

People who want to harm others to benefit themselves we call sociopaths, and as a society pass laws against such action.

Because they were concerned with their own impotence in good works and with the harm they were doing to others, they were not less altruistic than those who were concerned only with doing good, and inattentive to the evil consequences of many good works.

It is for those who are too weak to accept the reality that: (1) there isn't a being who will make sure, in the end, justice is served to those who cause harm and suffering to other humans, (2) there is a powerful being who will take care of us, (3) our lives have a purpose beyond us, (4) we are alone.

So, I know a lot of very nice Muslim's who «do not» belong to the «groups» that are doing harm to others (at least as far as I know).

«Take heed to yourselves; if your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him» (Luke 17:3) Those who sin and who harm others must be confronted with their deeds so that they might repent.

Whereas, people who intentionally contribute (by financial means or other) to the unrest in the Middle East in the hopes it will cause Israel to be attacked and bring about the prophecies of Revelation may actually be doing legitimate harm to humanity.

It can remind us that those who so cherished liberty for themselves were willing to enslave and exploit others; that a civil war and long years of struggle were required before the nation legally ended slavery, segregation and discrimination and attempted to redress the harm done to the conquered native people.

«The best Muslim is the one who is good to his / her family and neighbors, and one who avoids harming others with his / her hand or tongue.»

I does sadden me that there are people of all religions today, willing to violate many of the higher aspects of their faiths, to make war on each other, all sides killing so many innocents who have often done no harm to anyone and who usually only wish to peacefully survive from day to day.

Putting everyone who believes anything in one big category of loonies just because some people use their faith to do harm can not be justified and it serves no purpose other than creating animosity and bringing people further apart.

This highly ambiguous notion has done a great deal of harm, and has all too often been used to pour scorn on anything that can be labelled simplistic, overly dependent on authority, or — that other great bogey of today's Church — «fundamentalist,» which is usually a code word for anyone who believes the Gospel might actually be worth believing and acting on, especially if they belong to one of the new ecclesial movements.

Listening to others who have survived and been able to turen their life around from what the enemy has done to harm to what God has turned into good has been an inspiration!

I ask why do people have to be so dam condemning of other referring to Pope Francis among other «who offer no harm to them but a common conversation in how to get along in this world.

This harm consists in the irreversible scrambling of three things: genealogies, by substituting «parenting» for fatherhood and motherhood; the status of the child, who would go from being a subject to being an object to which others have a right; and sexual identity, which rather than being a natural given would have to give way to orientation as an individual expression, in the name of the struggle against inequality, perverted into the elimination of differences.

This harm consists in the irreversible scrambling of three things: genealogies, by substituting «parenting» for fatherhood and motherhood; the status of the child, who would go from being a subject to being an object to which others have a right; and sexual identity as a natural given, which would have to give way to orientation as an individual expression, in the name of the struggle against inequality, perverted into the elimination of differences.

It's very difficult to protect ourselves from mentally ill people who are willing to go to extreme lengths to harm others with disregard to their own safety.

It's the people, and even family members or other Christians who seem to hate us, and the people who are out to cause us harm, and the people who spread lies about us that we have trouble loving.

I have always envisioned myself as a non-violent person, as one who does not want to cause harm or suffering to any other living beings.

There are many people who avoid gluten without actually knowing what it is, and for these people, while it certainly does not do any harm, it doesn't necessarily benefit them to go gluten - free, other than that by doing so they are avoiding gluten - containing foods such as cakes, breads and biscuits which are usually high in calories and fat.

Players who were willing to risk physical harm to improve benefited because other players weren't willing to risk physical harm to improve.