It also helps pay for your legal defense costs if you are charged with causing
harm to others with your car.
Not exact matches
We empathize
with Mr. Huang's family, who are understandably facing loss and grief, but the false impression that Autopilot is unsafe will cause
harm to others on the road.
Then,
to top it off, Apple says that WikiLeaks,
with its public threat
to release ways
to attack Apple and
other tech companies» products after 90 days if bugs are not «fixed,» is actively working
to harm iPhone users:
For the vast majority of all
other companies, however, we do not have (and probably do not want the kind of) the brand equity
with our customers
to allow us
to wear pajamas in a professional environment, so it could greatly
harm the value we are trying
to convey.
But according
to happiness expert and author Christine Carter there's a more fundamental problem
with adjusting your behavior
to please
others — not only does it
harm you, but science shows that
other people don't actually like it much either.
On the
other hand, if you have a coworking space in the direct vicinity of WeWork or in a relatively untapped market, their marketing efforts might do you more
harm than good, as we saw last year when WeWork employees started
to reach out
to other workspace members in the hopes of getting them
to sign a lease
with WeWork.
Notwithstanding anything
to the contrary herein, if Thing Daemon believes in its discretion that your sale or any products, services, content or
other materials in the listing or on Thing Daemon's servers may create liability for Thing Daemon or
harm other users of the Services, then you agree that Thing Daemon may take any actions
with respect
to the content or materials or listing that Thing Daemon believes are prudent or necessary
to minimize or eliminate our potential liability or
to protect
other users of our Services.
«The associations urge President Trump
to avoid any decision which would do
harm to so many downstream steel manufacturing companies and
other steel consumers, our employees, and our customers,
with little or no additional protection
to the basic steel industry, while at the same time causing great economic
harm to numerous
other sectors of the US economy.»
Displaying what Donald (now Dierdre) McCloskey once characterized as «the intellectual range from M
to N,» there is no real comparison of the Fed's record
with that of the system that preceded it; no mention of
other monetary systems circa 1913 that had better records than the United States (most pertinently, that of Canada); not nearly enough acknowledgment of the great
harm the Fed has caused more than once in its history; no discussion of why a few
other central banks — though surprisingly, only a few — have performed better than the Fed; and no inkling that central banking may not be the best of all possible systems in the best of all possible worlds.
I see nothing wrong
with a religion as long as it doesn't cause physical
harm (i.e. mutilation, torture, abuse or murder etc.)
to it's members or
others.
I would prefer that people leave it at this, «What two consenting adults do
with one another that doesn't cause physical or financial
harm to others, should be legal and they should be left alone.»
I may not agree
with his religion, just as I don't agree
with most of them, but I will verbally defend until my last breath and keystroke his right
to believe what he wants, short of doing
harm to others.
Stop deluding yourself and live your life
to it's fullest
with least
harm to others and help
others to do likewise.
As I posted previously on here, «What two consenting adults do
with their lives, so long as it doesn't cause physical or financial
harm to others, should be legal and they should be left alone.»
They all have
to do
with judging and
harming others.
He had a right
to own that bible and even carry it, but he abused his right by
harming others with it.
Legal academics have argued that this sort of
harm strikes at the heart of the common good, and that judges should count it against the moral and religious liberty claims of those seeking
to avoid complicity
with others» sins.
To be moral means that you will not bring harm to any other individual with your belief system, that is not true when it comes to some Christians and the gay issu
To be moral means that you will not bring
harm to any other individual with your belief system, that is not true when it comes to some Christians and the gay issu
to any
other individual
with your belief system, that is not true when it comes
to some Christians and the gay issu
to some Christians and the gay issue.
Robert Brown & AverageJoe76 If «sin» can be equated
to causing
harm to others and ourself then we can be said
to have been born
with this ability, but the underlying question, Robert, is whether or not being gay causes
harm.
We're more concerned
with the followers of your imaginary friend and the way they use their belief
to justify
harm to others.
Just as
with science, these tools can be turned
to do each
other harm.
The answer, I believe, is that the inherited Western worldview has done, and is doing, great
harm to human beings and the
other creatures
with which we share the planet.
We are not loving God or people if we refuse
to justly deal
with criminals who will
harm others.
Just because evil is always relative does not mean we as humans can not see ourselves in
others and share that
with them, letting them know we can relate, that we feel the relative evil as well and attempt
to support those in
harms way by saying «I am you too, i'm on your side.»
Christians don't hate you any more than they hate someone who sleeps
with others outside marriage, gets a divorce, drinks
to excess, or smokes and
harms their body.
In the
other a Furry takes your family members likeness and covers them in fluffy love, all night long until they have
to wash out the sticky
with a hose, see no
harm done...
too many people today are allowing themselves
to become bandits dishing out their idea of «justice»
with no care
to whom they are
harming or the effect their actions will have on
other families.
People invent all sorts of reasons
to do
others harm, they have
to because if just left
with basic empathy and compassion no one would think it right
to kill another human if they can put themselves in that
other humans shoes.
I call it sophisticated ignorance... Love yourself enough
to do no
harm to others and kill them
with kindness.
Hence, we will never do things that would
harm others even if we are in the brink
to do so and being motivated by any circu.stances and even if we are in the position and capacity
to do it likewise the cability
to get away
with it.
Because they were concerned
with their own impotence in good works and
with the
harm they were doing
to others, they were not less altruistic than those who were concerned only
with doing good, and inattentive
to the evil consequences of many good works.
The programs taught me about (1) admitting I was beat, (2) coming
to believe in something greater than myself (eventually a higher power)(many evolutions and concepts of HP, all of these at one time or another: nature, the 12 steps, creator, Love, spiritual principles)(Step 3) applying my low self worth and gigantic Ego
to these spiritual principles (4) write down my liabilities and assets (5) share them
with another and my higher power (6 & 7) ask for the liabilites
to be removed and be patient
with the process (8) Make a list of all that were
harmed by me (9) make amends
to such folks except whn
to do so would injure them or myself (10) take a daily inventory of my day, checking for snafus, mean temperment, arrogance etc (11) meditation and prayer
to communicate
to my higher power and quiet reflection
to listen for the Truth (12) after having a spiritual awakening as a result of working these steps, help
others if they wish for help because now I am in the position
to assist.
As long as a person is happy
with their belief; and are not
harming others, then they should have right
to not only follow their belief but also protection from persecution for their belief.
But Americans are curiously unwilling
to learn from Europe, even though almost all member - states of the European Union have better policies and lower rates of addiction than the U.S.. On
other points, Massing is in agreement
with the
harm - reduction approach: he favors free needles, methadone treatment, decriminalization of marijuana and repeal of mandatory sentencing.
The Church colluded
with that rather than seeking
to help those he had
harmed, or assuring itself of the safety of
others.»
«Take heed
to yourselves; if your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him» (Luke 17:3) Those who sin and who
harm others must be confronted
with their deeds so that they might repent.
You use your interpretations of the Bible as weapons
to harm others,
with no rational or logical thought
to the damage you do.
Anyone coming into contact
with Worley, or the
other bigots, should take any action possible
to harm them, like they
harm others.
Truth is people like Obama have done more
harm to Islam than any
other living being
with their methods and ideology.
If I
harm someone but provide closure for myself in order
to get on
with life, that's called sociopathological... a condition where I am unaware of the ramification of my actions upon
others, or if I am aware, I don't care.
If it were an accident, the first time it caused rashes and or nose bleeds and diarrhea, they would have written what caused it in my Medical Records
to stop
others from causing the adverse reactions, but no, they have
to try
to prevent a Law Suit and write that I am delusional about the adverse reactions so every Doctor after that forced the adverse reactions on me and or refused
to give me the Medical Treatment actually need, while they make money off charging the government for the Toxic Harmful Drugs that a Judge ordered them not
to give me, tut they just falsely called me delusional about the Court Orders,
to made money poisoning me
with Toxic Drugs and Rash Creams, but normally they do that
to their suspecting Victims
to make money off doing Kidney transplants like they did
to my Uncle, but they will not replace mine, because that is what they planned
to do
to kill me, just ask their associate assassin Dr Kanter of the Minneapolis VA, of course he will say I am delusional after he assaulted me saying the
other Hospital Labs were wrong about that Blood Test that show the
harm they caused.
«The best Muslim is the one who is good
to his / her family and neighbors, and one who avoids
harming others with his / her hand or tongue.»
«Since the Bible depicts
other peoples» cultures, and we know from African culture that not everything in culture is liberating, we come
to the Bible
with the same cautious approach we have
to culture... Any interpretation of the Bible is unacceptable if it does
harm to women, the vulnerable and the voiceless.»
It's very difficult
to protect ourselves from mentally ill people who are willing
to go
to extreme lengths
to harm others with disregard
to their own safety.
So all human regardless of faith are good
to other fellow human
with exception of few that intends
to harm other human...
Laws that regulate behaviors that don't genuinely cause
harm to others is at the crux of the issue people have
with evangelicals.
Tamper - evidence is key in some sobering instances, like when someone
with a plan
to harm others is looking at your products as their next opportunity.
In addition, he observed that declaration could «
harm the interests of consumers by undermining the incentives of mobile operators
to make investments
to compete
with each
other in regional areas».
Governments, producers and
other stakeholders need
to work together more vigorously
to reduce
harm associated
with unregulated alcohol
I don't know enough about psychology
to understand how a player that may have been rushed at some point in his career is irreparably
harmed if they are given successive opportunities
to prove themselves
with other coaches, teams and leagues.