Sentences with phrase «harm to others with»

It also helps pay for your legal defense costs if you are charged with causing harm to others with your car.

Not exact matches

We empathize with Mr. Huang's family, who are understandably facing loss and grief, but the false impression that Autopilot is unsafe will cause harm to others on the road.
Then, to top it off, Apple says that WikiLeaks, with its public threat to release ways to attack Apple and other tech companies» products after 90 days if bugs are not «fixed,» is actively working to harm iPhone users:
For the vast majority of all other companies, however, we do not have (and probably do not want the kind of) the brand equity with our customers to allow us to wear pajamas in a professional environment, so it could greatly harm the value we are trying to convey.
But according to happiness expert and author Christine Carter there's a more fundamental problem with adjusting your behavior to please others — not only does it harm you, but science shows that other people don't actually like it much either.
On the other hand, if you have a coworking space in the direct vicinity of WeWork or in a relatively untapped market, their marketing efforts might do you more harm than good, as we saw last year when WeWork employees started to reach out to other workspace members in the hopes of getting them to sign a lease with WeWork.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if Thing Daemon believes in its discretion that your sale or any products, services, content or other materials in the listing or on Thing Daemon's servers may create liability for Thing Daemon or harm other users of the Services, then you agree that Thing Daemon may take any actions with respect to the content or materials or listing that Thing Daemon believes are prudent or necessary to minimize or eliminate our potential liability or to protect other users of our Services.
«The associations urge President Trump to avoid any decision which would do harm to so many downstream steel manufacturing companies and other steel consumers, our employees, and our customers, with little or no additional protection to the basic steel industry, while at the same time causing great economic harm to numerous other sectors of the US economy.»
Displaying what Donald (now Dierdre) McCloskey once characterized as «the intellectual range from M to N,» there is no real comparison of the Fed's record with that of the system that preceded it; no mention of other monetary systems circa 1913 that had better records than the United States (most pertinently, that of Canada); not nearly enough acknowledgment of the great harm the Fed has caused more than once in its history; no discussion of why a few other central banks — though surprisingly, only a few — have performed better than the Fed; and no inkling that central banking may not be the best of all possible systems in the best of all possible worlds.
I see nothing wrong with a religion as long as it doesn't cause physical harm (i.e. mutilation, torture, abuse or murder etc.) to it's members or others.
I would prefer that people leave it at this, «What two consenting adults do with one another that doesn't cause physical or financial harm to others, should be legal and they should be left alone.»
I may not agree with his religion, just as I don't agree with most of them, but I will verbally defend until my last breath and keystroke his right to believe what he wants, short of doing harm to others.
Stop deluding yourself and live your life to it's fullest with least harm to others and help others to do likewise.
As I posted previously on here, «What two consenting adults do with their lives, so long as it doesn't cause physical or financial harm to others, should be legal and they should be left alone.»
They all have to do with judging and harming others.
He had a right to own that bible and even carry it, but he abused his right by harming others with it.
Legal academics have argued that this sort of harm strikes at the heart of the common good, and that judges should count it against the moral and religious liberty claims of those seeking to avoid complicity with others» sins.
To be moral means that you will not bring harm to any other individual with your belief system, that is not true when it comes to some Christians and the gay issuTo be moral means that you will not bring harm to any other individual with your belief system, that is not true when it comes to some Christians and the gay issuto any other individual with your belief system, that is not true when it comes to some Christians and the gay issuto some Christians and the gay issue.
Robert Brown & AverageJoe76 If «sin» can be equated to causing harm to others and ourself then we can be said to have been born with this ability, but the underlying question, Robert, is whether or not being gay causes harm.
We're more concerned with the followers of your imaginary friend and the way they use their belief to justify harm to others.
Just as with science, these tools can be turned to do each other harm.
The answer, I believe, is that the inherited Western worldview has done, and is doing, great harm to human beings and the other creatures with which we share the planet.
We are not loving God or people if we refuse to justly deal with criminals who will harm others.
Just because evil is always relative does not mean we as humans can not see ourselves in others and share that with them, letting them know we can relate, that we feel the relative evil as well and attempt to support those in harms way by saying «I am you too, i'm on your side.»
Christians don't hate you any more than they hate someone who sleeps with others outside marriage, gets a divorce, drinks to excess, or smokes and harms their body.
In the other a Furry takes your family members likeness and covers them in fluffy love, all night long until they have to wash out the sticky with a hose, see no harm done...
too many people today are allowing themselves to become bandits dishing out their idea of «justice» with no care to whom they are harming or the effect their actions will have on other families.
People invent all sorts of reasons to do others harm, they have to because if just left with basic empathy and compassion no one would think it right to kill another human if they can put themselves in that other humans shoes.
I call it sophisticated ignorance... Love yourself enough to do no harm to others and kill them with kindness.
Hence, we will never do things that would harm others even if we are in the brink to do so and being motivated by any circu.stances and even if we are in the position and capacity to do it likewise the cability to get away with it.
Because they were concerned with their own impotence in good works and with the harm they were doing to others, they were not less altruistic than those who were concerned only with doing good, and inattentive to the evil consequences of many good works.
The programs taught me about (1) admitting I was beat, (2) coming to believe in something greater than myself (eventually a higher power)(many evolutions and concepts of HP, all of these at one time or another: nature, the 12 steps, creator, Love, spiritual principles)(Step 3) applying my low self worth and gigantic Ego to these spiritual principles (4) write down my liabilities and assets (5) share them with another and my higher power (6 & 7) ask for the liabilites to be removed and be patient with the process (8) Make a list of all that were harmed by me (9) make amends to such folks except whn to do so would injure them or myself (10) take a daily inventory of my day, checking for snafus, mean temperment, arrogance etc (11) meditation and prayer to communicate to my higher power and quiet reflection to listen for the Truth (12) after having a spiritual awakening as a result of working these steps, help others if they wish for help because now I am in the position to assist.
As long as a person is happy with their belief; and are not harming others, then they should have right to not only follow their belief but also protection from persecution for their belief.
But Americans are curiously unwilling to learn from Europe, even though almost all member - states of the European Union have better policies and lower rates of addiction than the U.S.. On other points, Massing is in agreement with the harm - reduction approach: he favors free needles, methadone treatment, decriminalization of marijuana and repeal of mandatory sentencing.
The Church colluded with that rather than seeking to help those he had harmed, or assuring itself of the safety of others
«Take heed to yourselves; if your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him» (Luke 17:3) Those who sin and who harm others must be confronted with their deeds so that they might repent.
You use your interpretations of the Bible as weapons to harm others, with no rational or logical thought to the damage you do.
Anyone coming into contact with Worley, or the other bigots, should take any action possible to harm them, like they harm others.
Truth is people like Obama have done more harm to Islam than any other living being with their methods and ideology.
If I harm someone but provide closure for myself in order to get on with life, that's called sociopathological... a condition where I am unaware of the ramification of my actions upon others, or if I am aware, I don't care.
If it were an accident, the first time it caused rashes and or nose bleeds and diarrhea, they would have written what caused it in my Medical Records to stop others from causing the adverse reactions, but no, they have to try to prevent a Law Suit and write that I am delusional about the adverse reactions so every Doctor after that forced the adverse reactions on me and or refused to give me the Medical Treatment actually need, while they make money off charging the government for the Toxic Harmful Drugs that a Judge ordered them not to give me, tut they just falsely called me delusional about the Court Orders, to made money poisoning me with Toxic Drugs and Rash Creams, but normally they do that to their suspecting Victims to make money off doing Kidney transplants like they did to my Uncle, but they will not replace mine, because that is what they planned to do to kill me, just ask their associate assassin Dr Kanter of the Minneapolis VA, of course he will say I am delusional after he assaulted me saying the other Hospital Labs were wrong about that Blood Test that show the harm they caused.
«The best Muslim is the one who is good to his / her family and neighbors, and one who avoids harming others with his / her hand or tongue.»
«Since the Bible depicts other peoples» cultures, and we know from African culture that not everything in culture is liberating, we come to the Bible with the same cautious approach we have to culture... Any interpretation of the Bible is unacceptable if it does harm to women, the vulnerable and the voiceless.»
It's very difficult to protect ourselves from mentally ill people who are willing to go to extreme lengths to harm others with disregard to their own safety.
So all human regardless of faith are good to other fellow human with exception of few that intends to harm other human...
Laws that regulate behaviors that don't genuinely cause harm to others is at the crux of the issue people have with evangelicals.
Tamper - evidence is key in some sobering instances, like when someone with a plan to harm others is looking at your products as their next opportunity.
In addition, he observed that declaration could «harm the interests of consumers by undermining the incentives of mobile operators to make investments to compete with each other in regional areas».
Governments, producers and other stakeholders need to work together more vigorously to reduce harm associated with unregulated alcohol
I don't know enough about psychology to understand how a player that may have been rushed at some point in his career is irreparably harmed if they are given successive opportunities to prove themselves with other coaches, teams and leagues.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z