Not exact matches
His
action spared much
of the
harm that some countries still face
as result of the devastating effects
of lead on human health.
Specifically, Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company was engaged in predatory lending practices that saddled subprime borrowers and / or those with poor or limited credit histories with high - interest rate debt that they could not repay; (ii) many
of the Company's customers were using Qudian - provided loans to repay their existing loans, thereby inflating the Company's revenues and active borrower numbers and increasing the likelihood
of defaults; (iii) the Company was providing online loans to college students despite a governmental ban on the practice; (iv) the Company was engaged overly aggressive and improper collection practices; (v) the Company had understated the number
of its non-performing loans in the Registration Statement and Prospectus; (vi) because
of the Company's improper lending, underwriting and collection practices it was subject to a heightened risk
of adverse
actions by Chinese regulators; (vii) the Company's largest sales platform and strategic partner, Alipay, and Ant Financial, could unilaterally cap the APR for loans provided by Qudian; (viii) the Company had failed to implement necessary safeguards to protect customer data; (ix) data for nearly one million Company customers had been leaked for sale to the black market, including names, addresses, phone numbers, loan information, accounts and, in some cases, passwords to CHIS, the state - backed higher - education qualification verification institution in China, subjecting the Company to undisclosed risks
of penalties and financial and reputational
harm; and (x)
as a
result of the foregoing, Qudian's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
I hereby agree to absolve and hold harmless the staff
of Stone Mountain Pet Lodge and any parties connected with the services being provided in any way, singly or collectively, from and against any blame and liability for any injury, misadventure,
harm, loss, inconvenience, or damage suffered or sustained
as a
result of participation in the services or any
actions therewith.
Similarly, a uniform risk mitigation strategy (e.g., import bans and interstate movement) is rarely appropriate considering the complexity
of environments and species across the U.S.. By using the
results of risk assessment
as the starting point rather than the final decision, managers and engaged stakeholders can collaborate to develop a balanced course
of action to reduce the risk
of harm from non-native species.
Those main conclusions are that climate is changing in ways unusual against the backdrop
of natural variability; that human activities are responsible for most
of this unusual change; that significant
harm to human well - being is already occurring
as a
result; and that far larger --- perhaps catastrophic — damages will ensue if serious remedial
action is not started soon.
But in order to win a lawsuit, you have to have damages
as a
result of some
action, AND you must prove that the
action was done with intent to
harm or was otherwise negligent.
If you have been
harmed as a
result of consuming food contaminated with these bacteria, you need to take
action to stand up for your legal rights.
More than ten years ago, in Western Canadian Shopping Centres v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 534, the Supreme Court
of Canada wrote
of the social need for class
action lawsuits to resolve problems that arise when many persons suffer similar
harms as a
result of a single act or decision.
Despite the fact that motorcyclists face greater physical risks than other drivers, bikers have the same entitlements
as other motorists, and this includes the right to pursue legal
action if they are
harmed in an accident that is the direct
result of another person's negligence.
Also, the
harm suffered
as a
result of the expression must be sufficient that there is a greater public interest in the
action continuing.
While we recognize that recovering compensation in a lawsuit can not undo the terrible experience your loved one has gone through, it does allow us to hold the nursing home and staff accountable for the
harm caused
as a
result of their negligent
actions.
(2) If an organization has been convicted
of an offence under this Act and the conviction has become final
as a
result of there being no further right
of appeal, a person affected by the conduct that gave rise to the offence has a cause
of action against the organization convicted
of the offence for damages for actual
harm that the person has suffered
as a
result of the conduct.
Barry Regar is a Palm Springs personal injury lawyer with more than 40 years» experience representing clients who have been
harmed as a
result of another's negligent
actions.
57 (1) If the commissioner has made an order under this Act against an organization and the order has become final
as a
result of there being no further right
of appeal, an individual affected by the order has a cause
of action against the organization for damages for actual
harm that the individual has suffered
as a
result of the breach by the organization
of obligations under this Act.
Such cases involve legal disputes arising when a person suffers bodily
harm or injury (including emotional distress)
as a direct
result of someone else's
actions.
If an actual or perceived breach
of our security measures occurs
as a
result of third - party
action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, our brand and reputation may be
harmed, customers may curtail or stop using our services and we may face claims and potential liabilities, which could adversely affect our business,
results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.